ipl-logo

The Supreme Court's Secret Power Summary

738 Words3 Pages

The United States Supreme Court is not transparent to the citizens in this country and they fail to publicly reveal reasoning’s to their decisions that they have made. The courts non-transparency make people wonder and uncomfortable for congress has to openly show how they voted one bills Jeffrey L. Fisher razes this type of questions in his article “The Supreme Court’s Secret Power” in The New York Times he raises concern for the Supreme Court and the justice; claiming that they have become too powerful and the people of this country deserve to see how each justice vote due we entrusted them I the position and we deserve to know if they are in good favor. The Supreme Court has to vote on their cases but there is no way for the public to know why they take the case there is a veil over the court. It has been suggested to the court to post a tally of what cases the court is selects the cases that the have chosen as well as the people should know what type of cases the justices have selected for reave. It has come to some individual attention that the people of the United State do not know what the courts have dissuaded on the cases the select, some justices may only vote to take cases that correlate with their agenda; cases that involve corporate Americas issues. This could lead to the people of this county, as well as others in …show more content…

Who voted on what is a question that is believed by some should be asked more often than not and the easiest way to resolve that issue is to post the court rulings. “Least four justices have required the court to do this fall in a case involving the University of Texas? Or would the court’s time have been better spent interjecting itself into the debate in Silicon Valley (and elsewhere) concerning the extent of copyright protection for computer software, as the court declined to do on the same day it granted review in the case from

Show More
Related

  • Comparison Between Earl Warren And William Winquist

    1604 Words  | 7 Pages

    More specifically whether the exclusion of black jurors violated to the defendant’s right to an impartial jury. The question was if retroactive Supreme Court decisions be implicated to selective cases. After reviewing the case, the Supreme Court held that once a new rule has been ruled upon in a case, “the integrity of judicial review requires that we apply that rule to all similar cases pending on direct review.” (Griffith v. Kentucky, n.d.). The Court ruled that applying rules to cases selectively, and not by similarity is

    Read More

  • Public Opinion In Supreme Court Confirmations By Jonathan Kastellec

    637 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kastellec mainly focuses on three elements that are necessary in order to create this connection between the American public and The Supreme Court. The elements are listed as : knowledge, salience and attention. According to his finding, (1) citizens tend to know about court decisions that affect them or the issues they care about, (2) Americans know more about the court and pay ore attention to senators and how they vote according to their views, and (3) the senators do monitor and care about what public think because of their desire for reelection. Therefore, history proves that in order for senators to establish credibility in the

    Read More

  • The Justice System: The Lizzy Borden Case

    191 Words  | 1 Pages

    Throughout the history of the United States there have been numerous court cases that have drawn an incredible amount of public attention. Whether this was because the person involved was a known figure, or the offense that's being charged upon the defendant and/or the conviction that the case resulted in. It seems as if the United States just has an abundant of cases to choose from when choosing to analyze a case and that can possibly be based on the justice system used in the states to proceed a crime in court. One of those controversial cases in the history of the United States was the Lizzy Borden case. This case showed how to escape from the hands of the justice system.

    Read More

  • Executive Privilege: The Supreme Court Case

    199 Words  | 1 Pages

    Before the Supreme Court, Nixon’s attorneys debated that the doctrine of separation of powers prohibited the Supreme Court from investigation this case. The Court vetoed their claim, replying that the circumstance presented a constitutional question, and consequently fell within the responsibility of the judicial branch as interpreter of the Constitution. President Nixon’s attorneys also proclaimed that the president was permitted to unconditional executive privilege. This meant that he could not be required to disclose anything unless he desired to. The Court acknowledged that the president was allowed a degree of executive privilege.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography Examples

    182 Words  | 1 Pages

    22 Sept. 2015 In this journal article, Bowers summarizes the 2012 Supreme Court case of Brown v. Plata and the rulings regarding the issue. The various background information, such as the the split opinions of the Supreme Court Justices, especially that of Justice Scalia (564). Bowers points out that the case came about when a California inmate sued because he did not receive the health care he needed. One of the major claims regarding the issue is that overcrowding was the root of the problem (556).

    Read More

  • Jury System Dbq

    842 Words  | 4 Pages

    Another reason citizens question juries is that they have bias from personal experience or the media. The defendant and the prosecution criticize the jury system because the actual jurors may not understand the situation from any point of view because they come from different lifestyles (Doc E). The American jury system is not a good idea anymore because juries are not experts in law, they have bias, and are not “a jury of peers”. Because jurors are not experts in law, they are subject to be

    Read More

  • The Brutal Killing Of Three West Memphis Boys

    1025 Words  | 5 Pages

    The united states is one of the most empowered country’s from our economy, to our military, but like every other country we have our flaws. Our flaws are found in our judicial system. You can witness these flaws by watching the HBO series paradise lost, a documentary about the West Memphis three, a brutal killing of three West Memphis boys. This court case shows many flaws from the bias to the actual evidence the prosecution shows.

    Read More

  • Racial Bias Among Jurrors

    530 Words  | 3 Pages

    That being said, there is a very lengthy process to getting a person’s case tried before the Supreme Court. To better elaborate, the first step in bringing a case before the Supreme Court is to first have someone’s case be presented through the State or Federal court system decision (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 61). The next step is to have the case tried in a Federal Court or the States Supreme Court, after that there is a decision-making period known as the Discretionary decision, or the Mandatory decision (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 61). The final two steps are the prescreening and the decision-making conferences by the Justices (Harr, Hess, Orthmann, & Kingsbury, 2015, p. 61). Once a legal team or case has gone though all five necessary stages, there will be a formal full judicial decision made by the

    Read More

  • Essay On Mcdonald's Second Amendment

    468 Words  | 2 Pages

    Article III of the United States Constitution delineates the role of our Judicial Branch of Government to afford justice to all people. Indeed, ”To the letter of the law” leaves many in the legal system scratching their heads over their obligations to translate, as well as, deliver justice. Unfortunately, as society evolves, the parameters of any written laws may be construed differently and our judicial system is put to task in arbitrating the rights and restrictions of citizens. One such case, McDonald v. Chicago, captivated the nation in 2010 regarding the 2nd Amendment to the constitution. Clearly stated, the 2nd Amendment reads, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”.

    Read More

  • Marbury Vs. Madison: The Supreme Court Case Brief

    1200 Words  | 5 Pages

    The issue in Marbury VS Madison originated when John Adams named forty-two justices before he left office. This was done to keep a check on the anti-federalist once Thomas Jefferson was elected. The ant-federalist were outrage, resulting in Thomas Jefferson deciding to not honor the commissions. The reasoning Jefferson gave was that “they had not been delivered by the end of Adam’s term.” This was a result of John Marshall failure to deliver them before Adams had left the presidency.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court's Abuse Of Power

    325 Words  | 2 Pages

    The author feels the Supreme court is a bad idea because they think it will lead to abuse of power and the Supreme Court will take over the government because there wasn’t a system of checks to limit its power yet. The author shows this view when they say “In the exercise of this power they will not be subordinate to, but above the legislature . . . The supreme court then has a right, independent of the legislature, to give a construction to the constitution and every part of it, and there is no power provided in this system to correct their construction or do it away.” (Antifederalist 79) This shows he thinks the Supreme Court will have the power to bend the constitution to its whim.

    Read More

  • Campaign Finance Reform Case Study

    1306 Words  | 6 Pages

    Due to the increased prevalence of claims that corporations in the United States are buying and selling politicians through campaign donations, the Supreme Court has been forced to address campaign finance and campaign finance reform in the last several decades. Most people are aware of the highly controversial Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling of 2010. However, the Supreme Court has handed down other important decisions that impact campaign finance, whether at the state or federal level, including Buckley v. Valeo (1976), McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003), and several others. In most of these cases, the Supreme Court ascertained whether campaign spending and donations violated the Federal Election Campaign

    Read More

  • Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'

    710 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Broken Bench

    247 Words  | 1 Pages

    The article Broken Bench explains the controversy over having “tiny courts” in New York State. The author, William Glaberson argues that the idea of justice within the jurisdiction of these tiny courts is unfairly decided among the justices in charge. Due to the lack of experience of these justices, it is difficult for fair justice to be dealt out. One of the major causes explained by the author for unfair justice is that the justices of the court are very inexperienced. For example, William Glaberson states, “Nearly three-quarters of the judges are not lawyers, and many — truck drivers, sewer workers or laborers — have scant grasp of the most basic legal principles.

    Read More

  • Essay On Judicial Selection

    801 Words  | 4 Pages

    Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

    Read More

More about The Supreme Court's Secret Power Summary

Open Document