ipl-logo

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By John Calhoun

697 Words3 Pages

In Calhoun’s speech, it’s quite apparent that these are the opinions the average white southerner. Before the reader has a chance to grasp the subject of the matter, Calhoun blatantly makes a threat by saying the coming years, the North will be “succeeded by those who will have been taught to hate the people and institutions of nearly one-half of this Union, with a hatred more deadly than one hostile nation ever entertained towards another.” He’s basically saying, “We’re not best buds, to begin with, but now you’re going to act like the boss and try to make us get rid of slavery. If you don’t get off our back about this, our hatred towards you is just going to grow until finally, we just conquer you.” John Calhoun also believed in separation …show more content…

He’s threatening to split up with the North because of its large correlation with the abolitionist movement. He wants to cease the relationship between the North and South and finally become two independent nations, where their opinion will thrive.
John Calhoun believes that there should never be a separation of the Southern religious society. He believes the root of the peace and happiness of the two races in the South is dependent on slavery. If the South relies on slavery to make them happy and peaceful, so be it. In slavery, the Africans are believed to be morally, intellectually, and physically improved, therefore, they are considered to be more civilized.
John Calhoun's goal at this time is to stay neutral within opinions. The whites in the north are equal to the ones in the South, therefore, we shall not favor one opinion over the other. All people of different color have to come together and build a positive relationship. With slavery, the South has continued to prosper and to be an influential part in the nation’s …show more content…

However there is one big difference between the tenants in Europe and the slaves in America. The slaves in America have better living standards than that of the poor Europeans. They have room for relationships between family, friends and even their masters or mistresses who can tend to their injuries and sickness. On the other hand, slaves in Europe have more restrictions that take these certain luxuries away from them.
What the North and South are basically two nations that are greatly different in terms of condition of society. The danger of conflict was among them at this time, almost concluding in a war. The North’s lack of order is causing the abolitionist movement to run rampant through both the North and the South, whereas the South’s laws and ideals on slavery are what makes the slave-owning states “more stable and quiet”.
All the of the society's around America, desire is to conclude with concert;To unite as one. This is the only, imminent solution to avoid battling against the opposing party, with an argument that can be easily avoided and resolved. In the end, we need to learn to, “Lay aside all party differences and unite with zeal and energy in repelling approaching

Show More
Related

  • Lincoln First Inaugural Address Analysis

    657 Words  | 3 Pages

    It would be more than difficult not to read Abraham Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address without some sense of pride or honor for one’s own country. He brings about a call to civility among all citizens striving for unity and harmony with one another. Lincoln understood the dilemma that slavery became for not only the Northerners attempting to abolish the practice entirely, but also for the Southerners perpetuating it in the first place. The fact that there was a faction rising in favor of slavery on a scale that would divide the country indefinitely and that Lincoln foresaw this danger demonstrates the level of prudence he was able to acquire up until his presidency. In this address, Lincoln stressed the importance of the nation staying unified and true to the principles set by

    Read More

  • Abraham Lincoln Rhetorical Analysis

    281 Words  | 2 Pages

    With all of the books written about President Lincoln, one might believe that there is nothing more to learn about this great man. However, Doris Kearns Goodwin wanted to show an unconventional analysis of Mr. Lincoln and how he used politics to his advantage. Three well educated men with similar backgrounds were compared alongside Abraham Lincoln who was considered to be much less educated and unqualified for the position. This trio of officials was astounded when Lincoln won the election. Over time and years of working together, the four of them had become friends and respected each other.

    Read More

  • How Did Calhoun Contribute To America's Rights

    1142 Words  | 5 Pages

    John Caldwell Calhoun was a politician from South Carolina. Calhoun was a candidate for the president in 1824, but he dropped out of the race and became the seventh United States Vice President from 1825-1832 under John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson. The significance of Calhoun was that he had a major role in the breaking up of the South and the North. Calhoun also was known for starting the Civil War. Calhoun is also remembered for defending slavery, he was one of the leading voices to secure the institution of slavery.

    Read More

  • Who Was John Brown Insane For The Harpers Ferry Raid?

    474 Words  | 2 Pages

    John Brown was an abolitionist who was a part of the anti-slavery movement. He led the Harpers Ferry Raid in hopes to ignite a spark in slave uprisings. Brown was not insane for his plans of raiding and supplying slaves with guns from the arsenal. The plan for the raid was not a spontaneous attack.

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By Senator George Washington

    547 Words  | 3 Pages

    On March 4, 1858, Senator James Henry Hammond from South Carolina, delivered a compelling speech. He encompassed a variety of thoughts into his speech to reflect how slavery existed in the South which benefitted countries in Europe. As a matter of fact, he wanted to present the speech to the Senate to show how much work the slaves did to provide the world’s top leading crop, cotton. Senator Hammond explains how the land to grow cotton is enough and no one ought to raise a war about it. The rhetorical strategies he uses within his speech are personification, syntax, and diction to make his statement equitable.

    Read More

  • Does Webster Seem To Agree With Slavery

    659 Words  | 3 Pages

    Webster mentions John C. Calhoun’s statement regarding the divisions between the members of the Methodist Episcopal church regarding slavery. Why does he do this? What message is he attempting to portray? Webster mentions the separation of the Methodist Episcopal church as a metaphor for South Carolina’s threat to separate from the union.

    Read More

  • John C Calhoun Character Traits

    1419 Words  | 6 Pages

    John C. Calhoun John C. Calhoun (1782-1850), was a prominent U.S. statesman and spokesman for the slave-plantation system of the antebellum South. As a young congressman from South Carolina, he helped steer the United States into war with Great Britain and established the Second Bank of the United States. Calhoun went on to serve as U.S. secretary of war, vice president and briefly as secretary of state. As a longtime South Carolina senator, he opposed the Mexican-American War and the admission of California as a free state, and was renowned as a leading voice for those seeking to secure the institution of slavery. A nationalist at the outset of his political career, Calhoun was one of the leading War Hawks who maneuvered the unprepared United States into war with Great Britain in 1812.

    Read More

  • Dbq On Abraham Lincoln

    862 Words  | 4 Pages

    B3 DBQ In the month of March 1861, Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated as the 16th president of the United States. The north and the south both had different reactions to his presidency. The south felt that Lincoln was a threat to their need of slaves. So when the south heard of Lincoln’s victory 11 states seceded from the United States and became known as the confederacy.

    Read More

  • Lincoln Racist Dbq

    867 Words  | 4 Pages

    Lincoln talks about the union in Document G and said the following: “But you say that sooner than yield your legal right to the slave—especially at the bidding of those who are not themselves interested, you would see the Union dissolved.” If the South successfully separated from the North the Confederacy would no longer be under the control of the Union and Lincoln’s access to freeing the slaves would minimal. This “new nation” that Lincoln was trying to create and put into effect had a strong foundation based upon Constitutional rights which declare that all men are created equal. Yes, maybe Lincoln at this point wanted to keep the Union together, which can most definitely be perceived as racist too but slavery on the back burner for the time being, but in the end, he encouraged and defended the rights of all humans.

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq

    1266 Words  | 6 Pages

    At certain times throughout the Civil War and times leading up to it, the Union posed a bigger threat towards slavery than other times. In Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address, he stated that he supported the fugitive slave law and he “[had] no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. [He believed he had] no lawful right to do so, and [had] no inclination to do so” (Abraham Lincoln’s First Inaugural Address, page 1). This was when the South’s fears that the Union planned on abolishing slavery were at an all time

    Read More

  • Civil War Dbq Essay

    834 Words  | 4 Pages

    Though the reason for the South secession was claimed not to be about slavery, but rather “states rights”, it was ultimately over the right to keep African Americans enslaved. For the North, though there was an abolitionist's motive, Lincoln initially fought just to keep the United States together. When Union Major General Butler came across many slaves who came to Fort Monroe for refuge from rebel states owners, he asked questions regarding their stance (Document A). He raised the unavoidable question, “is their condition that of men, women, and children, or of property, or is it a mixed relation?”, and didn’t fail to note how they were “able bodied” for the war, though initially during the beginnings of the Civil War people were hesitant to let African Americans participate. However, after a long delay even Lincoln supported Africans fighting for the Union in the Civil War, as noted in a letter where he refutes critics against the fact (Document C).

    Read More

  • Why White Southerners Want To Secede Essay

    704 Words  | 3 Pages

    The southern whites feared the “the fate of the white race under Republican rule.” Many southern white men noted that Abraham Lincoln clearly wanted to end the southern way of life by forcing racial equality. “The North has variably exerted against slavery, all the power which it had at the time.” Many southern states saw the plans of the party as an abuse of federal government power, and feared what that could mean for the future.

    Read More

  • The Primary Source: Vice President John C. Calhoun

    474 Words  | 2 Pages

    The historical context for the primary source, “Vice President John C. Calhoun Argues That Tariffs Disadvantage the South, 1828," is Vice President John C. Calhoun's speech in 1828, where he argues against the tariff system and its negative impact on the Southern states. The speech was likely delivered in a political setting, such as a congressional session or a public gathering, where Calhoun expressed his views on the tariff policy. Vice President John C. Calhoun criticizes tariffs, saying they hurt the South's agricultural economy while benefiting the North's manufacturing industries. He argues that this system favors some regions over others, “So partial are the effects of the system, that its burdens are exclusively on one side, and the

    Read More

  • Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address Rhetorical Analysis

    642 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lincoln urges the people to “strive on to finish the work we are in,” “to bind up the nation's wounds,” he is trying to get the United Sate Citizens to become one again to unite and be one strong country, showing that even after a huge war that the country can remain strong and unified and that this war will allow for a strong brotherhood in the US. Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address is significant because Lincoln offered and objective point of view. Lincoln did not speak of the unloyalty of the South nor did he praise the North. Rather, Lincoln used multiple points to show that the Unification should be the main focus of his speech not that the states should be divided because of

    Read More

  • Why Did The American Civil War Was Inevitable?

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    Two fundamental questions normally surround the history of any war: whether the war was inevitable and if it was necessary. These same questions emerge any time during debates regarding the American Civil war. The most cited cause of the Civil war is the secession of certain southern states that formed the Confederate States of America in January 1861. Thomas Bonner writes "Civil War Historians and the "Needless War" Doctrine" arguing that Southern Carolina seceded in 1860, followed by six other states by January the following year. A deep analysis of the events leading to the war indicates that the Union and the Confederates had profound ideological, economic, political, and social differences.

    Read More

More about A Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By John Calhoun

Open Document