ipl-logo

What Is Horace Greeley A Turning Point For The Civil War

510 Words3 Pages

In 1833, Great Brittan finally took action to abolish its malevolent tradition of African slavery decades before the United States and did not even need to have a war over the matter. This is because unlike the United States mother Country, England did not start out with slavery so convoluted with the country’s way of life. When Civil War commenced, it started out as a fight to keep the nation intact instead of splitting up but shortly over the course of the war the sense shifted towards the concerns of African American slavery throughout the nation. This war served as the beginning of the turning point in the undisputed favoritism towards slavery in the nation. And because this was only the beginning, a majority of Northerners and Southerners …show more content…

When Horace Greeley, an avid supporter of the president and renowned editor of the New York tribune challenged the president to free the slaves the president responded to him with a personal letter in august of 1862. Within the letter Lincoln acknowledges that Greeley means good intentions uttering that, “As to the policy I “seem to be pursuing” as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.” Throughout the letter Lincoln then tries to explain to Greeley his intentions for the war, “I would Save the Union. I would have save it the shortest way under the constitution… If there be those who would not save the Union, unless they could at the same time destroy slavery, I do not agree with them.” With this being said, President Abraham Lincoln was one of the few who kept the nations ongoing insecurity of slavery in mind. Knowing that there were still Americans throughout the Union that still preferred slavery but neglected their preferences for the sake of the Union. In light of the president’s presumptions on the focused intentions of the civil war, we observe the thoughts of Americans on the topic of slavery in the 1860’s. From the New York Harold in 1862, “what to Do with the Slaves when Emancipated,” the article reveals, “The policy of the abolitionists would be destructive: That of the President is benign.” Because this article presented by Northerners argues that the removal of slavery would harm the nation and provide further logic on why African Americans should be kept as slaves averting the possibility of whites performing the slave’s

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Apostles Of Disunion By Charles B. Dew

    761 Words  | 4 Pages

    The nineteenth century was one the most remarkable period in American history. For it was the century of the Market Revolution as well as the Civil War. The war took millions of lives of innocent people, who either tried to eliminate or defend slavery. The Civil War seemed to be revolved around slavery. However, slavery was not the only causation.

    Read More

  • George Washington In Henry Wiencek's An Imperfect God

    1241 Words  | 5 Pages

    Washington was joined by slaves while leading the Continental Army in the field of battle, as well as during his time as president. Yet Wiencek also argues that the Revolution and the establishment of the new democracy changed Washington’s beliefs on slavery. By the end of his life, Washington had changed completely and “sickened by slavery, willing to sacrifice his own substance to end it.” (Wiencek 274) Many of the founding fathers recognized the problems created by slavery.

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln And Frederick Douglass Relationship Essay

    976 Words  | 4 Pages

    James Oakes’ political analysis of the relationship between Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass is an intricate one. He pursues the duos; a frontier lawyer and a former slave, the president and the most sought after black, the shrewd politician and an agile reformer who are carefully engaged in the context of political succession, emancipation and civil war in the 19th century. Being a prime time when slavery is a fiercely contested issue, the two closely associate in the bold spectrum, differing and agreeing, disregarding and approving each other in different instances, with Oakes ultimately drawing their paths through the epic transformation. This paper seeks out Douglass’ and Lincoln’s approaches that shift some positions in slavery abolition in 19th century America.

    Read More

  • Assessing Response Of Northern Opinion To The Dred Scott Decision

    1403 Words  | 6 Pages

    With reference to the sources and your understanding of the historical context, which of these two sources is more valuable in assessing the response of northern opinion to the Dred Scott decision? The argument of Extract 1 is that the Dred Scott decision was constitutional, Unionist and fully ‘rebuked’ Northern abolitionism. Although this Extract is of some value, this value is significantly limited in terms of assessing the response of northern opinion to the Dred Scott decision. The Richmond Enquirer notes that the question of slavery had been ‘decided emphatically.’

    Read More

  • Summary Of Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation

    882 Words  | 4 Pages

    ’s Thesis was centered around the idea that Lincoln viewed emancipation as “a goal to be achieved through prudential means, so that worthwhile consequences might result.” He argued that every gradual step Lincoln took towards the abolition of slavery was done to “balance the integrity of ends with the integrity of means,” to accomplish this while still placing the constitution above all of his personal opinions. Guelzo then presented and answered four questions that he believed arose as a result of his prudence argument; why is the language of the Proclamation bland, did the Proclamation actually do anything, did the slaves free themselves, and finally did Lincoln issue the Proclamation to only to prevent European intervention or inflate Union morale? In response to the first, Guelzo makes the point that the Proclamation was a legal document, and that “every syllable was liable to… legal

    Read More

  • Lincoln Racist Dbq

    867 Words  | 4 Pages

    You can see this in Document B, wherein 1858 Lincoln says this: “I have no purpose . . . to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists . . .” Later on in the same document he also states, “There is no reason in the world why the negro is not entitled to all the natural rights . . . in the Declaration of Independence- the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” While Lincoln was running for president, he promised to leave slavery alone in the South, but he also stays true to his personal morals through his time, that slavery

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq Analysis

    700 Words  | 3 Pages

    The civil war began in the year of 1861, many historians have established theories for the main cause. Four of the possible theories include, morality and views on slavery, two societies, failure to compromise, states rights and Lincoln's election. Although all of these play a big role in the causes of the civil war, I believe the principle cause of the civil war was, the existence of two societies in the United States beacuse the South wanted to become more independent, had multiple uprisings due to slavery, and had differnt oppions on slavery. America was split into the North and the South, both very diverse. Some might say that the North was very independent and the south was very dependent on the north.

    Read More

  • The Abolition Of Slavery Dbq

    156 Words  | 1 Pages

    America was no longer a society with slaves, but especially in areas of the deep south, had become a slave society. Paternalistic value embedded in the deep south slave society culture was arguably the cherry on the cake of an unattainable compromise. Americans referred to the abolition of slavery as unconstitutional, necessary to life and permanent. This thought is expanded upon by David Wilmot as he argues, “I ask not that slavery be abolished. I demand that this Government preserve the integrity of free territory against the aggressions of slavery against its wrongful usurpations”

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln Moral Leadership Essay

    672 Words  | 3 Pages

    This historical study will define the moral leadership of Abraham Lincoln’s role as president during the Civil War. Lincoln’s role as an anti-Slavery supported in the north provided the necessary moral leadership to sustain a complex war involving the continued argument about the continued existence of the institution of slavery. In this context, Lincoln had not previously been a supporter of the northern abolitionist movements before becoming president, yet throughout the Civil War, he incrementally began to realize the political and moral implications of slavery as a dire threat to American freedoms. Lincoln’s opposition to slavery during his presidency defined a major change in U.S. history, which galvanized the North to challenge the dominance of pro-slavery in the South. This commitment to ending slavery formed the foundation of Lincoln’s role as a liberator of African-American slaves as a defining factor of the war.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Melvin E Bradford's 'Remembering Who We Are'

    824 Words  | 4 Pages

    Not Who You Believe Him To Be President Lincoln is viewed as one of America’s greatest presidents. Although this is believed to be true, that is not the case. President Lincoln had many faults within his term, that started right before the Civil War. In the story Remembering Who We Are: Observations of a Southern Conservative written by Melvin E. Bradford, talks about five keys points as to why Abraham Lincoln was not America’s greatest president. Starting with Lincoln’s well known legacy; his name was simply just that, but without the help of others in his life he would of been no one.

    Read More

  • How Did Abraham Lincoln Deserve To Be The Great Emancipator

    695 Words  | 3 Pages

    President Lincoln stated that: “if I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it,..., and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would do it.”. This quote clearly shows that the freedom of slaves was not his concern and unnecessary if it did not help the Union; as the result, slavery still exists if there is no war. Free slave from bondage should be a Great Emancipator’s primary goal and he will do his best to achieve it no matter what, but president Lincoln’s thought differed from that because all he cares was the Union. Although he had many times admitting himself an anti-slavery but his words and thoughts obviously prove that he is

    Read More

  • Was Abraham Lincoln An Abolitionist?

    369 Words  | 2 Pages

    A common controversy in American history is the fact that Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves. Many claim that he freed them with the Emancipation Proclamation but it’s more complex than that. There were many events that helped free slaves and the Emancipation was only a small portion of America’s journey to freedom and “equality”. In reality, Lincoln helped the process of freeing the slaves but, he did not do it himself. Lincoln was not an abolitionist.

    Read More

  • Meaning Of The July Fourth For The Negro By Frederick Douglass

    1110 Words  | 5 Pages

    One of the strategies Douglass uses to convince his audience slavery should be abolished is by “calling out American hypocrisy in his Fourth of July oration” (Mercieca 1). He shames them with no remorse. He speaks on the opposite treatments that enable whites to live in a state of freedom and liberty, while the blacks are living in a state of bondage. As the audience listens, he reminds them, there are men, women and children still held hostages to the chains of

    Read More

  • Summary Of Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation

    869 Words  | 4 Pages

    On September 2nd, 1862, Abraham Lincoln famously signed the Emancipation Proclamation. After that, there’s been much debate on whether Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation truly played a role in freeing the slaves with many arguments opposing or favoring this issue. In Vincent Harding’s essay, The Blood-red Ironies of God, Harding argues in his thesis that Lincoln did not help to emancipate the slaves but that rather the slaves “self-emancipated” themselves through the war. On the opposition, Allen C Guelzo ’s essay, Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America, argues in favor of the Emancipation Proclamation and Guelzo acknowledges Lincoln for the abolishment of slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Slavery In The Civil War

    1064 Words  | 5 Pages

    “...On the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free.” The bold action of Lincoln lead to other attempts at equalizing black people with white people but one does have to question the motives of many white Anti-slavery advocates. White people had been the majority in American society during this time and never had to worry about discrimination or slavery so why were they fighting so hard for and with slaves? The white people of America never act unless they have something in it for themselves. By abolishing slavery, white anti-slavery movement supporters gained the benefits of not having to deal the major disconnect between the country, ______,

    Read More

More about What Is Horace Greeley A Turning Point For The Civil War

Open Document