When I think of theatre I think of Shakespeare. One of the greats who played a big part in establishing theatre in the world. Of course, Shakespeare’s time period was quite a long time ago, he himself does not live on into this world. Theatre itself, as well as his work, has continued on living into our time. How long will this art last? After reading the article, for the most part agree with what Warman is saying. Warman says that theatre is supposed to be mischiefious, playful mischief. Warman believes that when watching a performance, you’re supposed to be taken out of your world, into a new reality. If you can’t engage the audience into a new reality then they will be bored. Boredom is a plague to the world of theatre. Once an …show more content…
Theatre is a beautiful art form. Warman mentions in the article that overtime people gained more freetime in which that time is usually boring. I felt that theatre played a big part in filling that bored time slot. Long ago when theatre was just starting out, there wasn’t a lot to do. They didn’t have cellphones to get on, or video games to play. They would go to the theatre and see a play. Warmen said that you went to the theatre to have fun, correct? That’s sucessful theatre. Theatre has to of been sucessful for it to of survived this long. With technology being where it is, why does theatre still exist? If you were new to our planet, why would you ever go to a play over a movie? A movie has all the special effects, there are no messups and you don’t even have to leave your home. With all of this people still go to plays? A large quantity of them beiing young people according to Warman. I believe this is because theatre goes above and beyond in making a personal connection with the audience. When you watch a movie you have no connection with it. There are all kinds of great movies, but you have no connection to a motion picture. In a play the audience is all part of the play. Theatre is all live. There human touch to it. There is room for error. What if someone slips and falls? What if the actor forgets his line? That is all improvisation which is what makes a play so unique. Would the audience
The Seagull does this, but only to a short extent- there is a small play performed within the play, and there is talk about the relevance of theatre and art to modern life. In contrast, SFB is a veritable motherload of meta. The characters know that they’re characters, and that they happen to be performing for you. They even know that they’re specifically in an adaptation- in our specific production vision, we like to see it as our characters taking the story into their own hands to retell it. The audience see two overlapping worlds: the reality the characters face in the plot of the play, and the constructed reality of a theatrical
During the performance you were encouraged to laugh and engage in the play that is a huge difference from having to be quiet at the art institute. Another is the performance was the art of using human bodies to do tricks and the painting was oil on canvas making no set
This play does just that. It looks deeper than just an entertaining night at the theatre it encourages conversation and debate. It forces people to discuss the uncomfortable topics and increases understanding of unfamiliar situations. I watched the audience cringe and become uncomfortable, I saw the characters bring us together and tear us apart, but most of all I felt a connection, an understanding with my fellow audience members when we all walked out together still saddens by the events that had taken place. If your are looking for an intriguing night filled with a roller coaster of emotion that leads to a deeper understand of your fellow humans than this is the show for
Aristotle wrote The Poetics in 335 BCE and in them he stated the elements that he believed made great theatre. He wrote that the ultimate goal of theatre is for the audience to have some sort of catharsis at the end. This to me is one of the few things that still rings extremely true from The Poetics, which with the advent of modern theatre have become a bit obsolete. Catharsis on the other hand, will never become obsolete, because everyone at some point needs to release their pent up emotions. That is the exact reason I got into theatre, because I want to be able to give someone that catharsis, however, what I wasn’t expecting was to be able to have many cathartic experiences
The Greeks were the first to introduce the concept of theater. As a matter of fact, one performer, Thespis, created the idea of a chorus, which was a group of people that expressed opinions, gave advice, and had the author’s point of view. The chorus would be the equivalent to the “score” in modern theater. The International Thespian Society, an organization formed to honor student’s success in the theater, was named after Thespis. In Greek theater, the place that the actors performed was called the “paraskene,” while in modern theater it is called the stage.
As matter of fact, the actors at some points are out in the audience, which makes for a kind of unique experience; things like lighting cues, set pieces just kind of spice it up. I think people will recognize the touch TJ theatre puts on
They created a whole new genre of plays, musical play. Unlike what was being shown before, ( Musical comedies ) they musical plays’ main focus what not comedy. The musical play and musical comedy are still today the two major branches of Musical theatre. Each is thriving, artistically and commercially, because it has its own place and purpose. Theatre in a more recent era, ( 2000’s ) was inspired by boring history made interesting.
Unfortunately, as stated by Peter Brook, Deadly theatre is recognized as the most common and seen type of theatre, also known as “bad theatre”. This means is that this type of theatre is identified from performances perpetuated to be dull, boring, traditional, consumeristic and conventional. Hence, as Brook states, one of the reasons why this type of theatre still remains is due to the deadly spectators who enjoy watching a performance with lack of intensity and entertainment. Likewise, other individuals have the tendency to associate culture and tradition with historical costumes and the sensation of being bored. Therefore, the right amount of boringness can create the illusion that the play was worthwhile to see (Brook,
Have you ever felt that the entertainment industry has become too predictable? How far have we really come? I often feel the same way, and ask myself the same thing. I believe the entertainment industry has evolve quite splendidly from 384 B.C. to 2015 A.D. I feel that the Romans idolized the concept of theatre, but didn’t have any interest for the actors involved. My understanding is that the Romans wanted to become emotionally invested in the stories of tragedies and comedies, and didn’t want to perceive the characters as actors.
“William Shakespeare’s Impact on Theater” says that “Theater, in particular, has experienced many changes due to his influence,” and without any major influence like Shakespeare to guide the changes of theater, it would be extremely different (Octane 1). Shakespeare introduced many new elements to theater because of how his writing was unique in his time period. Despite this, his writing appealed to many different audiences. For instance, Octane says that “The way in which Shakespeare’s plots move forward has helped define modern play-writing. Similarly, Shakespeare’s complex characterizations have brought forth a new type of storytelling in which characters’ choices drive plots forward” and “His plays were often imbued with universal truths of human existence, rather than acting as mirrors of the privileged life.
This dislike in Naturalistic theatre led
Rousseau is staunchly opposed to the notion of attending theater, and other forms of entertainment, inside halls or auditoriums because that environment severs the individual’s ties to nature. According to Rousseau, when someone partakes in theater indoors, they are isolating themselves from all those around them while being engrossed in the performance and story. His solution is to revert back to the times of open-air amphitheaters reminiscent of Ancient Greece and Rome. By leaving the “gloomy cavern” of the theater where the audience member is only able to connect with the fictional story and entering the shining sun, the individual is then able to achieve happiness. Rousseau furthers his assertion that outside performances are superior,
The reference to the end of theatres insights at the risk that famous theater exemplifies for a rightist state or any abusive framework. Comic drama, and comic figures are more viable in bringing out giggling which holds a hatred toward the end of chuckling dissimilar to the impact of purge which permits disdain to be cleansed. In Accidental Death of an Anarchist, the Madman a comedian like figure with which the neighborhood individuals of the proletariat and working population can undoubtedly distinguish and acknowledge his viewpoint. The Madman has changed over his 'guaranteed franticness " into a position of focal point for standing up to the group of onlookers what the crowd maybe knows however needs to learn it all things considered to create affirmed disappointment and offense concerning the State
To add on, some people might say “theater is not a necessity in life”. So what? Theater just gets taken away, which is too heartbreaking to understand when it’s not within people’s grasps. Theater might not be an essential for survival, but the importance of this argument is that it can improve in the educational system. And isn’t that what it is all about?