Would you disregard the lives of thousands of people for wealth and power? That is what Andrew Jackson did when he endorsed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This act resulted in the forced migration of several tribes from the southeastern region of the United States. Jackson believed that this was the best way to protect the indians from being scattered and destroyed. He claimed that gaining more land for the white settlers would increase economic progress. This, of course, was just a tactic he used to make the concept seem like a peaceful and beneficial idea for America. The Indian Removal Act was actually a terrible thing for the natives. The Trail Of Tears was the migration of 15,000 Cherokee natives from Georgia to Oklahoma. Along the …show more content…
Confirming the Indian Removal Act was a step in the wrong direction because it was unconstitutional, formed even worse relationships with the natives than we already had, and it made Andrew Jackson seem to be a terrible president.
The ratification of the Indian Removal Act was unconstitutional on Andrew Jacksonś part. The Cherokee had managed to bring their case to the Supreme Court (Worcester v. Georgia) and the Supreme Court was in their favor. Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Cherokee had an ¨unquestionable right to their lands¨. Andrew Jackson ignored this and continued to pass the Indian Removal Act, disregarding the system of Checks and Balances. Some people may argue that the natives aren’t civilized enough to have that much land, so it made more sense for America to take over that land to make use of it, rather than to be politically correct. In their defense, the Americans weren’t any bit of civilized when they first began to arrive and take over all of the preoccupied land. They aren’t uncivilized, they just aren’t white and that seems to be a problem for people. That …show more content…
Many historians argue that the Cherokee leaders didn’t prepare well enough for the journey, taking into account all of the time the Americans gave them. Saying the Cherokees are to blame for their own deaths during the Trail Of Tears is like blaming the Jews for having to deal with unsanitary conditions in Boxcars during the Holocaust; it doesn’t make sense. “The Cherokee people called this journey the ‘Trail of Tears’ because of its devastating effects. The migrants faced hunger, disease, and exhaustion on the forced march. Over 4.000 of 15,000 of the cherokees died.” (PBS) This terrible treatment towards the natives led to the future hatred of Americans, and just added onto reasons why the white people should not be trusted. “...the sufferings of the Cherokee were awful. The trail of exiles was a trail of death. They had to sleep in the wagons and on the ground without fire. And I have known as many as twenty-two of them to die in one night of pneumonia due to ill treatment, cold, and exposure.” (Document A). Twenty-two people dying in one night is ridiculous, especially since it could’ve been avoided if the Americans had been willing to bring ample supplies for the thousands of natives they hauled along with them. Andrew Jackson was behind all of this, and claimed to be a voice for the people. If
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Whether Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policies were ethical has come of debate from the time they were enacted and before. The time that Jackson was president has been fittingly named the Jacksonian Era. One of the iconic images of this era is a political cartoon that depicts President Jackson as “King Jackson the First” as he steps on the constitution and the Albany Plan of Union. I think that Jackson’s actions were not ethical.
His views regarding the Indians were distorted by his absolute loathe towards them, creating a toxic environment for the Natives. Due to the constant requests and suggestions to relocate the Indians west of the Mississippi River, a dry place seemingly uninhabitable for farm life, Andrew passed the “Indian Removal Act” which remunerated the “Five Civilized Tribes,” the Creek, Chickasaw, Seminole, Cherokee, and Choctaw to abandon their lands and move west of the Mississippi. Although this may sound fair, paying the tribes to migrate someplace else, the lands that they were given was much too unsuitable for the sustainability of crops and the conditions they had to endure during their journey west were absolutely sickening. Some tribes accepted the policy, whereas the Cherokee was defiant against the unethical policies, stating that the policy did not apply to them as they were a separate and independent nation with their own individual laws. Jackson, being the tyrant he is, ignores the Cherokees’ statements and continues to enforce the policy, even though the Supreme Court had already settled on a final ruling.
Andrew Jackson and Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. The Indian Removal authorized the relocation of Native Americans from the lands East of the Mississippi River and to the west. The plan was finished by moving the Native Americans to what is now Oklahoma. The Indian Removal Act was meant to support the expansion of the United States without interference by moving the Natives out of the way. The Indian removal act was rationalized by the self-serving concept of manifest destiny, the belief that the expansion of the United States from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean was divinely ordained and inevitable, was used to justify the eviction of Native Americans from their native homelands.
The Indian Removal Act helped United States expansion, and supported the unification of the nation. This opportunity for the Natives to expand their territory and prosper as a people, was beneficial for them, as well as for Americans past, present and future. We’d had past treaties with the Natives, but because of infractions on both sides, none of those were beneficial for too long. In May of 1830, the act was passed, to serve as a more permanent solution to the ongoing wars. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the right direction for the United States, as it created space for American’s to settle on, grow up with, and prosper on.
[...] However, [it] forced Native Americans to vacate lands they had lived on for generations”(Doc 5 Par 3). This fact even further supports the idea that Andrew Jackson was not a man of morals even for his time. Although Jackson’s intentions were “good” in terms of manifest destiny, The Indian Removal
In fact the common man of the time—whether he was a powerful blueblood or a humble Christian—didn’t believe that the Native Americans should be able to keep their land for quite a few reasons. They felt that Native Americans were prohibiting the United States from truly expanding to its fullest potential not to mention they also felt threatened by the Natives being so close. So, Jackson signed into law the Indian Removal Act in 1830. However, there were American Indians that refused to leave their home lands for the lands promised to them further west in what would now be Oklahoma. Eventually they were forcibly removed by American troops.
Would you remove an abundance of Indians from their homes for money? That is what the Indian Removal Act did. Hundreds of Native Americans were taken from their homes. Andrew Jackson and John Ross had a debate on if they should get rid of the Indian Removal Act or if they should keep it. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the right direction.
could try to push his agenda to get the Native American out of the East but there was some opposition. The first one was a report from the Committee of Indian Affairs that stated, “They [Cherokees] have called upon the Executive [Andrew Jackson] to make good this guarantee, by preventing this operation in Georgia and Alabama.” What the Cherokee wanted was President Andrew Jackson to honor past treaties in order for them to stay in those respective states. After many debates and arguments in the House of Representatives, the House, passed the act. The Senate passed it and after many debates the House passed the Indian Removal Act With the most controversial law being passed in Congress and the president signing it , there will was a period
The Trail of Tears was a massive transport of thousands of Native Americans across America. After the Indian removal act was issued in 1830 by president Andrew Jackson, the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee, and Seminole tribes were taken from their homelands and transported through territories in what many have called a death march. The government, on behalf of the new settlers ' cotton picking businesses, forced the travel of one hundred thousand Native Americans across the Mississippi River to a specially designated Indian territory for only the fear and close-mindedness of their people. The Native Americans were discriminated against by not only their new government, but also the people of their country and forced to undertake one of the most difficult journeys of their lives.
Andrew Jackson was the 7th president of the United States of America serving between the years, 1829-1839, or a total of two presidential terms. Jackson was born in March 15th, of 1767 in Waxhaws, which is a city in the northern area of South Carolina. He had been attending elementary schools in the area, but the revolutionary war ended his childhood. Much of his family was wiped out during the war. At the age of 15, the young war torn Andrew Jackson drifted off and taught a bit of school, but then he started to study law.
After the U.S Constitution was ratified on the 27 of June 1788, American governors swore oath to democracy, equality and liberty. The idea of democracy has constantly been ignored throughout American history. At the very beginning of the new nation, the presidents were not elected by the people but rather by legislatures, distancing itself from the ideal method of democracy where the power belonged to the people. It was only gradually throughout the presidential elections that each state’s people started voting directly. Andrew Jackson is one of the American presidents whose actions are still debated on today.
On the other hand, for people who have Indian heritage, might consider this a horrible act passed by President Jackson. It could be vice versa as well. In reality, though, Jackson really did want what was best for his country, even if that included getting rid of Indians to another region. I believe that he wanted the best for the tribes too and that he wanted all of them to be together, just not in this particular land. Overall, I think that Andrew Jackson had very good intentions, they just might have come off as discourteous or inconsiderate to
There is a saying in Africa, “Don’t make decisions about us, without us!” Andrew Jackson did not talk to the Indians before he made a bad decision which cost the lives of 4,000 Indians and dislocated 46,000 others. At the same time, the settlers weren’t happy with the Indian Removal Act process, it was too slow for them. “The policy was enacted with remarkable speed, but not fast enough to satisfy whites in the South and Southwest.” (p.331) Jackson's Democracy was always cast for the benefit of white men, it didn't even include white
The trail of Tears was an unethical decision implemented by the government of the United State. The President Jackson used force to push the native American out of their lands. According to www.ushistory.gov, << Over 20,000 Cherokees were forced to march westward along the Trail of Tears. About a quarter of them died along the way>>.
One of the dreadful things that happened in U.S. history was because of Andrew Jackson. It is none other than the Trail of Tears. The Supreme Court didn’t want it to happen but Jackson defied them and did it anyway. He forced 20,000 Native Americans out of their homelands at gunpoint even though they were living in for years. Everyone was forced out, the sick, the old and the young.