Jacksonian Democracy was a 19th-century political philosophy that gained prevalence through the American populace, becoming the nation’s dominant political view for a generation. Spanning from the beginning of Andrew Jackson’s presidency to approximately the 1940s, it placed a much greater emphasis on the “greater democracy for the common man”. The impacts of this philosophy have extended well beyond the 1940s. Andrew Jackson himself had infused the country with greater democratic ideologies and character, something seen evidently in present-day America. Jacksonian Democrats viewed themselves as the “guardians” of the United States Constitution thought that reasoning is flawed. Afterall, actions do speak louder than words and although these Jacksonian “Democrats” had sometimes maintained their intentions, there were also multiple instances when they actually contradicted these original objectives. All things considered, Jacksonian Democrats were not the “guardians” of the Constitution but rather the epitome of an utmost failure to uphold their beliefs. These reasons include but are not limited to the support of (1) the development of a “herrenvolk democracy”, a system where minorities were disenfranchised, (2) the veto of rechartering the National bank—leading to disastrous consequences (3), and the lack of political freedom through media censorship.
Firstly, one of the goals of the President Andrew Jackson was to give more power to the common person. As President Andrew Jackson wrote in his letter to Dr. Bronough, 1822. He took away the land requirements which led to many more people voting. Previously only landowners were allowed to vote therefore only favoring high-class citizens. The higher class citizens did not like this because it decreased their power to influence the government. Allowing more people to vote was an admirable thing President Andrew Jackson did which is one of the reasons worth remembering him on the twenty dollar bill.
Did you ever know that Andrew Jackson, the 7th president of the United States, was the first commoner ever to be elected president? Before he was elected in 1828, his supporters helped him win the nation’s voters. They helped him create more of a democratic type of government. A good democracy consists of a strong leader who is organized and fair. A strong leader makes decisions with the help of the other branches and the votes of the people. Also, a strong leader should promote peace and stability in the government. Many common people supported, elected, and named Jackson a man of the people. Andrew Jackson was known to have a temper and he always wanted to fight for what he thought was right. He sometimes rarely listened to other ideas and opinions about certain conflicts in the government and country. Andrew Jackson did not promote democracy well. This is true because Andrew Jackson took away some equal rights and he didn’t follow the checks and balances when it came to making important decisions.
President Andrew Jackson had a strong view on the American economy. He mistrusted many policies and in his time in office drastically changed them to suit his views and ideals. After winning the 1828 election against John Quincy Adams and the 1832 election against Henry Clay, Jackson’s time in office was unquestioned. In his administration, Jackson’s economic policies led to the Panic of 1837 and transformed the American banking system. Jackson’s view on economy lead him to instate acts that significantly transformed the system of American economy such as the abolition of the second Bank of the United States. He mistrusted paper money greatly, as well as believed in power to the common people.
The time has come to make a judgement of the great Andrew Jackson, the 7th president of the United States from 1829~1837. Although some people didn’t like Jackson very well due to very few of his decisions, he made many good decisions during his presidency. Andrew Jackson should be remembered as a hero of the common man due to his unifying leadership, generous approach of governing, and concern for economic equality.
Andrew Jackson was one of the greatest presidents who made very difficult decisions for our country. Although his choices were not always the popular decision, he made choices that were always promoting democracy. The things that make a good democracy are: giving people a say in government, having a good leader that you can trust to make wise decisions, peace and stability between each country and other states, and having equal power in the government (checks and balances). Andrew Jackson came into office with a popular vote and great support. His supporters viewed him as a man of the people. Andrew Jackson promoted democracy well. This is true because he kept peace and stability between the nation and he provided people equal rights.
Jackson expanded the voting right to all men, in accordance with the Declaration of Independence of 1776 which declared that “all men are created equal” instead of just the elite. Jackson developed the economy in a way that no man had too much but every man were financially stable. Jackson built new roads and made other infrastructural improvements especially in the south that were of benefit to the more working class “common man”. Jackson also introduced many Acts and Movements that would help to improve the United States and improve the lives of all US citizens.
Andrew Jackson was seen as a common man the voice of the people by some. By others he was King Andrew, trampling the constitution and instigating tyranny. Jackson’s presidency impacted democracy, through his use of the veto power, and his claim of Clay creating a “corrupt bargain”, which is not a turning point for a rise in democracy despite him giving white male suffrage.
Andrew Jackson believed that he was a guardian of the Constitution .He was fixing the faulty interpretation of the constitution put forth by his fellow congress men. Jackson saw the banks as “monopoly of foreign and domestic exchange” he believed the wealthy people were using the banks to line their pockets with more money. One of Jackson’s opponents, Daniel Webster of Mass. . He believed that Jackson had no true facts on his assessment, in fact he saw the veto as alarming. In westers view, Jackson was using the constitutional argument to support his own grab for power. The Whigs, that where like the federalists that where years before them, viewed the national bank as both necessary and constitutional.
Thus Jackson had pitched himself the champion of the people, he had won the popular vote, but the people’s mandate had been usurped by an allegedly corrupt political elite. Furthermore, whilst president, in 1832 Andrew Jackson faced the renewal of a banking institution deemed to be counter to the interests of the people: the Second Bank of the United States. In the event that the Bank be reinstituted, the Bank would receive exclusive privileges in the legislature granted in favour of financial interests over public interests. Consequentially, this move was viewed by Jackson as counter to the people’s interests, and he executively opposed the bill by vetoing its approval. Thus, Jackson had to operate in a political arena contended by corrupt political elites, and influenced by financial interests at the expense of economic justice for the American
Andrew Jackson was not a successful President. Many of his policies were selfish. For example, so me of his monetary policies led to the Panic of 1837. He also ended the Bank of the United States. He took the money form the Bank of the United States and put it into “pet banks”, which contributed to the Panic of 1837. He also passed the INdian removal law, blatantly ignored the supreme court decision. He was also a very corrupt president. He had a spoils system, ended internal improvement, and he curbed the power of the national government while increasing the power of the president.
Based on the major events that occurred in Jackson’s life, our group has come to the conclusion that Andrew Jackson was a bad president. This final resolution was reached after visiting numerous sources regarding both perspectives of this argument. The events that make up our argument comprise of the elimination of the Bank of the United States, the legalization of the Indian Removal Act, and other small but major incidents. We will also be dismantling several opposing arguments, such as the Jacksonian Democracy, and thus reinforcing our frame of mind.
He gave his friends powerful positions instead of the best possible people. “He made most of his decisions with the help of trusted friends and political supporters (Hart 261). He would rather give his friends power than make the general population happy and in good hands. He is not a person for the people. He also angered people so much, that there was almost a state who left America. He made a tax on imported goods and that did not make everyone happy. “But southerners opposed tariffs for several reasons”(Hart 262). He didn't care about the people and he just made the tax. Andrew Jackson does not represent
The Birth of Modern politics written by Lynn Hudson Parsons reviews the years and lives of John Adams and Andrew Jackson and explains how these two men altered American Politics with their personal biases’, opinions, beliefs and practices. Parsons established that the positions and the methods used by these were structural, creating two different parties over time. The 1828 presidential elections have remained the model for all campaigns that followed. Even though as the author claims that the elections were momentous and crucial in history, it changed American politics as well as our nation by evidence from various sources and his own logic opinions.
The period of antebellum America, 1820-1830, Jacksonian democrats, led by war hero and man of the people Andrew Johnson created a new vastly popular political party. The Jacksonian democrats portrayed themselves as the saviors of the “common man” and attempted to destroy the aristocracy in America. The democrats were essentially guardians of the United States Constitution and the protectors of individual liberties. The Jacksonian democracy was built on the following principles, expanded suffrage,