Julius Caesar: Hero Or Villain

Mark Antony was a Roman General, cavalry commander, quaestor and senator of the ancient Rome Empire around the final century BCE and ally and second in command to Julius Caesar. Antony was born in Rome in 83 BCE and ended his life by choice with his lover, Cleopatra, in 31 BCE.

Julius was a statesman for Rome and a general and an author. He played an important role in the event that led to the demise of the Roman Republic. and the starting of Roman Empire. Some people consider Julius a dictator. Julius Caesar transformed what became known as the Roman Empire, by expanding its geographic reach and establishing its imperial system. While it's been long disputed , it's estimated that Julius Caesar was born on the 13th of July or the 12th of July. Julius’s dad died when he was only 16 and only had his mom after that. The Rome of Caesar's youth was unstable an element of disorder ruled the republic. Julius had a nephew of another famous Roman general, Marius. After the death of Marius and the rise of Sulla, Julius’s life was in jeopardy. In the early 60’s B.C he launched his own successful political and military career. He campaigned successfully for the consulship and struck a deal with two of Rome’s leading figures. All together they controlled rome until the 50 B.C, until Caesar and Pompey (one of Rome’s figure) after Crassus’s death, went to war against one another in 49 B.C. Caesar devoted his energies to the conquest of Gaul (France). After serving as consul in 59 B.C, Caesar became governor of Cisalpine and transalpine Gaul. In 58, Helvetti in Switzerland attempt to migrate into Gaul and Caesar thought they would be threat. So he stopped them and sent them back to their homeland. Later he had become

Was Caesar really a bad man? He had great qualities to be a leader, but the conspirators had a great reason to kill Caesar. He was also was a very bad man. He would kill all people that would disagree with him, was a terrible leader, and weak. He was a terrible leader because he was not going to go to the traditional race at the festival of Lupercal. The only reason he was not going to go is because a soothsayer told him to beware the ides of March, March fifteenth to be specific.

First of all, Julius Caesar was an unbelievable military leader and emperor. By conquering most, if not all, the Mediterranean Sea basin, he strengthened and expanded the empire. He conquered all that land for farming to feed all the citizens in his empire. He won his soldier’s affection by displaying his incredible leadership and strategies used on and off the battlefield. After conquering a territory, he treated his defeated enemies with a large respect by offering them to join and serve in their government and military. After Julius Caesar’s time as the emperor, Roman was the biggest empire in the Mediterranean Sea basin. Julius Caesar made the Roman Empire the vast republic everyone remembers.

Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone. This paper will show you how Julius Caesar became the man he was and the pros and cons of his leadership.

Historians may argue that Julius Caesar helped rome to make it better and stronger for the people. While this might be true this is misleading because all of Julius Caesar's good actions like giving people more jobs,but it just covered up his worse actions that hurt rome. Also Julius Caesar was named a awful man throughout history from not persevering in hard situations, hurting not helping rome, and doing things for himself.

Secondly, Julius Caesar helps the poor and middle class a lot, which these classes favor him. Julius

Julius Caesar was a very good leader, he did so much for Ancient Rome. He was one of the greatest leaders of all time There were so many things that happened after the death of him that changed Rome, he was part of the first Triumvirate, and changed the Roman Government. These are the reasons why he was the greatest of Rome.

Is it justified to kill someone because they have gained too much power and are going to use it for the worse? Brutus has a very bad circumstance on his hands, he can kill Caesar and possibly be executed for his actions or he can let Caesar become king and watch Rome fall. There are many reasons why Brutus should and should not join the conspiracy. Brutus says, “I know no personal reason to spurn at him But for the general.” (II,i,11). Lucius Junius Brutus one of Brutus’ ancestor that turned Rome into a republic. Brutus loves caesar but doesn't want him to become king.

From the three prescribed readings it can be said that Julius Caesar was a selfish dictator. What was contained in the reading indicated that Julius Caesar is a man that has hunger for power, a self-centered man, and unwavering dictator. And since even the entire people were no longer pleased with present conditions, they rebelled at his tyranny and would like to defend their liberty . It is crystal clear in all the three documents that Julius Caesar was very selfish who only care about himself and his personal goals. In other words in all the three accounts the message is clear that the view of Julius Caesar was not that of a fair and just politician .Assuming he where, the plan to kill him would not have been to assassinate him near Pompey statue, and because he moved the Roman into war across the Rubicon River in North Italy. Caesars action caused his rival Pompey to escape to Greece, and gain absolute control and custody of the whole Italian peninsula. He as well in Spain defeated the legion loyal to Pompey. Caesar was able to capture and killed Pompey in Egypt, afterwards he commanded Cleopatra to act as a surrogate leader to Egypt. He as well conquered all his rivals in North Africa while he left for Rome ensuring his total control and his authority fully in place. Caesar believes this will strengthens the position of power in other to be more effective and therefore made himself a

Caesar could also be seen as villain and had to be killed in order to keep Rome and the republic safe. He was considered a villain because he took down the republic.

Julius Caesar was very popular with the plebeians and lower classes for supporting them. He did this in ways like creating jobs for them. He made many other reforms such as enforcing laws against crime, and including supporters from Italy and other regions in the senate (Cornine et al. 248-249). He made a new Roman calendar, which was helpful to everyday life. He was a fantastic speaker and was one of the best of the time. He didn't hold grudges against most and was said to be tall and muscular (Bruson 88). His army was better than any other army in the world at the time. Although Caesar was well liked by most, he did have enemies. One of them was named Cicero. Cicero came from a wealthy family was a consul in the year 63 B.C. He supported the democracy and did not trust Caesar and his desire for power (Cornine et al. 248-249). Caesar's dictatorship lasted only a year because he was assassinated by members of the senate (Biography.com

In the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, characters such as Brutus and Cassius have many developed character traits. Some of which they share are nobel others are self centered and envious of others. In the following, Brutus and Cassius motives, ambitions, bravery, and heroic actions will be evaluated. What defines a hero or a villain? In regard to respect both were noble and respected in the beginning. The people of Rome under Caesar thought highly especially of Brutus. Brutus is truly heroic based on his personal motives and reasoning, Cassius is self centered and has no ambition for the good of all, for these reasons and more Brutus is a tragic hero and Cassius is a villain.

Also, the main character had to be a high-ranking or dignified person with a tragic flaw that caused their downfall. Finally, the work had to end with the death of the main character. These elements are all clearly seen in Shakespeare’s play, but the elements that create a tragic hero are not as obvious. To be categorized as a tragic hero, the character must have been physically or spiritually wounded resulting in their death, be a king or a leader of men that resulted in their followers falling with them, must learn something from their mistake, be faced with a serious decision, and, oftentimes, have supernatural involvement. Based on these traits, there are multiple tragic heroes in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Although Julius Caesar is often thought of as the only tragic hero in the play, Brutus is the greatest tragic hero because of his physical and spiritual wounds, the decisions he had to make, and being a leader of men that fell with

Caesar was a hero because he made sure to put his people above even himself. He fed the poor and made jobs. He wanted to support the ones who didn’t have much, “The hungry hordes in the city were now given free bread. Caesar created jobs” He was kind to all even those he had bad feelings about. Also in the reading “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” he was even kind to Cassius that seemed quite off to him but ignored it due to the wellbeing of others. Just about everyone could see his greatness and saw him like a god. He even had statues made for him due to his great leadership.