ipl-logo

The Constitutional Convention: Mason V. Paterson

169 Words1 Page

A meeting was held during 1787 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, known as the “Constitutional Convention”. This was to revise the "Articles of Confederation". This meeting had fifty-five men and each one of them had their own role to play.
Two men that went stood up for themselves, the people, and some states. Both George Mason and William Paterson told the others that they wouldn't sign the Constitution unless what they wanted was there. Mason said, "I would soon chop off my right hand than to sign the Constitution without a Bill of Rights", and Paterson said, "I would rather submit to a Monarch, to a deposit, than to such a fate." (Constitution). This shows that compromising is not always the answer, it could have a negative effect.

Show More
Related

  • The Summer Of 1787 By David O Stewart Sparknotes

    1497 Words  | 6 Pages

    The state representatives often failed to see the big picture, and think with the nation’s best interests first and foremost. Fortunately compromise was found and Roger Sherman brought together the Connecticut Compromise, which focused on settling the large and small state dispute. Only after three fifths and trade compromises could be agreed upon over the major arguments was the constitution made a viable option, and then

    Read More

  • Effects Of Improvements On The Articles Of Confederation

    191 Words  | 1 Pages

    The meeting was to discuss improvements on the Articles of Confederation. It lead to them discarding the first document and creating the U.S. Constitution. Many, including Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Thomas Paine, and John Adams, built the U.S. Constitution. With seven articles in the new document, the following was also put into it. People were

    Read More

  • Fifty-Five Delegates At The Philadelphia Convention Of 1787

    221 Words  | 1 Pages

    In May of 1787, fifty-five delegates from eleven of the thirteen American states came together in Philadelphia. The goal that they had was to fix and improve the current government created by the Articles of Confederation, which had been occurring since the year of 1781. The Articles created a weak alliance among the states. There was nothing that the national government could do about the taxes or regulate commerce. The delegates whom attended the Philadelphia convention had came to agreement that there were issues in the Articles of Confederation that needed to be fixed.

    Read More

  • The Constitutional Convention: The Three-Fifths Compromise

    1152 Words  | 5 Pages

    For this purpose, a special convention was held in Philadelphia for delegates to “overhaul” the Articles of Confederation and “render the constitution of the Federal government adequate to the exigencies of the union” (161). During what came to be known as the Constitutional Convention, many issues were debated and

    Read More

  • George Mason And Patrick Henry's Arguments Against The Constitution

    358 Words  | 2 Pages

    George Mason and Patrick Henry had valid arguments and provided multiple points to support their rejection of the U.S. Constitution. George Mason and Patrick Henry were Anti-Federalist, a political party at the time which argued against the formation of a strong central government. Both Mason and Henry opposed the Constitution because they felt the Constitution would be similar to the British monarchy which had a powerful leader which would enforce unfair laws as well as taxes amongst the state governments and the people in them. George Mason main argument against the Constitution was the creation of a National government which would be strong enough to destroy state governments which represented the people and their interest.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Virginians And The Confederation Government

    728 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many Americans grew upset with the Confederation government. So Alexander Hamilton a lawyer and General’s Aid to George Washington decided to change the Articles of the Confederation. He called on the National Convention to overhaul the document. He requested that Congress call upon all of the states to attend a gathering in Philadelphia. George Washington was the first to arrive in Philadelphia giving the large amounts of creditability for the meeting bringing 55 men from all of the states.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    500 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ever heard of the Articles of Confederation? Thought not. That’s because within only 8 years of their ratification, they were gotten rid of. This was because, among other things, there were no courts, no national currency, and no taxes. So in May of 1787, 55 men gathered together in Philadelphia to come up with a better plan.

    Read More

  • Note On Speeches Debating The Consitution From The NY Ratification Convention

    846 Words  | 4 Pages

    Jason Vo Professor Sanchez HIST&146 11 June 2023 Module 5 Essay: “ Speeches Debating the Consitution from the NY Ratification Convention” The ratification of the United States Constitution in 1787 was an important event that started the conflict between the two factions, the Federalists and the Anti Federalists. This was one of the first significant walls the United States faced after they attained independence from the British government. The politicians of America had broken up into two major factions that were based on the views they had on the ratification of the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    1146 Words  | 5 Pages

    Due to the pathetic turnout of only 6 representatives it became clear that the limitations of the Articles of Confederation were crippling the development of the new country. In 1787 delegates gathered in Philadelphia in hopes to revise the Articles of Confederation. What ended up happening were not minor revisions or tweaks, a completely new charter of the government was drafted, now known as the Constitution. These changes brought fear to some, such as Rawlin Lowndes. He debated the adoption of the federal constitution, suggesting “Would it not be better to add strength to the old Confederation, instead of hastily adopting another” (Doc H).

    Read More

  • Summary Of A Brilliant Solution

    1319 Words  | 6 Pages

    If anyone was to do even a little research about the United States in 1787, one would find that the states were not very unified and life was not easy. Men like, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and George Washington had one thing in mind, to reunite the United States. The book, A Brilliant Solution by Carol Berkin, very clearly depicts the obstacles and adversity that the men attending the constitutional convention had to overcome. Due to a plethora of factors, the men attending the constitutional convention encountered many complications during the convention, ranging from travel issues to a lack of power to even do anything necessary to change the “United” States. The book shows this by describing the story of the men as a “story of anxious

    Read More

  • Confederation Vs The Great Compromise

    483 Words  | 2 Pages

    It was May, 1787, when representatives from all over the country came to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. George Washington was chosen to run these meetings, as they all believed he was trustworthy, he could have an unbiased opinion, and also that he could keep their secret. Their secret being the meetings and the discussions that took place here. They kept it unknown by the media and people so that they could say as they please without unwanted pressure. They created these meetings with the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation, on account of much needed to be done.

    Read More

  • Slavery In Joseph J. Ellis's Founding Brothers

    946 Words  | 4 Pages

    After a fiercely fought revolution, the newly independent American nation struggled to establish a concrete government amidst an influx of opposing ideologies. Loosely tied together by the Articles of Confederation, the thirteen sovereign states were far from united. As growing schisms in American society became apparent, an array of esteemed, prominent American men united in 1787 to form the basis of the United States government: the Constitution. Among the most eminent members of this convention were Alexander Hamilton, Aaron Burr, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson. These men, held to an almost godly stature, defined the future of the nation; but were their intentions as honest as they seemed?

    Read More

  • Who Was The Constitution Dbq Essay

    930 Words  | 4 Pages

    So, in order to fix the articles, 55 delegates from 12 of the states met in 1787 in Philadelphia. However, instead of fixing the Articles, the framers completely rewrote the Articles and made the Constitution

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    522 Words  | 3 Pages

    In May 1787 55 delegates met in Philadelphia to amend the Articles Of Confederation. They debated about the New Jersey plan and Virginia plan. The states also ratified on how they need the bill of rights. Then they argued about slavery. Many things helped shape the Articles Of Confederation such as how they talked about representation, The states ratification, and slavery.

    Read More

  • The Articles Of Confederation Was A Dismal Failure

    1059 Words  | 5 Pages

    This new document, known today as the Constitution of the United States, provided a framework for our government that we still follow to this day (Congress for Kids 5). On May 25, 1787 until September 17, 1787, delegates from twelve of the thirteen states met in the State House in Philadelphia (Blum 120). This gathering, called the

    Read More

More about The Constitutional Convention: Mason V. Paterson

Open Document