German philosophers Karl Mark and Friedrich Engels worked together throughout much of their lives as social activists, often co-authoring many pieces of literature on a socio-economical ideology. In 1848, they were commissioned by the Communist League to write a pamphlet that would serve as an explanation of their concept of socialism, and how it was an expected result of the class systems that were created by the capitalist system. Within this pamphlet, called The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels explained how history has proven over and over again that class struggles always exist; there is always a group of people who unethically exploit others, own most of the capital, and become dominant, and there is always a group of people who are the ones exploited and oppressed. These class systems, and their accompanied class struggles, eventually change society by affecting both its political and intellectual history. …show more content…
Society would continue to have no classes at all. Every citizen would be expected to come together for the common good of society. If a person needed something, then they would be able to easily attain that good by working in exchange for commodities. Thus, there would no longer be a need for money. There would also be no state, no government, or even laws, as that would once again create classes of those who are governed and those who are governors. Competition and wars between other countries would cease as well because they, too, would reach this same stateless stage. Nations would no longer exist. Most importantly, private property would be abolished and a free market would dominate. The majority of the society would now own and control production, and thus democracy would be used to plan and provide for their needs. Everyone would share ownership of the production, give their labor freely, and share in the wealth that
It’d be a dystopian society where people would not have access to memories, innocent people would get released, and no one would get to make their own
People would not want others to live in a world where they are told to do everything. Like others picking jobs for them and telling them who to live with. Them having no freedom, and having a higher power above
This would be known as The Great Society. The Great Society bettered the lives of the American people. The americans living in poverty dropped from 22.2 percent to 12.6 percent. All people would now be able to afford health care and there was better education. Although the Great Society program somewhat succeeded it still had some criticism along with it such as big sums that were used and stirring up more problems.
Not only that but there is also individualism and competition. But there is also disadvantages such as large gaps between rich and poor people there is also no social safety net for an example welfare. This type of economy can also create greedy, materialistic people where the saying “Dog-eat-dog-society” is based on. Lastly there is no government for the people and that leaves them to make a lot of decisions on their own.
Also, the politicians would have had to been on board with these things instead of everyone trying to make themselves rich. When society works together as a whole, everyone benefits. It is easy to see why people would want to run to the Socialist Party after living and working in the conditions that they did. They would provide citizens with significant social benefits, including guaranteed employment or unemployment insurance and free or heavily subsidized health care, child care, and education. However, it would make people dependent on the state for things that could easily be obtained for themselves and people would be regulated to what kinds of goods and services are produced, how much they cost, the wages or salaries paid to people in different professions, and how much wealth a single individual may accumulate.
This means that there would be a society with no education, property, healthcare, goods, or services. Ultimately, the State of Nature could easily evolve into the State of War over property disputes where people’s rights would be in danger as Locke states, “If man in the state of nature be so free; … absolute lord of his own person and possessions; equal to the greatest and subject to nobody, why will he part with his freedom? Why will he … subject himself to the dominion and control of any other power? To which it is obvious to answer, that though in the state of nature he has such a right, yet the enjoyment of it very uncertain and constantly exposed to the invasion of others … and the enjoyment of the property he has in this state is very unsafe, very insecure. This makes him willing to
In the beginning of the 19th century, the Industrial Revolution caused a massive economic spike from small-scale production to large factories and mass production. Capitalism became the prevalent mode of the economy, which put all means of production in the hands of the bourgeoisie, or the upper class. Karl Marx and Frederick Engels argue that capitalism centralizes all the wealth and power in the bourgeoisie, despite the proletariat, or the working class, being the overwhelming majority of the population. The manufacturers would exploit the common proletariat and force them to would work in abysmal conditions and receive low wages, furthering the working class poverty. “The Communist Manifesto” predicts that as a result of the mistreatment
What would it be like not to have any freedom? To lack emotion? To not be able to think for yourself? No one really knows the answer, and it’s probably best we don’t know, but a few authors have tried to show what they think it would be like. George Orwell and Ayn Rand both experienced the rise of communism during World War I and World War II, and they each wrote their own version of dystopian futures that show what it would be like if something like communism grew to be the only government in the world.
The arguments that Marx and Engels presented in The Communist Manifesto was somewhat effective. The arguments that Marx and Eagle’s presented in The Communist Manifesto was somewhat effective. This text mainly focused on the struggles that the two social classes faced during the Industrial Revolution. The Bourgeois and Proletarians were the two different social classes in the text the Bourgeois was the middle class workers and owners and the Proletarians were labor workers. The Proletarians wanted to overthrow the Bourgeois because they wanted better working conditions, wages, and more freedom.
The three main ideas from the Communist Manifesto The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, had little to no influence when it was first published in 1848 for the Communist League. However, soon after Marx and Engel’s other writings on socialism became published it grew in popularity, and was considered a standard text of the time (Brians, 2006). With Marx’s radical ideas, and Engels’ thorough writing, they were able to convey how they were individual of the other socialists of the time and elaborate on their idea socialism and how it would inevitably be achieved. The three main ideas from The Communist Manifesto are class conflict, ephemeral capitalism, and inevitable revolution.
In November 1847 towards the end of the industrial revolution in Europe, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels were commissioned by the Communist League (previously known as the League of the Just) to write what is now known as The Communist Manifesto. Originally published in London in the German language titled Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei (“Manifesto of the Communist Party”), this political pamphlet has become one of the most influential writings in all of history. Initially, this work had a very small impact on the world as many people were focused on the day to day survival in the brutish environment forced upon them by the industrializing Europe. During the Industrial Revolution, Marx and Engels saw the abuses of the industrial society
Even all religions and morality would be abolished in this new world. There has been no secret society that has caused
In the new society, people will be fully free (Cole). Furthermore, the following are things mention by Marx that need to end before communism can be implemented, Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally
Money would be something that didn 't exist in this utopia, money has taken over the world and has made everything unfair politics and celebrities all have more money than everyone I don 't believe everyone should be so separated no one should have more power than the next
For many years, people have fought to defend capitalism claiming that capitalism brings “freedom”. Capitalism is often regarded as the “fairest” economic system as well. Engels and Marx have been able to dissect into capitalism and have revealed the underlying realities of a capitalist system. Engels and Marks have made notorious that capitalism does not actually represent “fairness” nor “freedom” (or at least not to everyone). Under capitalism, the people who have the most freedom are the people who have the most money, or the people who exploit others.