In the Masterpiece Society (TNG), an important element of the episode is the controversy surrounding eugenics, and the effect selective breeding has on what it means to be human. The Enterprise stumbles upon an isolated colony that is genetically engineered to be the perfect society—they have eradicated disease, live in harmony with their environment (and each other), and are designed specifically to fulfill a defined purpose in the society. Nearly everything is accounted for and very little occurs that is unexpected. The colony’s society is perfectly balanced, but it is also extremely fragile. One change could destroy the society, could let it fall to chaos. And, for all its perfection, this society is not as technologically advanced as the …show more content…
It is efficient, peaceful, and the people appear to be content and fulfilled (at least until the Enterprise comes). The idea of a garden-esque paradise, present throughout many religious stories, is also alluded to in the episode, with the entire colony designed almost like a large garden, where people and plant live together in harmony. I think an important question the episode brings up is whether or not a utopia being a utopia automatically makes it the best type of society. Utopias will always be imperfect because humans are incapable of being perfect. The colony is so fragile that any outside interference—even for the best purposes—could be the destruction of the society. The colony represents the fragility of perfection and how, due to this fragility, the perfect is, in fact, imperfect. For the colony’s society to function it must have the full support of every single member of the society. A citizen leaving upsets this balance and could lead to disaster. This brings up the question of the needs of the many versus the needs of the few, or, more specifically in this episode, individual human rights. It is a citizen’s right as an individual to self determination and, therefore, to leave if they desire. However, this individual choice to leave could potentially destroy the whole society, destroying the lives of
Doctors in Alabama and Virginia gained success in a much different way than other groups, providing a very real threat to society. The eugenics movement also battled a larger purpose; however, their solution aimed to uplift the elite and “able bodied.” This movement is particularly unique in that while it gained momentum, it aimed to significantly push back minority groups. Its major reason for success was not its ability to pass legislation, although Virginians successfully passed laws concerning eugenics.
Which Colony Would I Choose? It's a question that many people in the early time could have asked themselves. This essay briefly discusses the Captain John Smith and Bradford Colony and is explained and illustrated with the with their remarkable actions and ideas. Each had their own way of viewing life in their perspective and were in many ways different, however they both had very similar ideas. The idea here is to see which side is better than the other or are they both the same.
There are also times where individuals are forced into a community and unable to change it without major consequences.
Ayn Rand does not provide information on how long this society has lasted, so it’s possible that this society has not made an advancement on new technology, only using old technology to support the human needs in
He was also the author of updated eugenic family studies, The Jukes in 1915, and The Nam Family: A Study in Cacogenics (1912). Estabrook’s research emphasized the role of genetic susceptibility over environment in the creation of degenerate populations. His studies framed the degenerate behavior of his subjects as justification for stringent reproductive controls including institutional segregation and sterilization. To understand the sociological dimensions of the study,
Darwinists in turn, believed biology to be destiny and that if one's ancestors were unfit their children would be as well. Much like in evolution, Spencer assumed that the unfit populations would decline overtime due to their failure to compete, however paranoia led some Americans to speed up this process, introducing eugenics. Eugenics were supposed to improve men, ridding the undesirable traits of the unfit and changing genetic structure to create more fit individuals. The Eugenics movement in America took people of color, the mentally ill or disabled, LGBTQ individuals, and other members of society deemed unfit, and conducted experimentation ranging from forced breeding, involuntary sterilization, or institutionalization on them. Although the movement was eventually stomped out, it violated thousands of
Eugenics is not a thought of morale and is not designed to save the entire human race, just the upper socioeconomic class. In North Carolina, feeble minded individuals were used as subjects for all kinds of genocidal experiments. Feeble minded simply means someone who suffers from an illness or mental deficiency and are often easier persuaded because they think they are getting help when they were really being coerced into becoming a test
The Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering also show that genetic engineering can lead to overpopulation and wars. First of all, in Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., everyone is the same and they have strict laws. In Harrison Bergeron, people are made to be the same by putting weights on strong people, making beautiful people wear ugly masks, and hindering smart people’s thoughts. In Jonas’ community, there is Sameness, which is making everything the
In 1917, a law was passed creating the Oregon State Board of Eugenics. Eugenics is the concept of promoting people with sought after physical and mental traits to reproduce in order to enhance society. The board was allowed to sterilize inmates and patients in prisons and mental institutions, and if they could not reproduce, the thought was it would improve society. However, in 1983 the law was abolished. Sterilizing people does not stop the following generation from having physical or mental abnormalities nor does it prevent crime, using genetics to predict the mental state of future generations is not logical, and the sterilizations were unfair and inhumane.
Well you're absolutely right the people who started this society burned all of the technology and started over. This is on of the main problems that troubled Equality. You don't have electricity, or a cell phone, or even a microwave or refrigerator. What does this say about modern technology?
To create a utopian society, the people of Merry Mount needed to see the need for conformity and to create a baseline for the society to function. To start, they did not see the issues complete freedom caused in their society, but then they were able to see its affects; “Just then, as if a spell were loosened, down came a little shower of rose leaves from the maypole” (Hawthorne 10). The people of Merry Mount realize that complete freedom does not work in a community; individualism needs to be balanced with a certain amount of conformity and a sense of nationalism. In addition, the balance between the conformity and individualism arose due to the conformity of some in society that led others to conform; “Edith and Edgar consistently display an anti-festive, moralistic attitude” (Miller 117). Some of the residents of Merry Mount conformed to the Puritans way of life and this enabled the balance between conformity and individual to arise.
Editing of the human genome in the past has been only a sight seen in dystopia works such as Brave New World. Now, genetic enhancement is a prevalent today and people are beginning to realize the issues that can arise from creating these designer babies. Gene editing can be helpful to eradicate life changing disabilities. Yet, the term disability does not correctly label these differently abled people, as the idea of what is considered disabled has changed overtime. To fully understand the consequences and implications of genetic selection and enhancement of human embryos, society must mature and declare lines of what is and is not ethically moral.
Though eugenics may begin with good intentions, through events such as The Holocaust, one can see how quickly the good intentions can be twisted and turned into something vile and inhumane. It really boils down to the fact that yes, the human race is imperfect. But in that imperfection beauty is found in the diversity as well as progress. If humans were all perfect specimens, there would be no reason to dream or hope for a better tomorrow. The dreamers are the ones who advance society and always have been.
Eugenics The term eugenics was coined in 1883 by Francis Galton. He defined it as the study of “the conditions under which men of a high type are produced” and also as “the science which deals with all influences that improve the inborn qualities of a race”. However, it is not just a field of study and, could be taken as a social movement or policy as well. “Eugenics” may refer to the theory that infers hereditable intelligence and fortune which are possessed by the wealthy, successful and intelligent were made as a result of their good selective breeding, and that the lower classes would remain so because they continued to breed with other poor people from lower social classes or casts. Eugenics could be popular amongst people with a vested