Some people think it is cruel to judge others life and it is not correct but some people think it is a good reason to kill them. However, killing animals is valid or not valid. It has both advantages and drawbacks which depend on the objective of killing. Humans do not kill animals just for fun or hunting it for collection but they decide to kill animals for many purposes. Although it seems to be heartless, it would be appropriate for do it.
Also, that Sir Gawain had no clue that he was going to live and he approached death with much courage which he can present to the knights for them to learn from. As Simon Armitage mentions, “For man’s crime can be covered but never made clean; once entwined with sin, man is twinned for all time.” With these words, it is easy to interpret Sir Gawain was trying to opine that he will possess his sin with him for all time to make sure he doesn’t repeat his mistakes. This emphasizes the conception that the value of this fault is eminently greater than the value of perfection. If the Lord of the Manor deemed Sir Gawain as perfect because he did not have any fault, Sir Gawain would not have come back to Camelot and received as much respect and people would not have a lesson to take away from this
From a personal opinion, however, “Monster” has a more ambiguous meaning, matching its connotation rather than its dictionary definition. The word monster does not apply to a creature that is physically intimidating, but it describes the parts of an individual 's personality that allows them to perform purposefully harmful acts on innocents and feel justified. People hold many beliefs that allow them to do terrible things. Prejudice and arrogance, for example, can lead an individual to behave cruelly, even if they treat the people they approve of with respect and kindness. Any concept that puts one person above another in every-day, human worth is monstrous because it allows one person to feel justified in harming another, verbally or physically.
Defensiveness is instinctual. In caveman days it was how they survived; the fight or flight reaction. When one felt in danger they would do one or the other to protect themselves. It was a matter of life or death. Animals have this same instinct.
The important thing is human who killed those animals. There are many positive aspects about killing animal but there are also some negative aspects. Thus this essay discusses both side of issue. On the one hand, some people are favorable for killing animals. It has many opinions why they have accepted.
Utilitarianism often assesses the consequences of the action to be undertaken and weighs the pros and cons of the outcome. If it is going to yield the greatest outcome and be of benefit to society, then, why not undertake the action? For example, shooting a pack of dogs that have been eating humans and animals (sheep, goats, chickens). This will result in a greater benefit to society; since, Human resources will be saved as well as animals reared for domestic and commercial purposes being preserved. This principle thought me a great deal.
Perhaps when you see that person, you are tempted to think, at least I’m not like them. At least I’m not trying to get all that attention and be so prideful. Except, while thinking that way about a person, you are actually being prideful. You think you are better than they are. Consider for a moment who you think you’re better than.
Stereotypes affect inferences the absence of individuating information. Some samples of stereotypes are, “Loners, Jocks, Emos, Nerds and Geeks.” Those all examples of categorization and gives the idea of which of those groups are better than the other. Misconceptions has no basis, it’s an assumption a person or group creates because they are part of a group. Many confuse misconceptions as prejudice and discriminate, but they’re not. Prejudice requires attitude, a misconception is just a hearsay.
Overprecision is the act of thinking your judgments and decisions are accurate without verification that our decisions are correct. This causes one to be overconfident. Most of us are overconfident than we should about our accuracy of knowledge and our beliefs. One’s confidence interval can be expressed by the bull’s-eye that people draw on a target. The smaller the bullseye is drawn, the more confident they are about their desired outcome.
This shows us that a messy boy is a more obvious stereotype than the female teacher. The last thing we are going to mention is why we don’t have any objectifyings. We think that it is not suitable to have objectifying connected to the commercial because it’s often very offensive against one of the