-Silence- "Well, answer me goddamn it!" "But, you're God. Why do you damn yourself? And the humans have turned Atheist you know. Nobody even knows who you are now." "Cut the crap. Operator, I'm tired of this shit." The eye of The Operator widens, "Do you mean you finally…" "You damn right… I'm gonna take a shit." The Operator sighed and sleeps. "Don't sleep! Who's gonna control Earth while I poo?" "Go fuck yourself you useless God!" The Operator shouts in frustration. "I'm sorry… Did I hear someone wanting to end their existence?" "No, I was dreaming." The operator says while skulki. "I guessed so… Fu fu fu….. NGGGGHHHHH…." God says proudly while using his ungodly powers to strain his anus. …show more content…
"Ask you what?" The Operator said while closing his eyes. "Ask me this, 'Have you finished taking a shit?'. Ask me that come on." "No." "Come on, it's a divine order. Fu fu fu. You can't disobey." God said while giggling. "Ugh, fine. Have you finished taking a shit?" The Operator said while rolling his eye. God bursts through the bathroom dimension and raised his thumb while saying, "Yes. It was one hell of a shitty moment." God laughs nonstop, all dimensions were rattled like a toy even The Operator were forced to block his hearings from the sound waves of God's laugh. "You are an ass." The Operator says to God
He then continues to quote the Bible and asks a rhetorical question that brings the whole situation in a new
When questioning God, after seeing a particularly awful hanging of a boy, he asks, “When You were displeased by Noah’s generation, You brought down the flood. When Sodom lost Your favor, You caused the heavens to rain down fire and damnation. But look at these men whom You have betrayed, allowing them to be tortured, slaughtered , gassed, and burned, what did they do? They pray they before You! They praise Your name”(68).
Liam: Hi, My name is Liam Northfield and I’m reporting for ABC News Australia. At about 11:11 on the 11th of the 11th, 2011, at 11 Christmas Place, Green Valley today i have met with a young man called steve, Steve here is in Jail for killing his whole family, so steve may i ask you a few questions? Kurtis:*Grunt* Liam: Why did you kill your family?
“Don’t touch me - don’t touch me! [...] You’re the Devil's man! [...] I’ll not hang with you! I love God, I love God. [...]
In the text, “Sinner in the Hands of an Angry God,” Jonathan Edwards uses many ways to keep his audience attentive; he emphasizes Gods control over everyday life, he includes examples and extraordinary descriptive terms, as well as including the audience in the act being described. To begin, Jonathan Edwards does a fantastic job at explaining how God has control over all things, to his audience. He captures the attention of the audience by coming right out and informing them that God's hands are on each and every thing. Also, he announced that when there is sin, the Lord isn’t happy, and with
I swore things won’t end well for that son of a…. Everything is crystal clear now, “God sees everything,” (8.102-105) I swear thing will not end well for this fool. I will get my doll’s revenge, even if it is the last thing I do before I die. Excuse me officer, but I have no further
The existence of God has been presented by a multitude of philosophers. However, this has led to profound criticism and arguments of God’s inexistence. The strongest argument in contradiction to God’s existence is the Problem of Evil, presented by J.L Mackie. In this paper, I aim to describe the problem of evil, analyse the objection of the Paradox of Omnipotence and provide rebuttals to this objection. Thus, highlighting my support for Mackie’s Problem of evil.
Edwards saw God’s power as something the world would not be capable of handling. Edwards used God’s power as a threat of destruction. Jonathan Edwards concluded his sermon by revealing his attitude of a merciful God through an allusion. “The wrath of Almighty God is now undoubtedly hanging over a great part of this congregation; let everyone fly out of Sodom. Haste and escape for your lives...escape to the
The use of God as a shield works on believers, but not on nonbelievers. The question “why bad things happening to good people” still cannot be answered for the nonbelievers, a common critique of religion itself. Regardless of the problem of theodicy, however, religion has worked really well to create and maintain the reality. Berger explains that it is because religion legitimates effectively. “Religion has been the historically most widespread and effective instrumentality of legitimation….
This was too rich. “God? Do you believe in God?” She wavered. Maybe she should keep her mouth shut.
When they walked up to the counter to checkout this was their experience, “’Is this counter open?’ Keiko asked. The clerk just looked around for another
The problem of evil takes into account three defining features of God: all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful and questions whether such a God would permit evil and not interfere. Sinnott-Armstrong discusses his stance by countering responses he coins as the Glorious Response, the Modest Response, and the Overriding Response. Whereas, Craig counters the arguments made by Sinnott-Armstrong. The Glorious Response Thus response suggests evil is
God forbid hard heads, philosophers, poets, orators, mad and scholars. " The idea that God has always been a great tool to calm the people in society and determine hope for a better life in all