Andrew Jackson and the Search for Vindication, a biography written by James C. Curtis and published in 1976, explores Andrew Jackson’s life from his childhood experiences to his presidency. James C. Curtis analyzes Andrew Jackson’s actions psychologically during his life-long search for vindication. James C. Curtis allows the reader to better understand why Jackson was such a troubled person, in both his childhood and adult years. Growing up, Jackson was a “hellion” (James C. Curtis 7). Jackson’s family experienced many tragedies. Starting with the Jackson’s family decision to migrate from Ireland to America where they “found themselves in a society nearly as disrupted as the one they had abandoned” to the deaths of Andrew Jackson senior, …show more content…
Jackson “tried to disown his troubled childhood, replacing it with aspirations for an orderly life” (22). Anyone who threatened view would have to face Jackson. He always made sure to prove himself not only to himself, but others as well. During the Peggy Eaton affair, Jackson defended Mr. Eaton and his wife from gossips. Mrs. Eaton was charged with adultery after her first husband had committed suicide. Mr. Eaton married Mrs. Eaton to give her a worthy name and in hopes that the rumors die down. Other political families did not agree that Mrs. Eaton was good women. They “unwelcomed [her] at all social functions” (100). This reminded Jackson of his own problems with his deceased wife, Rachel Jackson. She, too, had rumors circulating from her first marriage and it haunted her all the way to her death. Because of the similar circumstance for the Eaton’s, Jackson defended them and even lost some relationships with people who did not agree with him. Jackson had major trust issues towards everyone. “Distrustful of politics and politicians,” (180) Andrew Jackson always followed his ideas. It is questionable whether Jackson’s actions were for protection of the people and state’s rights or mostly for his own interests. He is known as the president for the people. “ To the South, he was a slaveholder; to the Scotch Irish of Pennsylvania he was kin; to the frontiersmen of …show more content…
I would recommend this book to more advanced readers. Jackson was involved in many relationships with many people of different views. Although he tried to surround himself with his own supporters, sometimes the opponent seemed more reliable than his own people. These various relationships make the book a bit difficult to read because there is just a lot of information over his personal life, political life, and how personal affected political views. The book is in chronological order and uses reliable resources. The book is thorough and explains many of the relationships and scandals Jackson was a part of. The book remains constant in its theme of analyzing Jackson’s life in a psychological viewpoint to support that his character was influence by his experiences. The book is best explained to be a textbook. It has an overall subject about Andrew Jackson’s life. Then each chapter explains furthermore details about what happens in his
Andrew Jackson transformed from the man on the twenty dollar bill to a great commander and leader, and I learned how important this battle really was to modern America. I liked how fast paced the book managed to be, while still fully explaining the details of the war. A lot of nonfiction books tend to lose me with all of the different names and dates, but I feel that I was able to keep up with this one fairly well. I wanted to praise this book for showing that America was not a perfect place at this time, as it feels like a like of people actually believe that. For example, the depiction of the slave who had a “collar of spikes around his neck” put on him for trying to escape by an American was necessary for this purpose (88).
Vice President John Calhoun’s wife led the other wives in snubbing the Eatons at social gatherings. The wives thought of Peggy as too flirtatious and too outlandish mostly because she didn’t wait the expected amount of time until remarriage. Because Andrew Jackson’s wife, Rachel Jackson, wasn’t legally divorced to her former husband before remarrying to Jackson, he was furious when Peggy was treated the same and demanded everyone treat her as an equal. The wives were flustered with Jackson’s demands and forced their husbands to resign from office, including Eaton and Van Buren. The mass resignations led Jackson to form a “Kitchen Cabinet” filled with immoral advisors.
In the book, Cheathem described and articulated how Andrew Jackson’s life was shaped in the South. Through culture, Jackson formed his persona and ideals. It is evident that Cheathem has a vast understanding of Southern culture. Therefore, his article about Andrew Jackson Donelson’s honor, who is Andrew Jackson’s nephew, should be considered as an extension of Cheathem’s immense knowledge of the history of the South and its culture.
Watson’s book further describes that Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay mainly had political differences, morals, and characteristics. Although Andrew Jackson- like Henry Clay- was a supporter of increased democracy and economic development, he and his supporters still tended to believe that the growing wealth and power of
The story about his wife, Rachel, caught my attention. I can’t imagine how she must have felt for having her past pointed out, and to have Jackson’s rivals using that against him was just…awful. Besides that, it was interesting to see everyone’s perception of Jackson back then. The Indians saw him as someone cruel as the devil, while those from the lower class liked him because they could relate to him. I wonder what opinions we might get if we asked people nowadays about their views on Andrew Jackson.
We also get a good glimpse into a volatile behavior of Andrew Jackson, and a society that will do anything to prove a point even if it means destroying a family name. With very little up to that point written about the Jacksons, this story is a nice look at their history as it is essentially a biography of Rachel as the story follows her life through its end.
According to Thomas P. Abernethy, Jackson was “a frontier nabob who took sides against the democratic movement in his own state…an opportunist for whom democracy was good talk with which to win the favor of the people and thereby accomplish ulterior objectives.” Different views of Jackson continued the debate about who he really was as a leader. It was not until historian Arthur Schlesinger, took a different look at the study of Jackson. He believed that Jackson’s presidency was designed to suppress the power of capitalists, and try to help those of the lower classes. Other historians continued to disagree with Schlesinger, while others supported his idea or enhanced it, saying Jackson was almost similar to a Marxist.
In the article “Abuse of Power: Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act of 1830,” the author, Alfred A. Cave, writes about President Jackson’s abuse of power. He is arguing that Jackson abused his power when he was enforcing the Indian Removal Act. He argues that Jackson broke guarantees he made to the Indians. He uses a political methodology and uses secondary sources.
The era of Andrew Jackson which was nicknames the era of the “common man” certainly lived up to its name. As the seventh President of the United States, Jackson had a major effect on the life of the common man, in such a way that the life of the common man would never be the same again. Jackson’s aim, after the manner in which he was defeated in the Presidential Election of 1824, despite receiving more popular votes than John Quincy Adams who took on the office, was to reduce the power and the authority of the elite. When he came into power after the 1828 election Jackson began to carry out his proposals. Jackson expanded the voting right to all men, in accordance with the Declaration of Independence of 1776 which declared that “all men are created equal” instead of just the elite.
The Long, Bitter Trail: Andrew Jackson and the Indians written by Anthony F.C. Wallace is the story of the Native Americans being forced to move west in America in the 19th century. Wallace begins by introducing the desire for Native American land in the U.S. and ends with the aftermath of the Removal Policy and the legacy that still lives today. The book is organized into four chapters; The Changing Worlds of the Native Americans, The Conflict over Federal Indian Policy, The Removal Act, and The Trail of Tears.
Andrew Jackson, being a tyrant, abused his power in his time of presidency. He was the 7th president, but before Jackson’s presidency, he had no political experience. One of the only things that really qualified him was the hardships he went through when he was younger. His father had died while Jackson was young and Jackson received the reputation as a “self-made man”, or an independent man.
Andrew Jackson during his time was considered a very patriotic politician he hated the rich, he hated the Indian, and loved the idea of slavery. It has been said that he grew up not educated and had a bad up bring but still managed to get to a high political suture. Jackson at one point was general and had a very decorated portfolio, which made sense he would become president, Andrew was most well know for “The Battle of New Orleans” where Andrew Jackson, prevented the British Army and General Edward Pakenham, from seizing New Orleans nearing the end of that war.
Jacksonland by Steve Inskeep is an interesting book that describes the lives of President Andrew Jackson and the Cherokee leader John Ross. It describes the connections between their lives and the demise of their relationship from fighting together to fighting each other. It uses historical accounts and letters to help describe what life was like during the rough times that unfolded during the early 1800s. Not only does Inskeep describe what makes these two men famous, but he also describes their lives before fame. This includes the actions that resulted in them becoming famous.
Ok, so imagine yourself in your home just minding your own business, when, BOOM! The government is at your door with guns pointed at you, the only choice you have now is to obey their orders. Which, are not the easiest to obey. This is because imagined you is an Indian and made the mistake of being in the US during the Trail of Tears. Thanks to Jackson, the beast, you have been evicted from your home and forced to move to Oklahoma.
Born into a non-aristocratic poor family, somewhere in the Carolina’s on March 14, 1767, was a man named Andrew Jackson. Jackson, also called “Old Hickory” was a very bold proactive man in American history. From being a military hero and founding the democratic party to enacting the trail of tears and dismantling the of the Bank of the United States, the man and his legacy are a prominent topic for scholarly debate. Some believe he was a great president and some believe he was the worse president. But if you look at it from a moral perceptive or in the eyes of a foreigner, Jackson’s legacy was far more villainous than heroic.