ipl-logo

What Crime Is Ms. Mapp Case Related?

506 Words3 Pages

What crime was Ms. Mapp charged with? It was in May 1957, when Cleveland police forced entry into Dollree Mapp's home without a warrant. The Cleveland police was searching her home in look of a fugitive, that happened to be there. They wanted to question the man about a recent bombing and believed that this person was hiding inside Mapp’s house. No suspect was found and after an illegal instruction of her property with what appeared to be a fake warrant presented by the police, Mapp was charged with possession of obscene materials and numbers paraphernalia in her basement under the Ohio Revised Code section then in effect.
To which amendment to the constitution does the case relate?
Mapp appealed her case to the Supreme Court stating that the 4th Amendment should be incorporated. The 4th Amendment prohibits against unreasonable searches and seizures, and during Mapp’s arrest, the police came to the founding of the evidence presented in the trial without a warranty. Fourth Amendment states: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the …show more content…

The police had no warranty, and even though she was probably guilty, she was still a citizen of the United States, and the police should have had a search warrant to inspect her house. Even the police have limits, and in this case, they should have not abuse their power to force themselves into the house. On the other hand, there was evidence found against her, and she was covering a fugitive of the law, but she was still in her property. Even though she might have been a criminal, the police abused its power by even providing a fake warrant that later was not even presented in front of the Supreme Court

Show More
Related

  • Case Study Of Dollree Mapp's Home In Cleveland

    233 Words  | 1 Pages

    Mapp said the suitcase was not hers and she had lent it to a boarder. She was arrested, prosecuted, found guilty, and sentenced

    Read More

  • California Vs. Greenwood Case Study

    478 Words  | 2 Pages

    The case involves the question of whether or not the police were within their rights to search the trash that was left at the curbside without a warrant. The amendment

    Read More

  • Case Brief Of Moore V. City Of East Cleveland, Ohio

    645 Words  | 3 Pages

    • Her motion was however overruled and she was fined $25 and sentenced for five days. • Her constitutional claims were considered and affirmed by the Ohio Court of

    Read More

  • The United States V. Place 462 US Case Brief

    510 Words  | 3 Pages

    Significance: The Supreme Court here expresses that governmental conduct like drug dog sniffing that can reveal whether a substance is contraband, yet no other private fact, does not compromise any privacy interest, and therefore is not a search subject to the Fourth Amendment. Terry v. Ohio permits only brief investigative stops and extremely limited searches based on reasonable suspicion including seizures of property independent of the seizure of the

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case: The Case Of Mapp Vs. Ohio

    354 Words  | 2 Pages

    The case of Mapp vs. Ohio is a case of illegal search and seizure. It went to the Supreme Court in 1961. It is important to today’s society because it might mean the difference between guilty and innocent. I agree with the Supreme Court because it is illegal to access private property without a warrant or consent. The case lasted until June 19, 1961.

    Read More

  • Billy Greenwood And Dyanne Van Houten Summary

    602 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1988, California v. Billy Greenwood and Dyanne Van Houten was about a suspecting of selling and using drugs in Mr. Greenwood house a narcotic officer told the man to bring her the trash bag which Greenwood had placed out the street for pick up, but as the officer search the bags she found drug paraphernalia which was used as evidence to convict Mr. Greenwood but the lower court revoked it because she search the trash bag without a warrant and that was a violation of the fourth amendment. but the trash bags was placed on the street were any child or animal can unseal it so he could not argue about his privacy if it was out in the police for anything or any person to expose the content of the bags but the court stated “ the police cannot reasonably be expected to avert their eyes from evidence of criminal activity that could have been observed by any member of the public “ this means

    Read More

  • Criminal Case Study Margaret Maloney

    640 Words  | 3 Pages

    Advised of a neighbor disturbance. Margaret Maloney called the Comm. Center and stated her neighbor Travis Beam, is harassing her. I asked what he did. She related when she walked outside he was on the porch and yelled "shut the fuck up."

    Read More

  • New Jersey Vs Tlo Case Study

    646 Words  | 3 Pages

    The issue before the court was the question, “Was her Fourth Amendment right violated by school

    Read More

  • 4th Amendment: The Hudson V. Palmer Case

    496 Words  | 2 Pages

    The 4th amendment states that the right to privacy should not by violated by conducting unreasonable searches and seizures. In the hudson v. Palmer case, an inmate named Russel Palmer sued Ted Hudson who was an officer at the Virginia prison. Palmer stated that the officer had conducted a shakedown of his locker and cell in the attempt to find hidden contraband. After the search turned out to be unsuccessful, Officer Hudson, then charged Palmer for destroying state property, as they found a ripped pillow case in his cell. Ted Hudson won the case, as the court stated that the right to privacy does not apply within a prison cell.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Cases: The Mapp V. Ohio Case

    621 Words  | 3 Pages

    Police believed that Mapp was harboring a suspected bomber, and demanded entry. No suspect was found, but police discovered a trunk of obscene pictures in Mapp 's basement. Mapp was arrested for possessing the pictures, and was convicted in an Ohio court where she lost the case in fighting her for first amendment rights. Then, Mapp argued that her Fourth Amendment rights had been violated by the search of the officers and got her case taken to the U.S. Supreme Court where she won. At the time of the case, unlawfully seized evidence was banned from federal courts but not state courts, meaning that the evidence found in Mapp’s home was used against her in the Ohio court, but not the U.S. Supreme Court.

    Read More

  • Wolf V. Colorado Case Brief

    584 Words  | 3 Pages

    The police violated Wolf’s rights and since there was no warrant for arrest or warrant to search his office the police was trespassing. The police officer who violated his rights was to be punished by his superiors. The judges decided that using such evidence goes completely against the Fourth Amendment which is a basic need to our freedom. States should follow this law but are not directly forced to. States using evidence that should be excluded in their “statute becomes a form, and its protection an illusion,”(Wolf v Colorado, 1949).

    Read More

  • Dk Dbq Analysis

    742 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to the Fourth Amendment, people have the right to be secure in their private property, and may only be searched with probable cause. However, in a recent case, this right was violated by the government. An Oregon citizen, with the initials of DLK, was suspected of growing marijuana in his home. The federal government used a thermal imager to scan his home, and were later given a warrant to physically search his home. However, many remain divided over whether or not this scan was constitutional, as there was no warrant at the time of the scan.

    Read More

  • Tlo Vs New Jersey Case Summary

    424 Words  | 2 Pages

    Case: New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) Facts: A high school freshman (T.L.O) had her purse searched by the Assistant Vice Principal at her school because a teacher found her and another student smoking in the lavatory. The Assistant Vice Principal uncovered cigarettes and marijuana. Procedural history: T.L.O. motioned to suppress the evidence because her Fourth Amendment rights were violated and was denied by the Juvenile Court stating the search was reasonable. The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court agreed there was no violation of the Fourth Amendment. The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the decision stating the search was unreasonable.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment

    427 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Verdict discussed how both cases were attempting to suppress evidence from their cell phones which now contain much more information than they once did. Cases like this continue to shape our rights. The fourth amendment is here to protect ourselves from being incriminated. In modern day the fourth amendment is in question due to new technology.

    Read More

  • Mapp Vs Ohio Case Study

    1872 Words  | 8 Pages

    41. Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The Supreme Court ruling that decided that the fourth amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures must be extended to the states. If there is no probable cause or search warrant issued legally, the evidence found unconstitutionally will be inadmissible in the courtroom and not even considered when pressing charges. The exclusionary rule, in this case, is a right that will restrict the states and not just the federal government, including the states in more of the federal rights as outlined in the Constitution.

    Read More

More about What Crime Is Ms. Mapp Case Related?

Open Document