ipl-logo

Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice

1588 Words7 Pages

Plea bargaining

Name
Institutional affiliation

Trial by a jury was intended as a truth seeking mechanism, a means of achieving fairness and a way to hold the government to the principles of the constitution. The Sixth Amendment of the constitution guarantees the right to a fair trial by an impartial jury. It gives the defendant a right to challenge evidence presented by the government and provides for a conviction only if an impartial jury finds the defendant guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Despite the right to a fair trial, the criminal justice system is largely a system of plea-bargaining with the outcome being decided by the prosecutor (Bibas, 2004). This paper will look at the use of plea bargaining in the criminal justice …show more content…

Innocent defendants who are risk averse cannot be willing to risk going to trial and receiving harsh sentences and instead choose to plead guilty to ensure the receive lenient sentences. It undermines the integrity of the justice system as it allows the government to evade the rigorous standards required by the due process. It allows the prosecutor to take the role of a judge and jury in determining the guilt of the defendant. It also allows the defendant to escape the full punishment for their misconduct by giving them lenient sentences. Lenient sentences offered to those who plea bargain in contrast to harsher sentences for those who are convicted after a full trial lead to disparities in individuals convicted of similar offences.
An alternative to the plea bargaining process is a bench trial. The system that allows the defendant to waive his right to a jury trial and instead receive a bench trial, which is a less restrictive alternative to a jury trial. However, unlike a plea bargain, the defendant still preserves his constitutional rights. This system conforms more closely to the due process than plea bargaining because it allows the defendant an opportunity to be heard. They require less time and resources compared to jury trials (Stuntz, …show more content…

It is a compromise to the right to a jury trial and provides advantages for the prosecutor as well as the defendant. It saves time and resources that would be required in a jury trial and reduces the risk of uncertain sentences on trial. Arguments against its use provide that it is unconstitutional because it deprives the defendant the right to the due process of the law. However, the use of plea-bargains has become an important part of the criminal justice system as it allows for the prompt disposition of

Show More
Related

  • Annotated Bibliography Deal Frees West Memphis Three

    550 Words  | 3 Pages

    The author looks at the time period that the three were released and discusses the reason for their release, which is Alford plea. In this case, the defendant is voluntarily forced to plead guilty while still proclaiming his or her innocence. The author also looks at the evidence and ends up concluding that that there was little evidence that linked the defendants to the murder. In addition, the author criticizes the state’s government for forcing the men to plead guilty. Using another case, the author looks into this matter by examining the flaws related to the Alford’s plea.

    Read More

  • Texas Judicial Branch Case Study

    856 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, a defendant might accept a plea bargain from the prosecution before trial, because the evidence against them is overwhelming. If that is not the case, the prosecution will have to prove their case to a jury beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a crime, and the defendant should have to serve jail or prison time for their punishment as a result of their crime. In conclusion, many people believe the Texas Judicial Branch needs refurbishing for the 21st century.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    1423 Words  | 6 Pages

    It is really impossible to predict what a jury is going to decide in a trial. Plea bargaining is used for prevalent reasons that may include that defendants can avoid the time and the cost of defenfing themselves at trial which can bring the risk of a tougher

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    652 Words  | 3 Pages

    Both sides will carefully weigh the strength of their case and decide whether it is prudent to go to trial. The prosecution may also consider the publicity surrounding the case and whether there is public pressure to prosecute that particular defendant to the full extent of the law. The defense will consider the individual defendant’s desire to go to trial and the seriousness of the potential sentence. The Pros of Plea Bargaining

    Read More

  • Alford Court Case Analysis

    1183 Words  | 5 Pages

    The most common agreement and concession between the two parties is often for the defendant to plead guilty to a particular charge (or charges) in return for a less serious charge (or charges), a dismissal of other charges, or even a lesser sentence. As an example, the defendant in a felony theft charge might have the chance to plead guilty to a misdemeanor theft charge. This lessens the workload on the court, it still gives the prosecution a conviction, and it gives the defendant a lesser sentence.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    1648 Words  | 7 Pages

    Plea bargaining is the process by which the prosecution and defense reach an agreement resulting in a guilty plea from the defendant that results in a reduced charge, reduced sentence, or some other concession favorable to the defendant is the definition from chapter twelve “Plea Bargaining and Guilty Pleas” of the book Courts of Criminal Justice in America (Siegel). In criminal cases, this is an agreement to avoid the trial to be long; instead of taking the lawsuit to a jury, the prosecutor and the defendant work together to find something in which they can agree. It usually includes pleading for a smaller charge and pleading guilty in return for a lesser sentence. Most cases in the United States are settled through plea bargain rather than

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    Those who support plea bargaining say the greatest benefit of plea bargaining "is the savings in time and expense to the parties, the court, and the public" (Plea Bargaining). Another benefit claimed by those who are in favor of plea bargaining is "that docket pressures are too great and that prosecutors lack the time to pursue all indictments because there are simply too many" (Dever). Plea bargains aren’t perfect, though. In addition to these advantages, there are exploitations in the process that usually harm the defendant. The opponents of plea bargaining state that "the process may result in waivers by defendants of their constitutional rights, unequal representation by counsel, the threat of unequal sentencing, and the possibility that guilty pleas will be entered by innocent defendants" (Plea Bargaining).

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    591 Words  | 3 Pages

    Plea bargaining, synonym to the plea agreement as a number would call it, is an agreement in a criminal case between a prosecutor and a defendant in a case, whereby the defendant complies to plead guilty to a specific charge and in return the prosecutor agrees to give the defendant some privilege. The defendant could plead guilty to a less serious charge or just to one of the many charges in exchange of dismissal for other charges. There are different types of bargaining such as plea, count, charge, and sentence bargaining. However, there is a contrast between charge bargaining and sentence bargaining. In charge bargaining, the defendant pleads guilty to a less serious case than the initial charge while in sentence bargaining, the defendant agrees to plead guilty acknowledging in advance what verdict will be given.

    Read More

  • The Speedy Trial Act (1974)

    647 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Sixth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution, the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 and the states’ constitutional or statutory provisions establish the right to a speedy trial of criminal defendants. In particular, the 6th Amendment’s Clause states that “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial” (Susskind, 1993).While the U. S. Constitution does not provide a precise frame of time, states’ laws specify the time within which prosecution must try a defendant. However, the computations are so complex that cases are rarely dismissed on the ground of violation of the speedy trial right (Shestokas, 2014). In fact, ironically defendants have to demand a speedy trial for these time periods to run and their

    Read More

  • Plea Bargains In Criminal Law

    311 Words  | 2 Pages

    A “Plea bargain” is an agreement between the prosecutor, the defendant’s attorney and the defendant. In return for the defendant entering a plea of guilty to a criminal charge, the prosecutor agrees to recommend to the judge a particular penalty. Plea bargaining allows the prosecutor to obtain guilty pleas in cases that might otherwise go to trial. The prosecution is relieved of the burden of proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt at trial and the defendant receives a specific resolution of the charges against him.

    Read More

  • Plea Bargaining In The Court System

    101 Words  | 1 Pages

    Plea bargaining should be allowed in the court system. This is because the plea bargains are quick which saves time in court. It also saves the expenses of the state. It is easier to just admit to the case to receive the lesser sentence. There also might be some added information that could lead to locating missing people, remains of a victim or kidnapping victims.

    Read More

  • Why Is Plea Bargaining Unfair

    1485 Words  | 6 Pages

    Plea bargains are growing to resolve many cases. (Shetokas, 2014) According to the legal dictionary the sixth amendment to the U.S. Constitution affords criminal defendants seven discrete personal liberties: (1) the right to a Speedy Trial; (2) a public trial is allowed (3) have the right to have a fair jury; (4) knowledge of charges that are pending; (5) being able to cross-examine and confront the eyewitness; (6) the right to compel favorable witnesses to testify at trial through the subpoena power of the judiciary; and (7) legal rights to have an attorney. ( legaldictionary). With the fourteen

    Read More

  • John Pfaff Lock In Sparknotes

    1080 Words  | 5 Pages

    Prosecutors have the power to send offenders away which allows them to make harsh decisions. They offer plea bargains to offenders which often will enable them to do time in prison. Pfaff stated that "as long as prosecutors simply use the tough laws as a bargaining chip, not real punishment, legislators can reap the political benefits of looking tough on crime while avoiding difficult financial decisions" (Pfaff, 2017, P136). Prosecutors offer a plea bargain to get rid of cases quickly and not allow offenders to go to trial because they might receive more prison

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Wrongful Conviction

    949 Words  | 4 Pages

    People plead guilty for crimes that are not committed by them to avoid trial, but by doing so the right decision wasn’t made.

    Read More

  • Trial By Jury Advantages And Disadvantages

    1472 Words  | 6 Pages

    In this paragraph, the advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury will be discussed. The main advantages are that juries introduce community values into the legal process and can influence the system (Joyce, 2013); they can achieve a sense of equity and fairness without enforcing unjust laws; in addition, juries are independent and neutral (Davies, 2015). Moreover, they guarantee participation from the public in a democratic institution (Hostettler, 2004), and represent the population thanks to the randomness with which jurors are decided (Davies, 2015). On the other hand, the most important disadvantages are that jurors have no prior contact with the courts, no training (Hostettler, 2004) and therefore they lack knowledge of law, courtroom proceedings (Joyce, 2013), and lack of ability to understand the legal directions (Thomas, 2010). Moreover, they must face evidence which is highly technical (Hostettler, 2004).

    Read More

More about Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice

Open Document