In her speech addressing the National American Woman Suffrage Association on the topic of child labor, Florence Kelley bases her argument, through the use of logos, cacophony, and rhetorical questions on the ethical merit against child labor. Establishing her main arguments, and introducing the topic at hand, Kelley provides statistical evidence by which she conveys the pandemic of child labor. By stating that, “We have, in this country, two million children who are earning their bread,” she establishes the idea that child labor is widespread throughout the union and further notes the idea by describing the alarming trend of low wage-earning children growing as a demographic. She also notes it is especially common for girls between the ages
Child Labor Analysis Child Labor was one of Florence Kelley’s main topics at a speech she gave in Philadelphia during a convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association. Kelley talks about all the horrors children were going through and the injustices they were suffering. She talks of the conditions children working in, the hours they were going in, and all in all, how wrong child labor was. Her purpose for this was to gain support of people to petition for the end of child labor. Kelley’s appeals to Ethos, Pathos and Logos through the use of great rhetoric is what allows her to achieve her purpose.
Killing two birds with one stone is exactly what Florence Kelley does in her speech at the National American Woman Suffrage Association convention on July 22, 1905. She argues against unfair child labor laws by utilizing emotional appeal, using rhetorical questions, and employing repetition. Kelley does this in order to convince her audience if women had the right to vote there would be better child labor laws. Kelley’s utilization of emotional appeal invokes a number of different emotions onto the audience. For example, Kelley states “Tonight while we sleep, several thousand little girls will be working in textile mills, all the night through, in the deafening noise of the spindles and the looms spinning and weaving cotton and wool, silks and ribbons for us to
The question touches on the subject of women’s rights to vote. In asking this question, Kelley makes her audience consider whether child labor would still be acceptable if women had the right to vote. She is trying to show her audience that if women were allowed to vote, they would not want their children working ¨under twelve years of age,¨ and would try and ¨stop the work¨ of children all together . In asking this question, Kelley connects herself with her audience and makes them consider the effect on the lack of women’s rights, and how the lack of rights is hurting children. Using a rhetorical question helps Kelley briefly reveal the need for an increase in women’s rights, while helping her argument on child labor.
In the early 1800’s women were expected to confine themselves to the sphere of domestic concerns. They were unable to obtain a real education or pursue a professional career, could not own property after marriage, and were denied the right to vote. Although initially excluded from the abolitionist movement, William Lloyd Garrison’s abolitionist newspaper The Liberator was one of the first to welcome women into the movement. “Garrison encouraged women to join with their congregations in pouring out ‘supplication[s] to heaven on behalf of the slaves’ ” (Jeffrey, p 18). By the 1830’s, thousands of women were involved in the cause to abolish slavery.
Is it oppression that drives others onwards and upwards, or is it pure anger that fuels their desire to strive for change. (reason 1 oppression) If you look at Sojourner Truth’s (a ohia women that lived in 1851) speech “Ain’t I a woman” it gives a insight on how oppression can motivate people to change. (reason ½) If you look in Sojourner Truth’s speech, you can find in paragraph 2, signs of oppression and its willingness for change, grow. “Women need to be helped into carriages and lifted over ditches….. Nobody ever helps me into carriages and lifted over ditches, or gives me any best place. Aint I a women.”
Thousands of women have screamed at the top of their lungs, clawed at the patriarchy, and tirelessly fought for their rights as citizens of the United States of America. From the beginning of mankind, women have been labeled as inferior to men not only physically, but mentally and intellectually as well. Only in 1920 did women gain the right to voice their opinions in government elections with a vote, while wealthy white men received the expected right since the creation of the United States. A pioneer in women’s suffrage, Susan B. Anthony publicly spoke out against this hypocrisy in a time when women were only seen as child bearers and household keepers. Using the United State’s very own Constitution and Declaration as ammunition, Anthony wrote countless speeches and called for the right to vote in a country that boasted equality and freedom for all, yet women were not included.
As of today, Helen Keller is remembered for being a political and social activist who use her talents to speak against women’s suffrage, U. S’s involvement in World War and most importantly help the American Foundation for the Blind. III. Helen Keller was a woman who worried endlessly to achieve everything she has accomplished. Body I. Helen Keller’s Early Years A. Ms. Keller was born in Tuscumbia, Alabama on June 27, 1880. When she was born she was an average healthy baby until she reached 19 months where she grew extremely ill from
In Florence Kelley's speech, she reveals her distraught views about child labor. Kelley argues the cruelty of “little white girls” being forced to work at unreasonable hours of the night while the common adult is at home receiving a good night's rest. Kelley underscores her ideas with exemplification, comparisons, and repetition. She begins her address by stating factual evidence: “We have, in this country, two million children under the age of sixteen years who are earning their bread.” This powerful opening statement grabs the audience’s attention and highlights the labor induced community in which the children are suffering from. The audience now have some insight of her alarming topic.
In her speech, Florence Kelley uses different rhetorical strategies to convey her message about child labor to the audience. Kelley uses repetition, pathos, and logos. She wants to get her message across to the audience that child labor needs to be stopped. First, Kelley uses repetition to emphasize her message about child labor. Throughout the speech she repeats one particular phrase, “while we sleep.” “And while we sleep, little white girls will be working tonight in the mills in those states.” “ And they will do so tonight, while we sleep.” “ Tonight while we sleep, several thousand little girls will be working in the textile mills.” Kelley’s repetition of this makes the audience feel some type of emotion.
In her speech to the National American Woman Suffrage Association, Florence Kelly descriptively vocalizes about chid labor. She talks about the horrible conditions young children face in the states. Kelly uses repetition to put emphasis on little girls working in textile mills, “while we sleep” is repeated 3 times this makes the audience feel guilty for enjoying life while little girls are working. Kelly also uses pathos, appealing to the emotion of her
She portrays the distressed women arriving at “she thought was a comprehensive health care provider near her home in Columbus, Ohio”. When arriving the doctors told her not to abort her baby, causing her to land in a crisis pregnancy center. These non-profit organizations work to “obstruct women’s access to abortion”. Meaghan Winter utilizes this anecdote to shed light on a disheartening situation, opening the reader’s eyes to what is truly happening to women across the globe. She employ pathological appeal by emphasizing the corner many women are metaphorically jammed in,” when providers like Planned Parenthood are shut down” and how “they leave low-income women with few alternatives for reproductive and preventive health care”.
Inc, 2015) The key event and actions that Muriel Matters was involved in was tirelessly campaigning for women’s voting rights in the English counties for many years. However, she was mostly known for chaining herself to the grille in 1908. “As this was a symbol of oppression of women in a male dominate society, and was her firm conviction was that the grille should be removed.” (Muriel Matters Society. Inc, 2015) As Muriel Matters describes it as a “vile grille and its removal as a symbol of the breaking down of one of the barriers that are between us and liberty” (Suffragette Postcards, 2015) In the course of the protest Muriel delivered a speech to parliament for the right of women to vote and for the removal of the grille. “Her speech was hailed as the first delivered by a woman in the House of Commons.” (ABC, Australian Art, 2013) She was sent to prison for a moth for inappropriate behaviour.
“It is unthinkable that a national government which represents women should ignore the issue of the right of all women to political freedom.” The movement of Lucy Burns mainly took place in the 20th century between 1913 and 1920. Many of her rallies and protest took place in front of the White House but some in other countries like Europe where she met Alice Paul in London in a police station. Lucy Burns took a stand towards her belief in women equality and she stood firm on her belief even after getting arrested 6 times, having her banners wording her beliefs torn, and the government only approving the suffrage amendment due to hunger strikes held by those who were caught and jailed, which was many. Gender equality for women was what pushed