Was Charlemagne A Good Leader

Others might say he acted like a king because he gave jobs to friends like Swartwout who stole millions from the government. Document 5 states that know

Throughout history, there has been great military leaders come and go. Although, one of the most well-known conquerors is Alexander the Great. Many people thought he was a good leader and a good king. However, the people he conquered think otherwise. The people who supported him say he was compassionate towards others. The people who were conquered believe that he was brutal and relentless. Based on the information, Alexander was a great military leader and a great king.

very confident leader and was not easily intimidated. His opponents were actually the ones that

Charlemange was a medieval emperor who ruled most of Western Europe for forty-six years. He lived from 742-814. He was called "Charles the great" or "Charles". Charlemange became king of Franks. He was emperor of romans, conquered a lot of land, he kept Christianity alive, built schools and he was the father of Europe. Because of these three reasons he was a good leader. (history.com)

Charlemagne was a christian emperor during the middle ages who ruled a large sum of western Europe from the late 700’s to the early 800’s. As a strong and energetic emperor, Charlemagne had many accomplishments during his reign which range from many of his political achievements to creating a school inside his palace where he heavily promoted and supported education. Charlemagne’s political background was extensive since he was the king of the Franks and spent a lot of his time in warfare. Charlemagne also converted many to Christianity. Some may claim that Charlemagne was the reason for the survival of Christianity in western Europe. Charlemagne was a christian ruler who successfully made an attempt spread christianity throughout the area today known as France, Belgium, western Germany, and the Netherlands.

Justinian I was the greatest Byzantine ruler. His achievements in conquest, law, arts and architecture, and the support of his wife are remarkable by the standards of any leader in history. The good things Justinian did outweigh the bad, making him a sovereign ruler. He was ambitious, and believed that he could restore the empire to its former glory. Justinian conquered many lands and territories, preserved Roman Law, and improved architecture and art with the help of his wife, Theodora. All of his accomplishments make him one of the greatest rulers in late Roman and Byzantine history.

Throughout his life, Alexander conquered neighboring countries and showed his military and leadership skills in combat. His empire became the largest of its time period. Unfortunately, he died of illness at the young age of thirty-three, and he had no heir to his throne. However, his ambitious campaigns and conquests, his brave character, and his leadership and combat expertise helped him create a large impact on the world both back then and today.

Charlemagne, King of the Franks, King of the Lombards, and Emperor of Rome, did not achieve these positions just with luck. He worked hard to dominate his kingdom and gain respect from the people. How did Charlemagne become such a powerful figure during the 7th and 8th century? Many contributing factors played a role to his success including the work that his father and grandfather did in order to unite the kingdom and pass it down to Charlemagne, working with the Catholic Church, and conquering land through quite a few wars and campaigns. There are also certain characteristics Charlemagne had that people remember him by. The author, Einhard, talks about how Charlemagne was a legitimate ruler. By this, he means that Charlemagne stands out from

Throughout a lifetime there are maybe a few people that are said to be “great leaders.” As years go by the appreciation for these leaders seems to grow. There are a bunch of these leaders that are still honored today, more specifically, Suleiman the Magnificent and Queen Elizabeth I. Some characteristics that these great leaders exhibited were intelligence, courage, and astute ability.

The brilliant U.S. Army General Douglas MacArthur once said, “A true leader has the confidence to stand alone, the courage to make tough decisions, and the compassion to listen to the needs of others.” This description of a leader can be used when telling of the great adventures of Odysseus on his way home to Ithaca after fighting in the Trojan War. In Homer's epic poem The Odyssey, Odysseus exhibits many qualities that confirm his ability to fit the role of a good leader. He encountered and overcame many obstacles that include fighting cyclops, monsters, giants and more. He did all of this with only the goal of returning to his beloved family in mind. Even though others may claim that Odysseus is not a good leader because of the amount of hubris he shows, the positive qualities such as his good judgement, bravery, and his ability to inspire others prove otherwise.

Charlemagne’s goal was to become the king of the Franks, but he wanted to become a universal leader as well; an emperor over all the people (310). Charlemagne used the church to help him receive the publicity that he wanted. He was a much different ruler compared to Justinian. Once Charlemagne was crowned an Emperor he could sense his plan coming into reality. Charlemagne also wanted to a loyal group of followers but never could seem to find a faithful administration. Charlamange also had a love for learning and created a great school inside the palace not just for himself but the benefit of his royal workers and his sons later on. Also built during the reign of Charlemagne was a system that separated people based on the land they owned. The lowest members were called serf. These members had given up their land to another owner in return for assistance. The members of the community that had control over the farms were the manors. Typically the serfs gave up their land to work for a landowner so that they could have a place to live. If a lord had a church on their property, they had the choice of what to do with it. Many of them used their serfs as “serf priests” so that they could still work and give a sermon once a week. Religion to Charlemagne was important to him. According to the text book, The Heritage of World Civilizations, “Charlemagne shared many of the religious beliefs of his ordinary subjects” (Craig et al the 314). Charlemagne knew he was the king but also knew that he did share similar opinions with his people and that the people were essential to his

Besides being a good leader he was also a military genius. Using the formation he learned from his father he was able to beat all his enemies whether it was Persian Empire or Anatolia they were no match for his army. The formation was 5known as phalanx attack, also being able to fight on all terrain. Using this formation 16x16 each man carried an 18-foot pike and used the cavalry charge solders on horseback. With these

He is mainly looking towards at the other kingdoms and trying to understand what is making them thrive. He knew that other kingdoms were paying a lot of attention towards education and political system. He also notices that each kingdom had a specific location where they would store valuable texts. Charlemagne would spend in his free time reading different subjects and expanding knowledge. He made his children get a proper education because he “was so concerned for the education of his sons and daughters” (Einhard 33). Charlemagne understood that education can help to make new developments and create a better system in the kingdom by having more educated people. He viewed that “educational reform as a central aspect of his vision for Christendom” (171 Backman). He wanted religious officials in the church’s to educated because they can follow the same principals and teach it to the people properly. Charlemagne was not only focused on his own kingdom, but rest of the world as well. He would have communication and try to build relationships with those kingdoms. Charlemagne “loved foreigners and took great care in receiving them” (Einhard 34) He would trade with them and try to understand their systems. When Charlemagne saw something valuable from the other kingdoms then that he could incorporate the ideas into his own systems. In the “seventh century, the Carolingians had secured a … “Mayors of Place “… one of the administrative provinces of the … Kingdom” (146 Backman) He built a capital for the Frankish kingdom despite it not being a very large or lavish building, but it was showing development that the kingdom was making. It made it simple for Charlemagne to have important meetings and a place where can discuss about issues in the kingdom. Despite Charlemagne having various tasks in front of him he always had a strong relationship with the

Historians and Academics of the 21st century each have different opinions on whether Charlemagne was a barbaric slaughterer or a statesman. One modern scholar would defend their opinion in saying that Charlemagne was a brutal murderer who killed thousands of innocent children, families and caused a catastrophe. An opposing side might hold the belief that Charlemagne was a great emperor who unified Western Europe and created innovations that further progressed civilization. Charlemagne, Father of Europe, was a statesman whose intention was to improve the state with his reforms.

Also, he was a person who believed in different religion. His time of emperor was very good and