ipl-logo

What Was The Significance Of The Compromise Of 1850

702 Words3 Pages

10. Kansas-Nebraska Act – The Kansas-Nebraska Act split the Nebraska territory into two territories comprising of Nebraska and Kansas. They hoped that by doing this one state would be free and the other slave. They would decide what kind of state they would be through popular sovereignty. The act served to repeal the Missouri Compromise. The significance of this is that it caused conflict and repealed the Missouri Compromise. 11. Compromise of 1850 – The compromise was presented by Henry Clay. The Compromise stated five different things. One, California would enter as a free state. Second, stricter fugitive slave laws. Third, popular sovereignty decides the problem about slavery in the state. Finally, slavery was allowed in D.C but the slave …show more content…

Dred Scott Decision – Was a trial between a slave and his owner. The master moved to a free state and kept a slave even though they had entered a free state. In the end, they ruled in the favor of the master. This decision stated that slaves are just property and can be moved from place to place and still be bound to the master. The significance of this is that it made the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional. 14. Abraham Lincoln – ran for a seat in the Senate and later became president. Lincoln was a Republican candidate that opposed slavery expansion and opposed the Dred Scott decision. He and Stephen Douglas had debates referred to as the Lincoln – Douglas debates. He was president during the civil war and approved the 13 amendment that freed slaves. The significance of this man is that he was a president and did many important things. 15. Stephen Douglas – Ran for a seat in the Senate and beat Lincoln for it by a slim margin. He also ran for president but didn’t win the presidency. He supported texas as a slave state and popular sovereignty. He was not supported by northerners. The significance of this man is that he was a senate member and almost …show more content…

Election of 1860 – The election of 1860 was between four different men. Lincoln a Republican who didn’t want slavery to expand. Douglas was a democrat that focused on popular sovereignty. John Bell was a unionist that wanted the north and south to remain together. Then finally John Breckinridge was a pro-slavery Democrat. The significance of this is that Lincoln became president even though he didn’t get any votes from southern states. 18. Popular Sovereignty – is the principle that the authority of a state and its government is created and sustained by the consent of its people, through their elected representatives. It is closely associated with social contract philosophers such as John Locke. During the time period, popular sovereignty was used to decide if slavery should be allowed in that state. The significance of this is that it decided how the state would function. 19. Southern Secession – Southern Secession was caused by one major dispute. The north and south had long-standing debates about slavery. The war officially started when Confederates attacked Fort Sumpter. This caused the south to secede and split the states between the union and the Confederacy. The significance of the Southern Secession is that it caused the America to split and start the civil

Show More
Related

  • The Lincoln-Douglas Debates Of Abraham Lincoln And Stephen A. Douglas

    544 Words  | 3 Pages

    Douglas's senate. He was a Republican. With the Lincoln-Douglas Debates going on and plus Douglas's political nature that had been going on, the campaign started to attracted people from everywhere all over the nation. A lot of the people who heard about the Lincoln-Douglas Debates thought the Democratic party was going to keep hold of the unity and face the State rights and the Slave issues. Other thought that the Lincoln-Douglas Debates were going to help the union itself.

    Read More

  • Charles Grandison Finney, A Woman's Rights Activist

    499 Words  | 2 Pages

    Questions for Days 131-150: 1. Charles Grandison Finney was an evangelist who was a preacher who helped in religiously reviving Americans. He was the first of the professional evangelists. 2. Dorothea Dix was a crusader who supported mentally impaired people.

    Read More

  • How Did Stephen Douglass Encourage The Support Of Popular Sovereignty

    667 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stephen Douglas, an advocate of popular sovereignty, and Abraham Lincoln, a Republican candidate, were both running to represent Illinois in the United States Senate. These two men met in a sequence of seven debates before they battled for office of presidency in the election of 1858. Slavery eventually became the main issue discussed repeatedly in each of the debates, due to the Mexican War adding new territories left to be assessed as free soil or not. During this time, the Compromise of 1850 was a temporary fix to the sectional issues for the states that made the decision to participate in the extension of slavery. However, the Missouri Compromise of 1854 brought the issue back up again.

    Read More

  • Why The Compromise Of 1850 Failed

    175 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

    Read More

  • How Did The Dred Scott Trial Impact The United States?

    1614 Words  | 7 Pages

    Dred Scott, one of the most famous and iconic figures in American history, impacted the United Sates by causing awareness and a voice to not only the free black people living during that time, but slaves as well. Other than Marbury v. Madison case, the Dred Scott Trial declared a federal law unconstitutional, prior to the civil war. The case brought to light a topic that would soon explode-slavery. Many scholars believe that it is what brought the United States closer to the civil war and the case actually inspired the Republican party to rise. Dred Scott’s case was controversial because a slave in his time period had never gone to Scott’s extent to fight for his freedom and it inspired not only slaves, but those who advocated to end slavery

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln's Electical Essay: The Election Of 1864

    835 Words  | 4 Pages

    The leader of an entire nation and its military forces needs to have a certain intuition and connection with its country. Without this, the leader would seem more like a ruler, which is why electing a president is a more appealing choice to most Americans. In the election of 1864, the fate of our whole country was indirectly affected by the outcome. 3 years into the Civil war, the union was electing, or reelecting, its new president. Abraham Lincoln and George McClellan both ran for president in 1864, but Lincoln came out on top after a very long fight to win for the presidency.

    Read More

  • What Was The Actual Compromise Of 1850

    1866 Words  | 8 Pages

    The Actual Compromise The actual compromise had multiple provisions. The Compromise of 1850 called for the admission of California as a free state; the strengthening of the Fugitive Slave Law; popular sovereignty in Utah and New Mexico concerning the question of slavery; the abolition of the slave trade in D.C.; and the federal assumption of Texas’s debt.   The first one we will discuss is how Texas would have to surrender control of land in exchange for ten million dollars.

    Read More

  • Emancipation Proclamation Was A Turning Point Essay

    1198 Words  | 5 Pages

    The institution of slavery was a vital part of the growth, economy, and politics in the United States from the early colonial era to the climax of the Civil War. The end of slavery came in a tide of reform resulting in the liberation of over four million slaves. The confluence of the political developments in 1861 and the changing ideological currents brought on by the Civil War impacted the United States for many years to come and brought slavery to an end. On March 4, 1861, Abraham Lincoln was elected the 16th president of the United States. He was the first Republican candidate to win the presidency with only forty percent of the popular vote.

    Read More

  • How Did Slavery Cause Secession

    1451 Words  | 6 Pages

    ‘Slavery was the root cause of secession’. ‘November 6 1860, Lincoln was elected president of America which resulted in panic emerging in the South’ . The election of Lincoln as president who was a Republican leader meant that ideologies, movements and values from the North would be implemented in the South which meant the abolition of slavery. Slavery was a huge characteristic of the South as the economy; politics; social status and psychological mind-sets were influenced by the process of slavery. The southern white population then derived the idea of secession which meant the South would gain independence from Northern aggression .

    Read More

  • Three-Fifths Compromise In The Constitution And The Civil War

    437 Words  | 2 Pages

    The continual debate over the institution of slavery, part of the debate over states’ rights versus the federal government’s power, was one of the factors

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Compromise Of 1850

    328 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Compromise of 1850 was an effort by the United States Congress that was drafted by Henry Clay, who was both the U.S. Senator and the House Representative of Kentucky. This compromise was a series of acts passed in 1850, attempted to reconcile Northern and Southern interests to preserve the Civil War. After the start of the Mexican-American War, conflicts about whether to allow slavery in those new territories to polarized Northern and Southern of the United States raised up. Northerners were in favor the Compromise, since they thought it’s a good chance to stop slavery. On the other hand, Southerners were against it, they thought it threatened their political power because the join of territory--California would disturb the balance of 15 free states and 15 slave states.

    Read More

  • Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

    1121 Words  | 5 Pages

    Slavery was one of the biggest problems between 1820 and 1860. Sometimes two states had to be added to the Union at the same time, to make things fair. The North and the South fought almost constantly over the issue of slavery, sometimes things were able to be worked out about it, but as the years passed, the problems with slavery and territory started to become too big to ignore or

    Read More

  • How Did The Great War Changed The Relationship Between England And Its American Colonies

    1131 Words  | 5 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln would lead the Republican Party even though he did not win the south over in the election. He promised that he would save the Union no matter what the cost. This disconnect in policy would later lay the basis for the Civil War, which started in 1861. He never envisioned a proclamation or ending slavery but he was ultimately committed to saving the Union from the succeeding south. Lincoln gave into the antislavery Republicans toward the end of the war and finally decided to make slavery the true basis of the war.

    Read More

  • Southern Nationalism In The Civil War

    1668 Words  | 7 Pages

    Constitution and altered it by explicitly protecting the institution of slavery. This peculiar institution was what made the Confederacy unique. Sectionalism over economic, social, political, and constitutional issues regarding slavery continued from Buchanan’s inauguration in 1857 until secession after Lincoln’s election in 1860. “The expansion of slavery into western territories provided the catalyst for the growing perceptions of northerners and southerners that they held different intentions of the republic’s future.” “In the South, loyalty to slavery and its required expansion became the hallmark of party politics as the region’s politicians—Whigs, Know-Nothing, and Democrat—competed to demonstrate their loyalty to southern rights.”

    Read More

  • Did Slavery Cause The Civil War Essay

    604 Words  | 3 Pages

    This including the electing of Abraham Lincoln made the southern states feel like they were going to lose control of the political choices in the southern territories, which would have lead to them not having control over their area in general (American Civil War History). These events are all effects where the underlying problem was the conflict of slavery that was between the north and south states. Showing how much of a factor it was during the civil war era. Making it one of the largest causes of why the civil war broke

    Read More

More about What Was The Significance Of The Compromise Of 1850

Open Document