Human subjectivity upholds an objectifying relation to the world mediated through representation. As Dudley’s notion, the relationship between the world and body is sketched out through communication. Every mode of communication is created its own world. So representation is not re-presentation, which is always presentation. There is a matter of fact presentative in presentation. In the 1890s Husserl used the term Reprasentation (with this spell) to let out the concept varied ways of being attentive. Husserlian Reprasentation is no longer representation which uphold special mental act to stress anti-representational intentionality consciousness. Husserlian Phenomenology explains representation related to the experience of an art object which …show more content…
‘Husserl speaks of the process of apprehension in which an individual utilizes what is lived through an object’.
In Husserlian language, consciousness admits intentionality. By the intentionality of consciousness, Husserl means to mark the fact that consciousness is always consciousness of something (15). The perceptual situation is conceived as the perceiver grasps the objects in their experience, an object that transcends in their cognitive acts. The experience of film implies such transcendence where the mind cognitively grasps objects. furthermore, in transcendence, the object reached out to their apprehension. (39)
Husserlian modeling of representation may be seen to occupy a middle ground position between the transactionalism. The Transparency theory is most notably proponent by Andre Basin. In Bazin’s view spectators in apprehending cinematic representation confront objects that stand in a transparent relationship with reality; when we apprehend what a motion picture depicts, we see through the film object to the real object
…show more content…
The basic concept is that the film image bears a transparent relationship to reality. The image of a window is evoked to explain the transparency involved. As spectators, in connecting to the real via photography, we are positioned prior to a window through which we are looked at the things themselves. According to Bazin, film image is to be ‘evaluated not according to what it adds to reality but what it reveals of it.’(63)
Phenomenology of filmic representation will be developed in relation to image, sound, narrative, documentary, content and reception. The act of experiencing a film is to be constitutive of the very object of perception. “Instead of seeing the activity of an image’s meaning we see through our perceptual habit and the image’s construction to an already meaningful world” (Bills Nichols)
According to Husserl there are three moments in every act of perception, which attain all together – noematic, noetic and hyletic (sense). These moments arise together when we perceive the object of our experience. ( Casebier
“The screen is a magic medium. It has such power that it can convey emotions and moods that no other art form can hope to tackle.” The written word and the moving image have always had their entwining roots deeply entrenched in similar narrative codes, both functioning at the level of implication, connotation and referentiality. But ever since the advent of cinema, they have been pitted against each other over formal and cultural peculiarities – hence engaging in a relationship deemed “overtly compatible, secretly hostile” (Bluestone 2).
Rear Window by Alfred Hitchcock is a fillm full of symbolism and motifs that provides viewers with a bigger meaning. It shows these rhetorical appeals through Hitchcok’s eyes that would not be recognized if not analyzed. Through these appeals I have recognized the window as being a symbol and marriage and binoculars as motifs. After understanding much more than what the eye anitially sees when viewing this film there is a fine line between understanding what is going on in the film and observing what the protagonist Jeff is viewing.
So knowing that what is being said here is the color shown and the light shining out the window of that view is meant to show the more obvious and free and extravagant and unique world out there to experience for oneself. Instead of however the plain black and white image of the same view on the Television screen, shining no light, no
In this essay, I will discuss how the film is about film itself. The notions of gaze will also be analysed, through a discussion of voyeurism and Jeff and Lisa’s relationship. This brilliant film about watching the neighbours simultaneously represents a self-reflexive film about the cinema and filmmaking. “[…] Jeff embodies the activity and passivity of both the film maker and the spectator; the director creates and waits, while the viewer
We will first outline what Merleau-Ponty understood and then move to evaluate his theories effectiveness as a critique. In opposition to Sartre, Merleau-Ponty argues that our relationship to the world is not simply a closed perspective and instead the individual and the Other exist in a shared world. The way we experience events is always in time, and can be understood by explanation of Traditional Synthesis. This is the idea that the present is always open to the past and the future, but also most importantly open to the perspectives of Others, because one’s world is not closed to the observation of Others. It is the openness of one 's world which necessitates one 's awareness of the Other, under the idea that we must inhabit the same would to affect each other.
The film reflects on the fact that the audience assumes the role of voyeurs to the screen exhibition because it plays on emotion through the character of Hugo and his
In “Aesthetic of Astonishment” essay, Gunning argues how people first saw cinema, and how they are amazed with the moving picture for the first time, and were not only amazed by the technological aspect, but also the experience of how the introduction of movies have changed the way people perceive the reality in a completely different way. Gunning states that “The astonishment derives from a magical metamorphosis rather than a seamless reproduction of reality”(118). He uses the myth of how the sacred audience run out the theater in terror when they first saw the Lumiere Brother Arrival of the train. However, Gunning does not really care how hysterical their reaction is, even saying that he have doubts on what actually happened that day, as for him it the significance lied on the incidence--that is, the triggering of the audience’s reaction and its subsequence results, and not the actual reactions and their extent. It is this incident, due to the confusion of the audience’s cognition caused by new technology, that serves as a significant milestone in film history which triggered in the industry and the fascination with film, which to this day allows cinema to manipulate and
Over the past century, film has served as a powerful means of communication to a global audience and has become a vital part of the contemporary culture in a world that is increasingly saturated by visual content. Due to the immediacy and the all-encompassing nature of film, the process of watching a film, is widely perceived to be a passive activity by the general masses. However, quoting Smith in his article about the study of film, “nothing could be further from the truth.” The study and understanding of film as an art form enhances the way we watch and appreciate films. It requires the audience's active participation and interaction with the film in order to fully comprehend the directors' intention behind every creative decision.
She argues that the act of moviegoing satisfies these voyeuristic desires in people. She writes, “The mass of mainstream film portray a hermetically sealed world which unwinds magically, indifferent to the presence of the audience, producing for them a sense of separation and playing on their voyeuristic fantasy,” (pg. 186). In this essay, I will further discuss her viewpoints on cinema and voyeurism, and how it connects to the film Rear Window by Alfred Hitchcock. Rear Window is a film that follows the
Film takes photography to another level. Film, or the cinema “is objectivity in time.” For the first time with film “the image of things is likewise the image of their duration, change mummified as it were”. Bazin argues "only the impassive lens, stripping its object of all those ways of seeing it, those piled- up preconceptions, that spiritual dust and grime with which my eyes have covered it, are able to present it in all its virginal purity to my attention and consequently to my love.
Laura Mulvey’s article Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema was published in 1975, has set out the concept of visual pleasure and explains it under a system looks in cinema. Her theory points out that men looked at women, men are the subjects of women, and to look at the object position; (women) accept their role of being looked at and creating visual pleasures for men as well as in the social reality. Her approaching is to use the same “political weapon” (“psychoanalytic theory”) that “the unconscious of patriarchal society has structured film form” (the way men used to oppress women) (Mulvey 483), with the hope to leave “the past behind without rejecting it” (Mulvey 485). To analyze that the main bias of cinema lies in the obsessive psychological
The film gives an overview of the relationship between the viewer and the person being viewed, the relationship of power and dominance. It is a performance in which the artist has symbolically tried to give his audience the taste of reality, through the dual roles he had
Documentary filmmakers strive to capture the real in their documentary films – a convention used by both fiction and non-fiction films to immerse their audiences into the issue. There are a few common methods used by filmmakers to capture the real, all stemming from Dziga Vertov’s theory of Kino Pravda, which explores the idea of truth in films. Realism is important to filmmaking as it helps question the relation of a film to reality. More often than not, our disbelief are suspended the moment we are exposed to a documentary, and we believe what we see much more easily than when watching, say, a movie or television program. A documentary’s main concern is to present a film taken from reality, and to show that reality to audiences as closely as possible.
Baz Luhrmanns contribution to the art of film, brings about a flamboyant and revitalizing side to the industry. Through the use of cinematic language, his story telling techniques and belief in the theatrical cinema come to life. Baz Luhrmann has a very distinctive directing approach with particular techniques that define his style. He presents his films as if he were telling a story, which he invites you into. His stories are simple and he tends to give away the ending at the beginning of the film, which intrigues you to find out more about what had taken place.
There are many things that make a film interesting. This include historical context (ex. social, government, econ, etc.) and the theory around it. Films represent their times and everything that comes with it. On the other side, is the aesthetic.