Tongues Untied (Riggs, 1989) is an award winning documentary by Marlon Riggs with the assistance of many other homosexual black men. The documentary put poems together to recreate an image of what it was like to grow up as a homosexual black man during the 80's. Men in the film spoke about the discrimination they had to face on everyday bases. They were called names like faggot, homo, and punk, but if they kept silent about being homosexual they felt like the silence was just as impairing. Some even reveal that they were treated as a threat or invisible. The film also shows how black homosexuals were able to meet one another in places like gay bars or gay pride meetings and rallies. Each city had their own particular way of how homosexual men interacted. All of them came together in the end to march in the gay pride parade. They risked their life to AIDS to fight for who they really were. Every sexual encounter with another man gave risk to catching AIDS. The film ended with obituaries of men who had fallen victim to AIDS (Riggs, 1889).
The main issue in the film (Riggs, 1889) was discrimination. Some forms of discrimination depicted in the film were the mistreatment of black
…show more content…
Some people spend their whole life's hiding from the people they love because they are either unsure or scare to not be accepted. Many men in the film fund themselves invisible and alone, because they had to stay silent about their sexual orientation. Even if families do not agree with homosexuality they should strive to make each other feel like they would accept each other either ways. Also, parents and children both should look further into educating themselves and each other on the reasons for different sexual orientations. Being educated that not everything is black and white, or concrete can open up a greater understanding of things likes sexual
Using new and archival film, family photographs and narration, and interviews of those homosexuals who experienced
In this movie, you see the life style on being a slave. Solomon Northup was a free man that was kidnapped and was traded off in the slave trade and endured the life style of a slave. There is a scene in the movie where he is building a house and the white man comes and tells him he is wrong and tells him to rip his clothes off so he can be whipped. Solomon refuse and takes a stand knowing that it is wrong he took a stand for what he though was right. This movie was primarily made to show the harsh conditions that they had to go thought but also an insider some of the slaves that made a stand.
Lucid Noon Sunset Blush (2016) is a film about the community and culture of queers in a small town (Texas). Not only does it show and describe some of the challenges of being gay, but it also goes into detail of the challenges one faces who is also “Black or Brown.” “The knowledge of how to survive within capitalism comes the awakening of ideas of queerness, gender, feminism, and sex work.” Living in an area that is mainly white rich people, those who are the minority need to find ways to survive with such inequality. This film also points out body shaming, and shows the reality of sex.
Take into account that this movie was based in the seventies; around a time when being openly gay was frown upon. So anybody that is viewing this film can infer that being gay wasn’t a smart choice, that it was much better to hide your true feelings and live a false, unhappy heterosexual life. Accepting the ideal life that society has deemed morally correct and denied their selves of a happier life, though the guys would meet up once a year, telling their wives that they went on a yearly fishing trip together. To the LGBT people that may watch this film, they may feel as though they also have to hide their feelings about being homosexual and be tempted to live a normal straight life just because that was what society expects and
Ger Zielinski's’ in his article Rebel with a Cause: An Interview with Rosa von Praunheim (2012) reveals that prauheim created many films that portrayed gay activism to being about political change— specially equals for homosexuals. What I find interesting is that New York during the 1960’s became highly gentrified where most of the “tranny bars and sex bars disappears” where the middle-class replaced them with “ tourists, coffee and fashion shops” In effort to displace gay people from New York. As a result of thus, many activist groups began to create campaigns to mobilize politically (p. 40). Rosa von Praunheim’s It is Not the Homosexual Who is Perverse, but the Situation in Which He Lives (1970) film tells a story of a homosexual male (Daniel)
First of all, the movie depicts the progress of gay community raising money to support the mineworkers while incorporating
Black women are treated less than because of their ascribed traits, their gender and race, and are often dehumanized and belittled throughout the movie. They are treated like slaves and are seen as easily disposable. There are several moments throughout the film that show the racial, gender, and class inequalities. These moments also show exploitation and opportunity hoarding. The Help also explains historical context of the inequality that occurred during that time period.
There is no discussion of same-sex activity as it is considered to be taboo. The film expresses the same level of denial and secrecy regarding this issue, therefore the account’s accuracy is depleted to a certain extent (Worden, 2006:
I chose to watch “Easy A”, because I am actually a huge fan of Emma Stone and I have seen bits and pieces of this movie when it first came out but never the whole thing so I thought this would be a perfect excuse to finish watching it and not be judged for watching a “chick flick”. This movie is about a quirky, nerdy and rather unnoticed school student named Olive, played by Emma Stone, who was telling her best friend about a weekend she had, which was rather boring, but she made up a little white lie about losing her virginity. Her friend jumped to conclusions and things quickly spiraled out of control.
Gus Van Sant, the director of the movie, chose to include every detail that he possibly could to relate this movie to American Democracy. He strategically included heterosexual and homosexual actors to spark a political debate. The director clearly wanted to make a point about the discrmination against the LGBTQ society. He emphasizes this by having homosexuals march down the streets of San Francisco, destroying city property.
I have been aware of the arguments presented in the film for a long time, and the opposition we face as Christians with regard to our Biblical stance around homosexual relationships and marriage. This film reminded me that we are facing and will be facing persecution for our beliefs at an increasing rate. It also reminded me that while we should remain vigilant in trying to uphold our convictions, we are to demonstrate the Holy Spirit indwelling us. More than anything homosexuals should know we love them, our position with regard to their lifestyle- comes secondary.
The emerging epidemic of HIV/AIDS during the 1980’s emphasizes on the topic of social stigma throughout the film. The lack of understanding many individuals had towards the disease created a division in society. People such as homosexuals, the hemophilia community, and Haitian immigrants were faced with discrimination due to the ever-growing fear of contagion. HIV/AIDS cases were increasing in many parts of the world leading many people to create their own assumptions on how one can contract the disease. Since it is known that HIV/AIDS is transmitted sexually, some cultures considered it as taboo.
The movie did an excellent job on displaying how society responds to an emerging threat, in this case being the outbreak of an unknown virus, now known as HIV. The movie shows how when the break out of HIV first arose, the media and the CDC portrayed AIDS as solely being a virus that was transmitted among the homosexual community via sexual intercourse, so the straight community had no interest in the problem. As a result, heterosexual individuals were failing to see the emerging health threat from a sociological standpoint on how it reflected the society at large. Rather, heterosexuals viewed the outbreak of HIV as a personal problem that only affected the sexually active homosexual community. Consequently, the straight community began to discriminate homosexuals in a variety of ways,
Its ultimate thesis, that gay people should be treated the same as straight people, isn't wrong, and hearing it from a mainstream-ish movie is just going to affirm that in those who need to hear it most. In that respect, it's important. The movie is about Simon ( (-- removed HTML --) Nick Robinson (-- removed HTML --) ), who begins the movie with narration about how he's just
Name Rakhshinda Shakir 140081 Assignment # 1 Bend it like Becham I am analyzing part five of the movie “ Bend it like Becham”. Pinky’s in laws sees Jess with Jule’s on the bus station showing affability to each other. They misjudge Jess displaying affection to the white boy publically. In addition, the family comes and talks to Jess family and her sister’s wedding is called off .