ipl-logo

Why Is Jim Crow Law Unfair

498 Words2 Pages

Jim Crow Law
Jim Crow laws are about power. Power of one race over another. These laws that had happened showed the weakness and over power that each different race had. In this essay it will highlight the beneficial of the importance to how jim crow law shows unfairness between both race.
First of all jim crow law is very unfair to both different race because buses that were invented back then,jim crow laws had stated that whites had to be separated from the colored skins to be able to get their tickets. According to the textbook of jim crow laws it provided a text stating law 2 “Buses All passenger stations in this state operated by any motor transportation company shall have separate waiting rooms or space and separate ticket windows for the white and the colored races. Alabama” this passage explains that even getting tickets for buses had separated both race. In my own thinking i know that the colored skinned people would sit in the back portion of the bus while the whites have the best seat in front of the bus. This was very unfair because even though buses the whites had more …show more content…

In the text law 17 “Prisons The warden shall see that the white convicts shall have separate apartments for both eating and sleeping from the Negro convicts. Mississippi.” Meaning whites are probably are favored and is specialized in special ways in prison unlike the colored skins are.
In conclusion the jim crow law is very unfair to both different race because of the examples i had given that through education , prison and buses they are divided through everything. Everything was very unfair because of the jim crow laws because to how one race had much more power and had much power against the other race. This essay covered the main points that the jim crow law is unfair and is not the fairness and acceptable way to treat both or more religions of

Show More
Related

  • Review Of C. Vann Woodward's The Strange Career Of Jim Crow

    1251 Words  | 6 Pages

    Vann Woodward discusses the downfall of the Jim Crow Laws. In 1954, the Brown v. Board of Education case ruled that segregation of public schools was unlawful. Woodward notes in his book that “the court’s decision of 17 May was the most momentous and far-reaching of the century in civil rights. It reversed a constitutional trend started long before Plessy v. Ferguson, and it marked the beginning of the end of Jim Crow.” Implementation was something new to everyone.

    Read More

  • Jesse Jackson Civil Rights Activist Summary

    754 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Jim Crow Laws were a series of rigid anti-black laws throughout the southern states. These laws follow a belief that whites were superior to blacks (Jim Crow Museum: Origins of Jim Crow 1). Jim Crow was rooted from an African American culture song and made sure that blacks used different schools, prisons, transportation, telephones, housing, bathrooms, and even games. Whites and blacks were never allowed to marry and black were not allowed to vote (American Historama 1). Many states could impose legal punishment if a person with a different race were to consort with a white (Jim Crow Laws 1).

    Read More

  • Summary Of Remembering Jim Crow

    699 Words  | 3 Pages

    Jim Crow was not a person, it was a series of laws that imposed legal segregation between white Americans and African Americans in the American South. It promoting the status “Separate but Equal”, but for the African American community that was not the case. African Americans were continuously ridiculed, and were treated as inferiors. Although slavery was abolished in 1865, the legal segregation of white Americans and African Americans was still a continuing controversial subject and was extended for almost a hundred years (abolished in 1964). Remembering Jim Crow: African Americans Tell About Life in the Segregated South is a series of primary accounts of real people who experienced this era first-hand and was edited by William H.Chafe, Raymond

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Plessy V. Ferguson

    1206 Words  | 5 Pages

    During the mid-to-late-1900s, there was a lot of controversy surrounding race. Although slavery had been abolished around a century ago, many people still did not treat African Americans as equals. Even the supreme court had declared that white people and black people should remain “separate but equal”, in their landmark case Plessy Vs Ferguson (“Separate but Equal - Separate Is Not Equal.”, n.d.). The “separate but equal” doctrine meant that African Americans were to be given separate facilities and opportunities from white people, given that they were equal to each other.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Mob Mentality In To Kill A Mockingbird

    682 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Jim Crow laws were a set of anti-Black laws that could be seen mostly in the southern and border states and demoted Blacks to second-class citizens (Pilgrim). The Whites thought they needed these laws because many people at high positions believed that Blacks’ mental capacity was inferior to Whites (Pilgrim). Whites

    Read More

  • Richard Wright The Ethics Of Living Jim Crow Analysis

    509 Words  | 3 Pages

    “She would impart to me gems of Jim Crow wisdom” (Wright 2). In “The Ethics of Living Jim Crow,” Richard Wright, speaks of his own experiences growing up in the half century after slavery ended, and how the Jim Crow laws had an effect on them. Wright’s experiences support the idea that a black person could not live a life relatively free of conflict even if they adhered to the ethics of Jim Crow. The first experience that Wright describes came when he was only a young boy living in Arkansas. He and his friends had been throwing cinder blocks and they found themselves in a ‘war’ against a group of white boys.

    Read More

  • How Did Jim Crow Laws Justify The Inequity Between Black And White People

    667 Words  | 3 Pages

    For years, laws have justified white supremacy in America, and the oppression of black people as well. Before there were Jim Crow laws, there were black codes. Before there were black codes, there were slave codes. These three things were all used to provide white people with a sense of supremacy and protection, while subjugating and oppressing black people. Slave codes began in 1705 to validate the treatment of black slaves and to divide and conquer.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Jim Crow Laws

    199 Words  | 1 Pages

    As current time and social status are being challenged and pushed, the Jim Crow Laws were implemented. These state and local laws were just legislated this year, 1877. New implemented laws mandate segregation in all public facilities, with a “separate but equal” status for African Americans. This may lead to treatment and accommodations that are inferior to those provided to white Americans, systematizing a number of economic, educational, and social disadvantages.

    Read More

  • Why Do Jim Crow Laws Really Mean Equality?

    1153 Words  | 5 Pages

    Next, equality does not always actually mean equality. What that means is that even when we say equality, that does not always mean that things are fair and equal. Think Jim Crow laws, separate but equal, laws that were, at one time, supported by the U.S. government which legalized segregation on the condition that so long as the facilities such as medical care, housing accommodations, education, employment, services, and transportation provided to each race were equal, local governments could legally segregate them; it also provided "equal protection" under the law to all citizens. As most people know or will find, Jim Crow laws did not actually work this way, in that the facilities that were offered were anything but equal, with people of color, especially black people, receiving services that were completely inadequate and left them with little opportunity of upward mobility and facilities that hardly worked. Despite being promised the equality of their white peers, “blacks were largely denied their rightful share of political power and economic opportunity” (Bloom

    Read More

  • Arguments Against Jim Crow Laws

    53 Words  | 1 Pages

    Jim Crow laws are laws set up to be discriminated against colored people. The believers of the law thought that white people were superior over coloreds. Almost all theorists, and philosophers believed that the blacks were cursed and supposed to be slaves and servants to the whites, all in the name of

    Read More

  • What Is The Jim Crow Era

    520 Words  | 3 Pages

    The U.S. Supreme Court encountered various difficulties in trying to overthrow Jim Crow. After the infamous Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) decision, it makes things difficult for the court to overturn its “separate, but equal” ruling. Heading into the 20th Century, Black civil rights in America, particularly in the South were met with swift opposition. It was in large part due to the Supreme Court ruling that gave those states the power to enforce discriminatory legislation. In Robert J. Cottrol book, “Brown v. Board of Education: Caste, Culture, and the Constitution”, he described the Jim Crow era as it dealt with public education.

    Read More

  • Jim Crow Laws: Unfair And Unjust To African-Americans

    668 Words  | 3 Pages

    5th Hour Cause and Effect Essay Jim Crow laws The Jim Crow laws were unfair and unjust to all African-Americans by making them unequal. The Jim Crow laws are laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States. It used the term separate but equal, even though conditions for African Americans were always worst than their white counterparts. They could not eat at the same restaurant as white people, they could not used the same restrooms, and they couldn't even use the same drinking fountain.

    Read More

  • Separate But Equal: The Jim Crow Laws

    400 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Jim Crow laws claimed to be “Separate but equal”, they were anything but. The laws separated the blacks from the whites. They had separate stores, schools, and even drinking fountains. The Jim Crow laws separated the blacks from the whites, made life harder for the blacks, and when they were separated their stores, restaurants, and other things were not equal.

    Read More

  • A Brief Note On Pluralistic Society In The United States

    1329 Words  | 6 Pages

    The ruling thus lent high judicial support to racial and ethnic discrimination and led to wider spread of the segregation between Whites and Blacks in the Southern United States. The great oppressive consequence from this was discrimination against African American minority from the socio-political opportunity to share the same facilities with the mainstream Whites, which in most of the cases the separate facilities for African Americans were inferior to those for Whites in actuality. The doctrine of “separate but equal” hence encourages two-tiered pluralism in U.S. as it privileged the non-Hispanic Whites over other racial and ethnic minority

    Read More

  • Racism In The 1920s Summary

    468 Words  | 2 Pages

    What is the purpose of racism? In Theorizing Nationalism, Day and Thompson discuss how racism and nationalism are precisely the same. Racism has the ability to help build nationalism, especially in our young country. LeMay and Barkan in U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Laws & Issues talk about how this racism is used during a specific time period, 1880 to 1920, in the United States of America. Both of these articles argue that when the United States was in a time of peril, they used racism as a unifying factor to bring the country together and as a way to put a group of people lower than themselves to bring their status to a higher point in society.

    Read More

More about Why Is Jim Crow Law Unfair

Open Document