Being a young black male in the south, it is hard not to see the inequality that happens to people that are naïve, stereotyped and criminalized. When ask what is the cause of crime in America my answers given is quite simple. Some would blame the people for this criminal behavior without a second thought will I am here to give that second thought and prove that the people with power have created this criminal out of average people. I have been condition by sever source of information and educated individual to believe that inequality and incorporated racism is the cause of crime in the United States of America, moreover said deviances cannot be remove form human nature. ____
In my opinion race Pratt writing agreed with my view. According to
…show more content…
After taking this class, I have learned that my views on what cause crime in America a hypocritical. Think that crimaloge should be based nature and not nurture. The problem with society is that we have an environment that turn neural people into delinquents and criminals with no hope or want to be rehabilitated. Likewise, my views of what cause crime in America could be called conflict and or radical theory. I think Marxist criminology explains this idea exility when he said “For the bureaucrat, the world is a mere object to be manipulated by him.” I see the radical conflict between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat as a main cause of crime. I think that because the rich and the poop are so disporportet that conflict is just around the corner. Yet, America can’t see that by having a two-party system were one group support the rich businesses and the other support the poor masses, is the cause of riots, vandalism and deviants. …show more content…
Every time I try and wrap my head around it, I get frustrated by the complexity. I wonder why can’t we all just be friends and stop stealing form each other. Do a little more giving and a little less envying. Be for taking this class I defined the cause of crime as inequality and human nature. I believed that crime is created by the environment one person is in and not away the chose they have to make because of bad time and outside factor. Over this study, I have learned that my view on why crime happing in the United States are called deterrence and conflict/ radical. During this study, I have not had a major paradigm shifts in my thinking of what cause crime poetically because I have stayed “woke.” Woke means educated in a subject. This class has made my view of crime clearer and gave me the education to defined what it
Crime itself is an innate part of society, some may view it as a necessary component in one's society. New York city has had a history of high crime rates at one time. In the article, “How New York won the War on Crime” by Steve Chapman, the author discuss how New York City during the 1960s to the 1980s was viewed as “chaotic”, and mentioned that in 1984 there were at least “5 murders a day”. However, New York City now is not the same one it was during that time. The NYPD website provides a graph describing the crime rates and population growth in New York City between 1990s to to 2014.
In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory, advances in criminological theory (Vol. 15, pp. 251–273). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. Kramer, R. C. (1985). Defining the concept of crime: A humanistic perspective. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 12(September), 469–487.
To expand my research to attain the goal of understanding specification of both explanations, The southern subculture of violence theory blames higher crime rates in the South on “cultural values that evolved from that region’s unique history” (Ousey, 2000:268). All cultural explanations are based on the social learning approach, which holds that criminality is learned through intimate interactions with others. Another example is that capital punishment is highest in the South. The economic deprivation explanation to differences of crime rates within regions of the country is synonymous with strain theories.
A person is not born as a criminal, it is watched and picked up on by the individual through social influences. The theory can predict whether an individual will turn to a criminal path rather than one that abides by the laws. If a person watches crime be committed and is around crimes and deviant behvavior during their impressionable years, it is much more likely that they will follow in those footsteps and become a criminal themselves. The motivation for crime could be heightened by being low-class or living in a high-crime community. One of the main critiques is that people can be individually motivated.
The composition of the surrounding dictates the overall crime rate of the area. The theory is merged with a series of disadvantages that has led to the rise of criminal activities. The limitations are as discussed below: First, the theory does not recognize that there are individuals who are self-driven and cannot be compromised by the status of the surrounding community. When a literate person is taken through this theory, it may have some negative influence more so when they come from environments with such unethical behaviors. The aspect can easily interfere with the security concerns of a given area.
The initial thought of why crime was so bad in the past is because of segregation and what role it played. Blacks were being treated less than whites, where white people were making more money than blacks. These conditions sparked violence in the city. Another cause of violence was the work environment and how it was being left unnoticed.
1. Explain why no single factor can be considered the cause of the crime decline in the 1990s. Advocates who are in favor of their individual crime fighting polies argue that it was their approaches such as, increased incarceration, decline use of crack, community policing and many more that truly resulted in the great American crime drop. However, there is no single explaination as to why crime fell in the United States, rather it was the cause of different and new policing strategies working together at the same time. The dramatic decline in the use of crack cocaine and the recent innovations such as, deterrence policing all provides tangible evidence that they are some of many plausible explanations that contributed in the great American
Several peculiar institutions have had the ability to effectively control, confine, and define blacks in America’s history. Systems included chattel slavery, which was the turning point of the plantation economy, the Jim Crow era legally upheld segregation and discrimination, and the mechanism of ghettos which are comprised of minorities, parallel to the collective proletarianization and urbanization of blacks. Lastly but not least, the carceral apparatus has helped to perpetuate a social and economic hierarchy, due to the subjugation of minorities, within the US directly affecting life outcomes of those who are directly and indirectly affected. According to the US Bureau of Justice Statistics, they are about 2.3 million people in jail, which
Our society has changed and with it so has crime. Political Analysis (What are the
13th Documentary Analysis Ava DuVernay’s documentary mentions that the United States makes up five percent of the world’s population yet is home to twenty five percent of the world’s prisoners. One out of four prisoners in the world are locked up in the U.S. The United States now has the highest rate of incarceration in the world. The thirteenth amendment of the constitution makes it unconstitutional for someone to be held as a slave.
There are many theories that suggest that crime is constructed socially, or is a product of the society in which the crime is committed. One such theory, proposed by Robert Merton, is known as strain theory. While strain theory is a useful model for explaining how societal values can drive people to commit crimes, it has several flaws and does not focus on how laws are made and how this contributes to the formation of crime. While Merton suggests that laws are created from consensus within a society, it will be argued that strain theory can also support the idea that laws are a “product of conflict” (Hagan 5). Strain theory is founded on the idea that the goals of a society and the accepted means of achieving said goal causes strain that can
Hofstadter writes, “our violence lacks both an ideological and a geographical center; it lacks cohesion; it has been too various, diffuse, and spontaneous to be forged into a single, sustained, inveterate hatred shared by entire social classes.” Hofstadter is inferring that the very essence of violence has many different roots and is not due to one single class or ideology. Therefore, the root of American violence does not lie in present-day America. Rather, it is from the past. When looking at how the U.S. was erected, one particular aspect that stands out among others is the will to uphold U.S.
The first is that criminal law does not define crime properly because it does not include the most dangerous antisocial behavior that takes place (Reiman, p. 67). The second is that police and prosecutors do not make charge and arrest decisions based on criteria that will help them get the most dangerous criminals (Reiman, p. 67). The third is that criminal convictions are also not necessarily the ones that are most dangerous (Reiman, p. 67). The fourth is that the decisions that sentencing judges make are not made with the intentions of protecting society from the most dangerous criminals, nor do they reflect proper punishment according to the crime and the harm done by it (Reiman, p. 67). The fifth is that the first four hypotheses validate that criminal acts are indirectly identified with the poor (Reiman,
Society within the boundary unites against those outside the boundary, therefore strengthening the solidarity of the society. According to sociologists, crime is a function of inequality. The more inequality seen in a society, the more crime
Crime offers a way in which poor people can obtain material goods they cannot attain through legal means. Often, threat or force helps them acquire even more goods, encouraging them to commit more violent acts such as robbery and rape. Thus, poverty increases crime