What Was The Role Of Anti-Communist Leaders In The 1950's

Other presidents were also able to establish antitrust reforms. President Woodrow Wilson established the Federal Trade Commission Act, aimed to prevent monopoly, and the Clayton Antitrust Bill. As Document E illustrates, the Clayton Antitrust Bill claims it unlawful to "lessen competition” or “tend to create a monopoly in any line of commerce". Although Presidents Roosevelt and Wilson established reforms to stop monopoly, they still had many holes in their trust-busting campaign which severely limited the full effects of

Roland Reagan came into the office during his first term hoping to use his administration to fight communism and end the Cold War. He finds out it was not easy as he thought. So, in his second term he turned to a different strategy getting to know someone like Gorbachev. The conservatives thought he was making a mistake. Roland Reagan’s success finally proved to the conservatives that his friendship with Gorbachev was not a dupe.

Theodore Roosevelt's anti-trust act stopped robber barons in their track's. The Anti-Sherman Trust Act wast the first act to outlaw monopolistic businesses which is reducing the fair market competition of enterprises and monopolies. Theodore Roosevelt sued J.P. Morgan for bad trust's and won the case in The Supreme Court. This was a turning point in America because robber barons didn't own America anymore. It was a time of greed, corruption, and broken capitalism was common in America.

The idea that Communist were taking over America was greatly exaggerated and proves the Second Red Scare was based upon hysteria and Communism posed no real threat to American politics. The second example that proves the

The most radical administration since Reconstruction (1866-1877) was that of Franklin D. Roosevelt and his New Deal (1933-1945) which aimed to get America out of its deepest economic depression. The New Deal intended to bring welfare relief to impoverished and destitute Americans, although the New Deal transformed the United States and the status of politics at the time – as it refined the role of the federal and state governments, black Americans did not always directly benefit from it as an anti-lynching law was never passed. President Roosevelt’s failure to pass anti-lynching legislation was mainly because of his inability to overcome his political fears. Lack of presidential support does not fully explain President Roosevelt’s failure to

It’s hard to defer whether or not John Adams was an effective president because, although many historians believe that Adams was correct in not expanding the naval war with France into a conflict which saved many people’s lives, there were things that he established and believed that completely contradicted the newly established constitution. This could’ve put America into jeopardy. These things included the belief that the executive branch should stand above politics, his agreement to sign the Alien and Sedition Acts, and the fact that mostly of the people in the United States, including his own party, turned away from his ideas, which definitely did not make him the most effective president. Much of Adam’s isolation reflected a well conceived

In 1957, Johnson did support a federal law on voting rights, but the final bill was so watered down it had little to no effect. In document B it says “Do you approve or disapprove of the way Lyndon Johnson is handling the civil rights problem?” Over 50% approve that he is. But if he didn’t take action the law might not of even have passed.

The late 1950’s through the early 1960’s saw much change in government policies in regard to segregation. We grew as a nation it was necessary to bring an end to legal segregation. 1952 brought us a new President in Eisenhower who succeeded President Truman. His leadership style of governing was generally moderate and he believed in less government involvement in people’s lives domestically. He resisted the expansion of the Federal Government’s power, and he was very standoffish when the Supreme Court ordered school segregation.

“As Senate Majority leader, Lyndon Johnson did not directly oppose the 1957 civil rights bill” (Chicago Tribune 417). Now that he is president, though, he has changed his mind to strongly enforce federal civil rights. stumbles over his past behavior in 1957, so now people distrust his sincerity in 1964 (Chicago Tribune 417). He used to think the states should control civil rights and now he’s pushing for it to be the federal government’s responsibility. This choice is causing him to “stumble” over what he believed in just years

The conservatives and other people who supported the isolationist policy in the early 1950s held it that these disruptors were the liberals and the elites from the east who had no idea and mercy on the Americans (Brands, 2011). Another reason why many conservatives backed the policy was the fact that they were viewed as harmless people who could be ruled and their decisions be ignored by the elites from the east who won in every act of decision

Of course the government had to do something to calm the people, show them there was nothing to worry about. That is what President Harry Truman attempted to do. The article states, “President Harry S. Truman established a program to investigate federal government employees. Employees who were suspected of harboring Communist party loyalties were tried by a Loyalty Board. The purpose of these investigations was to ensure loyalty to the United States, but the system was not without flaws.

Now back in the 50s, communism was an event that if you were just simply accused of being a communist no one would

Thomas Jefferson once said. “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties”. The reason he said this was because he feared a strong central government. Then for some Americans, fears of a strong central government taking advantage came true. This is when the two political parties split.

They were trying to make Miller confess for something he hadn’t done, similar to what happened to John Procter in the crucible . This is another quote of Miller reflecting about his experiences with H.U.A.C,” I have made more friends for American culture than the State Department. Certainly I have made fewer enemies, but that isn 't very difficult.” Well any ways after the encounter Miller had with the H.U.A.C , the H.U.A.C convicted Miller of contempt of Congress , this conviction was later reversed around 1958. Miller refused to testify and his punishment was that he was blacklisted by Hollywood , this impacted his career allot.

The first major change this event brought to American government and politics was there was a shift of power without bloodshed. The shift from John Adams, a Federalist, as president, to electing Thomas Jefferson, a new Republican candidate, caused minor bickering within Congress but there was no uproar about the change in government. This was very different from America’s past. When the colonies tried to change their government when the British were in control, war broke out and it caused a divide in America between Patriots and Loyalists. No such divisions was so harshly created.