Hannah Arendt Essays

Hannah Arendt is a 2013 bio-pic directed by Margarethe von Trotta; about an important episode form the life of German-Jewish philosopher Hannah Arendt (1906–1975) who was one of the most influential political theorists of the twentieth century. She was born in a German-Jewish family and was forced to leave Germany in 1933. Actress Barbara Sukowa plays the role of Arendt as a complicated woman, who is a brilliant philosopher and also stubborn at times. This film revolves around Hannah’s controversial

Research Proposal for Master of Philosophy in Humanities Thesis Title: Historical Dimension of Action: Political Experience in Hannah Arendt’s Thought Name of Applicant: Sigmund Tung-tin WONG Application No.: 61600000141 Research Interest: History of Political Thought This page is left blank intentionally. CONTENTS Chapter 1: Statement of Purpose 1 Chapter 2: Research Questions 3 Chapter 3: Provisional Structural Design and Outline

In an attempt to compare Karl Marx and Hannah Arendt’s critiques of the rights of man as expressed in “On the Jewish Question” and “The Decline of the Nation-State and the End of the Rights of Man,” in H. Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, considering their main arguments is inevitable. This article argues that both Karl Marx and Hannah Arendt’s critiques of the rights of man, for the most part, overlap and came from the same origin. The formulation of the question is of highly important for

philosopher Hannah Arendt, that is a common characteristic. In her book, The Human Condition the one idea that runs through the work is the supposed separation of the public realm and the private. Looking back at the Greek city-state, Arendt states that the freedom to act takes place in the public realm while the necessities of life take place in the private realm of family. Private affairs are never glorious, and this is why people on the inside are excluded from the public realm, where Arendt believed

Hannah Arendt's book "Eichmann in Jerusalem" is a fascinating and controversial text that explores Adolf Eichmann and his role in the Holocaust. Contrary to the conventional image of Eichmann as a ruthless and bloodthirsty monster, Arendt argues that Eichmann was simply a bureaucrat who followed orders without question. According to Arendt, Eichmann was not a psychopath, nor a serial killer, but simply a man who followed the orders he received from his superiors. While Arendt argues that Eichmann

Victoria Kussman Professor Daniel Howell FIRST UG-429—001 30 September 2017 Politically Ineffective: Hannah Arendt’s Opinion of the Public Sphere in Eichmann in Jerusalem, through the Lens of Jürgen Habermas’s The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article According to Jürgen Habermas’s The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article, the public sphere is a metaphorical space in which a large body of people can freely exchange ideas. Its purpose is to “[mediate] between society and state,” with many of the

I. Hannah Arendt life. A. The philosopher Hannah Arendt was born in 1906 in Germany with a Jewish family and died in 1975. B. Hannah Arendt life was a mixture of politics studying and historically. C. Hannah Arendt received her doctorate degree in philosophy in 1928. I. The origin of totalitarianism. A. Stalin 's regime had been giving the both instances of a novel form of government a name called totalitarianism. B. Hannah Arendt knows as political theorist from Germany like Some people think that

Hannah Arendt once said, “There are no dangerous thoughts; thinking itself is dangerous”. This quote really helps to grasp the harsh reality of the world Arendt went through because it captures the essence of the fierce criticism she faced. Arendt was a thinker, but her thinking was different which led her to become the face of huge controversy not only in the local community, but among her own people. Arendt’s major focus in her book Eichmann of Jerusalem revolves around a famous concept of hers

misread. Hannah Arendt’s ideas are difficult to grasp because she goes beyond the usual treatment of criminals accused of crimes against humanity, especially if they are former members of the Nazi party, and offers a completely different approach to the issue. Many people have claimed that the author expresses some very relevant philosophical points, but that the historical example she uses is simply not the right one for expressing these points. Most critics have shared the opinion that Arendt failed

Hannah Arendt believes that evil is irrational and can spread from one person to another very easily. Arendt believes that evil can only be extreme. Although evil can be very extreme such as owning slaves, it may only seem evil to those who oppose it. Evil actions are those to be considered inhumane by many peoples perspectives. Many events in history can be looked back upon as evil. One great example is slavery. Slavery has existed for thousands of years and up until about 150 years ago, it was

In this essay, I will show that Immanuel Kant is wrong to think that the only good without limitation is the good will. My first step in defending this thesis will be to review Kant’s argument about how the good will is intrinsically good. I will then try to undermine his view by showing it supports implausible claims. For example, the premise of Kant’s claim is that good will is unconditioned. However, the good will may depend on outside factors to bring about good in a person. Thus, I argue if

A Censored Soul Expressionism is classified as a movement of modernism. This art form initially started in poetry and later working into painting, starting in Germany and Eastern Europe in the 20th century. The basis of expressionism is to convey the world as it is seen through a personal perspective, usually being distorted in order to arouse ideas and emotions, it aimed to show the meaning of emotional encounters rather than reality itself. A Censored Soul (Figure 1) has a meaning that the opinions

Hannah Arendt, political theorist and philosopher, interprets revolutionary experience as a kind of restoration, whereby insurgent attempts are made to restore liberties and privileges that were lost as a result of the government’s temporary lapse into despotism. Taking a more empirical stance, Tocqueville, French political scientist and historian, defines revolution as an overthrow of the legally constituted elite, which then initiates a period of intense social, political, and economic change.

In order to clearly understand what Hannah Arendt wants to convey the interrelation between power and law, it is important to clarify what the separation of powers are. “Separation of powers” is regarded as a model to govern the state and it is the vital sphere of government. In addition, separation of powers can be referred as the main institutions of state which has functioned autonomously and no one or any institutions are able to have power over these institutions. According to the doctrine

Hannah Arendt’s work Eichmann in Jerusalem details the infamous trial of the Nazi bureaucrat Adolf Eichmann. Her work explores a number of different issues that pervaded Western Europe in the 20th century, but the notion of complicity is particularly elucidated. The complicity of Adolf Eichmann, or any German civil worker during the Nazi regime, is certainly a nebulous question. After a lengthy and frustrating trial, Eichmann is convicted of all fifteen counts of the indictment and sentenced to the

What is Situation Ethics? Situation Ethics was popularized by Joseph Fletcher around 1960s to 1970s. It claims that the morality of an act depends on the context rather than absolute moral standards. The situation is defined as “…the relative weight of the ends and means and motives and consequences all taken together, as weighed by love” In short, the absolute truth in Situation Ethics is “love”. Furthermore, if there is a right or wrong, it would be determined based on the desired result of the

Consequentialists are a group of philosophers who asses whether an act is right or wrong based on the consequences of the action. There are different types of consequentialism including: ethical egoism, act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism. These three branches of consequentialism will be discussed later in this paper. A supererogatory act is something that is good but is not obligatory; these acts involve rendering aid to others that go above moral requirement. Consequentialists claim that

Complexity Theory Complex theory is another kind that is closely related to chaos theory. A complex systems is one in which numerous independent elements continuously interact and spontaneously organize and reorganize themselves into more elaborate structures. Thus, complexity has the following characteristics: • A complex system has a large number of similar but independent elements or agents • In complex systems, there is persistent movement and responses by the elements • They exhibit adaptiveness

In The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood, there are many moments that establish Gilead, the fictional world the novel is set in, as a corrupt society. Gilead is incredibly segregationist, with minorities and women specifically being targeted. It has an incredible lack of reproductive rights for women, and sexual shaming and blame are very prevalent. Margaret Atwood herself stated that she based The Handmaid's Tale only on events that have happened in the past, so aspects of the novel will always

The novel, Handmaid’s Tale, was written by Margaret Atwood in 1985. The text is centered around Offred, a woman subsided into a role of inferiority and lead into a series of events surrounding the limitations of The Republic of Gilead. The Republic of Gilead, previously known as the United States, is totalitarian government concealed as a religious one as it uses forceful methods to control its people. These methods constructed the only acceptable social paradigm input, ones where Atwood wrote in