Animal Farm: Flaws Of A Dictatorship

631 Words3 Pages

Navdeep Brar Mrs. Julieta De Paula English 30S 17 January 2023 Flaws of a Dictatorship shown in “Animal Farm” Although dictatorships can be effective if the right is in power, almost all the time, power corrupts the ruler. A form of government where the people have no say can’t be any good. In the novella "Animal Farm” by George Orwell, Napoleon, a young, power-hungry pig gains power which leads him into leading a completely totalitarian regime. When Napoleon's regime takes a turn for the worst the rights of the animals and the laws of the farm become completely meaningless. Making Napoleon's control indistinguishable from the farm's previous oppressors, humans. Under a dictatorship, the fundamental rights of citizens are suppressed. Napoleon’s jurisdiction is no different, basic rights such as freedom of speech are hugely censored. Napoleon, on several occasions, uses his dogs to suppress any thoughts that may slightly oppose him. For instance, when some of the other …show more content…

Take for example the USSR (The United Soviet Socialist Republics) which is what Animal Farm is an allegory of. Dictatorships themselves are not bad but most rulers become power-hungry causing them to become ruthless against anyone who dares to oppose them. Boxer, the male horse, somewhat opposed Napoleon regarding the mass executions and had some injuries, was sent straight to the horse slaughterhouse, talk about ruthlessness! Napoleon’s authoritarian rule over Animal Farm causes the farm to become what it once fought against for. At the end of the book the pigs and the humans become indistinguishable from one another. “The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which (Orwell 95)” The way the pigs walk, talk, dress and rule becomes the same, if not worse, than their previous oppressors, the

Open Document