Historians may argue that Julius Caesar helped rome to make it better and stronger for the people. While this might be true this is misleading because all of Julius Caesar's good actions like giving people more jobs,but it just covered up his worse actions that hurt rome. Also Julius Caesar was named a awful man throughout history from not persevering in hard situations, hurting not helping rome, and doing things for himself. To begin with Julius Caesar was named a awful man from how he didn’t persevere in hard situations. One way he didn't persevere was when Sulla (the emperor of the time) ordered Julius to divorce Cornelia (his first wife) because she was from the family of Sulla's enemies.
In the reading “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman the author gives evidence on both sides of the argument is Caesar a tyrant or a hero? Did Caesar deserve his horrific, and bloody killing in front of so many subjects? Caesar did not deserve this he was a hero to all around him. Caesar was a hero because he made sure to put his people above even himself.
Julius Caesar was a politician, general, and dictator. He once said, “It is easier to find men who will volunteer to die than to find those who are willing to endure pain with patience.” He was an incredible speaker of the time and was very well liked by most citizens. He brought a lot of change to Rome and was a very strong leader. Julius Gaius Caesar was born in Rome Italy, in 100 B.C., on July 13th.
William Shakespeare once wrote a play titled, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,” and the play displayed the events following up to Caesar’s murder and the events that followed. The whole premise of the play was the plot against Caesar, and the effects it had on the people afterwards. Unfortunately, it had a negative effect on the man who murdered Caesar in cold-blood, Brutus. He killed himself, and at the end of the play, the man who once opposed him, Mark Antony, called him, “the noblest Roman of them all.” Was he the savior or traitor of Rome?
Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.
While in captivity Caesar claimed that once he gets out he will crucify all of the pirates. As the pirates laughed on they could never expect that the guy the captured would become arguably the best emperor in history. Once Caesar left the pirates captivity he gathered up some soldiers and hunted down the pirates and crucified them. This just adds on to the greatness of Julius Caesar. Once Julius came back to Rome his name was already recognized by most people and Caesar bought his way in to political power.
Who was Julius Caesar was he a hero or a villain? Julius Caesar was a hero to many plebeians because he made many great accomplishments of the government , Rome, and for the poor. Some people might think he was a villain, but some people think differently. First of all, Julius Caesar did many great effects to Rome. Julius gave land to the landless, like the poor and veterans who didn’t have land before.
In conclusion, Julius Caesar was more of a villain than a hero. He never thought about how his choices would affect his citizens and the people around him and only cared about gaining wealth and power for himself. While others paint him as a hero, Caesar was indeed, a
Caesar had seen him as a hero for the same reason he had seen Octavius as a hero, seeing himself in their
Alexander the great was a hero because although he did kill and enslave people that's really the only truly bad thing he was known for. But he was known for a numerous amount of truly good deeds and only one truly bad things. And in this case the goods out way the bad.
He is label a hero because of his actions and traits combined. Brutus stands up for what he believes in despite the possible consequences as well as killing his best friend for the better of his country. Finally, Brutus is a hero because he holds dear to his heart traits and characteristics that hero possesses. Brutus is a noble man with honest intentions and that is why he is a hero. (5 sentences)
“Caesar’s rule was a blessing” Within the short story “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman, there are many facts to prove that Julius Caesar was a true hero for the people in Rome. Caesar did things for Rome that no one else had ever done. Also Caesar was for the people that no one really cared about. To start Caesar gave the people of Rome opportunities they probably would’ve never had if Caesar had not become the king “Caesar created jobs by building roads, temples, and aqueducts” which allowed for the people of Rome to have more money to buy what they needed, not only did this help the businesses but it helped the city become a better place because the things that were messed up before were fixed.
He was always courageous and persistent in battle, which made many individuals admire him. Similarly, Julius Caesar was a leader of Ancient Rome. In the beginning of Caesar’s reign, he
Caesar could also be seen as villain and had to be killed in order to keep Rome and the republic safe. He was considered a villain because he took down the republic. Even though many people disliked Caesar and his ways, many people were also fond of Caesar such as Brutus who was still apart of the conspiracy. Brutus says “I would not, Cassius, yet I love him well.” (1.2.82)
Everyone knows that Julius Caesar was stabbed to death by his friends, so they naturally assume Caesar is a tragic hero. In digging deeper, the real tragic hero of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is revealed. To begin, William Shakespeare’s play is based on historical events that occurred in Rome around 44 B.C. Julius Caesar was born in 102 B.C. and died in 44 B.C. During this time, he became a power-hungry military leader. His rise to power was a result of such actions that made the Roman public love him.
