Although many are unaware of it, scientific ethics have always been a major issue, especially in the United States. This was especially the case of Henrietta Lacks and her family through the early 1950s to present day. Henrietta Lacks hurried into John Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland to find out why there was a lump on her cervix. When doctors diagnosed her with cervical cancer, she filled out a form giving consent to let the doctors perform any surgery they deemed necessary. Soon after Henrietta died in October of 1951, her husband, David (Day) Lacks, signed a consent form to let them perform an autopsy on her corpse. However, neither of them knew the full details behind the forms and both thought they were agreeing to something …show more content…
Mary Kubicek, an innocent bystander, observed Henrietta’s autopsy. In Skloot’s book, Mary says, “’When I saw those tenails…I nearly fainted. I thought, Oh jeez, she’s a real person. I started imagining her sitting in her bathroom painting those toenails, and it hit me for the first time that those cells we’d been working with all this time and sending all over the world, they came from a live woman. I’d never thought of it that way’”(The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, chapter 21, The Storm p. 91). By including this quote in her book, Skloot allows readers to infer that nobody actually realized, or cared, that HeLa was not just a cell culture. She was an actual human …show more content…
Moore had hairy-cell leukemia, a rare and deadly cancer that filled his spleen with malignant blood cells until it bulged like an overfilled inner tube (The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, chapter 25, Who Told You You Could Sell My Spleen? p. 199). Golde told him that the only way to get rid of the cancer was to remove his spleen for good. However, Moore became suspicious of Golde for making him take continuous trips from Seattle to Los Angeles years after his surgery. Soon, Moore found out that Golde had devoted much of the seven years since Moore’s surgery to developing and marketing a cell line called Mo (The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, chapter 25, Who Told You You Could Sell My Spleen? p. 201). Unlike Henrietta and her family though, John Moore knew exactly who patented his cells. However, similarly to her, he too did not receive any of the stocks or financing, which, at the time, was estimated to be more than $3.5 million. The market value for Mo was even higher, calculated to be more than $3
Henrietta’s cell helped us fight a lot of diseases just because her cells
Henrietta Lacks was a poor black tobacco farmer,born in Roanoke, Virginia on August 1 ,1920.Henrietta’s mother died when Henrietta was very young, her dad did not wanted to take care of her and her siblings, so they were sent with different relatives. She grew up with her grandfather. Henrietta died at age of 31 years old of cervical cancer, on October 4, 1951. At the age of twenty-nine she felt a “knot” inside of her. In the year of 1950, she had a full-fledged tumor just three months after she had felt the knot.
As shown in the award-winning book by author Rebecca Skloot: The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, a mother by the name of Henrietta’s cells caused scientific commotion, without her or her family even knowing it. Although the HeLa cell brought many incredible scientific discoveries, Henrietta and her family were manipulated while companies made profits. Although
Back in the day doctors believed that non-doctors could never understand since they didn’t go to college or medical school. In result doctors never explained to patient’s their procedures, and they weren’t forced to by any law. Hopkins was one of the few hospitals that treated black patients. The Lack’s and poor uneducated black families went to Hopkins and put all their faith in the doctors. They had no idea that they were being experimented on.
In a way I agree with the Lacks cousins because Henrietta’s cells are still living today. When HeLa cells were slowly began taking over and research growth began to grow many places began to grow and sell the cells to others. One example was the Microbiological Associates. The Microbiological Associates did not have had the right to produce and sell the Henrietta cells. All that they were doing selling the cells and earning money for it.
The Lacks family did not trust the research doctors for not receiving their consent upon taking her cells. In addition, the doctors at Hopkins hospital were doing this to many African-American families. They were called “night doctors” because African-Americans believed they kidnapped African Americans at night, so they could do research on their bodies. New cases up to the end of the twentieth century surfaced stating that Hopkins Hospital were running unethical test on African-American
Many accomplishments have been made in healthcare efforts in the last few decades; but unknowingly these accomplishments came from the sacrifice of other individuals. In the case of Henrietta Lacks, she was not even aware what she had given up. As Lacks was dying from aggressive ovarian cancer, samples of her tumor cells were taken without her knowledge or consent. The researcher, who obtained them, George Gey, uncaringly acquired them for the benefit of his lab work. This act eventually turned his profession around making him a well-known wealthy scientist.
HeLa has made a great contribution to the way that the world sees and learns about cells. The HeLa cells have a astonishing story behind them. This story starts with a women names Henrietta Lacks. In the book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks Rebecca Skloot told us the journey of the Lacks family and pointed out many ethical problems throughout the book. The issue of race was what stood out the most to me as I was reading.
Lance Langel 11/18/14 P.8 Bibliography Fahy, D., & Nisbet, M. C. (2013). Bioethics in popular sciance: evaluating the medica impact of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks in the biobank debate .Retrievedfrombiomedcentralhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1472- 6939/14/1 Due to biobanks, there has been many bioethical concerns regarding, disclosure, ownership, privacy, control, and consent. As an opportunity to engage an audience about these ethical issues, bioethicists have used Rebecca Skloot's book "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks" (Fahy & Nisbet, 2013). To engage the audience, researchers conducted an analysis of relevant articles and transcripts produced by organizations and publications in the U.S. and in other countries (Fahy & Nisbet,
Henrietta was not treated with respect, her and her family were put in harm, and the situation was extremely unjust. The actions of the scientists would have been effective and even necessary, if they received permission to act. The actions that they took were an infringement on Henrietta’s life and Henrietta and her family were lucky that years later, they were able to receive
In August of 2013, Talha Khan Burki wrote “Righting a Long-standing Wrong for Henrietta Lacks” for Lancet Oncology. Burki’s purpose was to highlight the problem with the sequence data of patients’ cells (namely, Henrietta Lacks) being publicly released and to inform people of the privacy risks involved. Burki did a very good job at explaining what the issue was, what had been done about it and what needed to happen. Generally, readers struggle and become overwhelmed when they see a large sum of information all at one time. However, while this article provides the reader with several facts, it makes the reader think and Burki did a very well at writing in a manner that prior knowledge of certain terms or concepts are not critical to comprehending.
The story of Henrietta Lacks involves an extreme violation of privacy. The book describes and discusses issues related to access of personal information from medical records, use of tissue samples, informed consent, and privacy invasion. These are issues that have raised debate, and are of concerns to me as a social worker. Other significant issues in this book relate to a lack of respect for Henrietta Lacks and her family, as well as justice, race, and social class. Being a social worker and reading this book made me so upset.
This eventually led to a family member becoming so stressed and worn out from this ordeal that she had a stroke. The publicity could have been wonderful, but the press cared about the cells, and the cells only. The family had to protect the reputation of Henrietta as a person. They did not want her to be remembered solely for having the first immortal cells. Therefore, they did not talk to the press and kept to themselves until they were approached by the right person.
In 1951, at the age of 31 Henrietta Lacks was diagnosed with cervical cancer. Henrietta was under treatment at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, where cells from her malignant tumor were removed. Neither Henrietta nor any of her family members knew about the tissue sample and nor did the Hopkins ever informed them of the situation. Unfortunately after Henrietta’s radiation treatment, her condition continued to worsen and soon she lost her battle to cancer on octomber 4th 1951. Henriettas cells left the Hopkins what they discovered to be known to be the first immortal human cell line.
Participation Portfolio 1 Asst 3: Henrietta Lacks Discussion Questions Please answers each of the following questions, and be prepared to discuss in class 1. Please outline the history of Henrietta Lacks 's tissue cells. Who did what with the cells, when, where and for what purpose? Who benefited, scientifically, medically, and monetarily?