The Pros And Cons Of The Freedom Of Speech

940 Words4 Pages

for “chilling public discussion and criticism of the administration of justice”.
Section 3(1)(a) of the Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill states that a person “scandalizes the court by intentionally publishing matter or doing any act that imputes improper motives to or impugns the integrity, propriety or impartiality of any court; an poses a risk that public confidence in the administration of justice would be undermined”. The risk is unequivocally a low threshold for contempt as compared to real risk used by the High Court after rejecting the inherent tendency test.
V. Current state of laws

This paper asserts that Parliament restricts free speech too excessively.

The current state of heavy censorship is mostly warranted by public order. While this may seem justified, it is highly illusory. Limitations on freedom of speech should only be necessary if such speech will definitely cause public disorder. However, the impact of these laws result in a restriction on speech that is “nowhere near creating racial riots, and in fact the speech abridged by this rationale may have helped quell tensions”.

Earlier, it has been established that Article 14(2) enables the court to restrict freedom of speech. In the seminal case of Chee Siok Chin, the High Court stated that restrictions on free speech do not have to be reasonable and that it is not the Court’s job to determine whether such a restriction is in each situation appropriate or not.
A. Seditious tendency

The

Open Document