Ronald Carlson wanted nothing more but justice for his sister who had been murdered. Ronald talks about how he would have killed the man with his own hands if he would have gotten the chance but his mind quickly changed after he seen his sister's murder being executed, he has a new view on the situation now. He talks about how watching the execution left him full of horror and emptiness. Ronald asks a question that should be addressed he said, “Our justice system should not be dictated by vengeance.” He asked, “As a society, shouldn’t we be more civilized than the murderers we condemn?” We should be more civilized, we shouldn't have the right to sentence people to death for three reasons, it puts innocent lives at risk, it's extremely costly …show more content…
Studies conducted by the people behind the death penalty information center, have shown that African Americans were over 80 percent of the people condemned by the death penalty in Pennsylvania. In the united states 82% of the studies the race of the victim was found to influence the likelihood of being charged with capital murder or receiving the death penalty. Those who murdered whites were found more likely to be sentenced to death than those who murdered blacks (deathpenaltyinfo). 5. Counterclaim Although the death penalty may bring some closure to families of the victims and even the victims themselves it still should be abolished because the negatives outweigh the positives. People could be murdered by the state even if they are innocent. They are taking away any chance these people have at a normal life even though it's a life that they deserve and did nothing to have it taken away. 6. Conclusion In conclusion the idea that the death penalty should be abolished can be supported by many reasons that include extensive evidence. With the death penalty still established we are putting innocent people's lives at risk, spending millions, and continue with racial segregation. The idea that someone's opinion in court can decide the fate of another person is
My proposal and personal recommendation is to abolish the death penalty on a national level. I do not think that it benefits society as much as it harms individuals and causes unnecessarily excessive judicial costs. However, I still believe that the death penalty should remain in effect for some extraneous situations. The federal government should still be able to preform executions when it deems them necessary. Yet I believe that traditional murder sentencing’s should be free of
J.R.R Tolkien once said, “many that live deserves death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.” The death penalty should be repealed because its very stressful for those involved, it is extremely expensive, and it has convicted innocent people.
Humans lifes is in danger, if we do not do something about it. We have the death penalty for a reason. There should not be nothing wrong with the death penalty. The jail houses are overcrowded and it is
Furthermore, it has been documented that in some jurisdictions, Black defendants are given the death penalty
Since the reinstatement of the federal death penalty in 1988, 75 defendants have been sentenced to death of whom 3 have been executed and 10 have been finally removed from death row, according to The Death Penalty Information Center. Given the popularity of the death penalty in present day America, it is fair to assume that there are perhaps justifications for it, though there are plenty of people who firmly oppose it. Without going into the details of any given judicial system, there are several reasons to support both sides of the argument. Capital punishment is such a powerful notion, although not all crimes are punishable by death, there are many advantages to being pro-death penalty when it applies. Death penalty costs the government less
In 2016, at least 3,117 people were sentenced to death across 55 countries, which is the highest number to recorded in just a year. The actual number of people who were executed in that 2016 is approximately 1,032 that mostly happened in Iran, Iraq, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. With the remaining prisoners who are still sentenced to death, there is a possibility of commutation to lifetime imprisonment instead of a death penalty in the future. Imagine they are living their lives in prison while their victims have no voice at all because of the crime they committed. With that being said, we are in favour of capital punishment for these reasons; capital punishment creates an emotional or psychological effect to people that have experienced heart wrenching incidents and having prisoners only convicted lifetime
Throughout the years death penalty has become less popular. The public opinion asserts that incarceration is far worse punishment than the death penalty. Death penalty is unconstitutional, everyone has the right to live. The death penalty was created as a punishment to the extreme of extreme cases, but now states are using it constantly and randomly. The death penalty has many flaws.
People are executed by the capital punishment for a variety of crimes every day in the world. Some countries execute people who were under 18, innocent people, and helpless women. The death penalty is cruel, inhuman and regarding. Death penalty does not determine the crimes, violate the human rights, used as political tools, unfair for poor people. There are many types of execution which is used in different country around the world.
Over the last decades there has been a lot of controversy about rather the death penalty should be supported. The biggest controversy revolved around society questioning if the government should reserve the right to execute murders. Many argued that murder was murder regardless of who's committing it. They believed that allowing the government to execute murders was a conflict of interest because the government suggest that murder is a cruel crime so they also shouldn't be allowed to commit it because they make the rules regardless of the circumstances. Individual thats support the death penalty believe in the “eye for eye” theory which basically suggest if someone takes a life there life should also be taken from them for the crime the committed.
The major reason why the death penalty should be abolished is that the cost of the death penalty is too much and the USA is in debt to many other countries. What this means is that the death penalty should be abolished and also the cost death penalty is more than the cost of maximum sentence life in prison. According to J. Marceau and H. Whitson, “The Cost of Colorado’s Death penalty,” 3 Univ. of Denver Criminal Law Review “A new study of the cost of the death penalty in Colorado revealed that capital proceedings require six times more days in court and
Death Penalty According to the 2010 Gallup Poll, 64% of the United State of America are supporting the death penalty, I as an American am part of that 36% that is against it. I do not believe that we as human being should determine whether another person should live or die. A second reason that I am against the death penalty is for the reason that the accused person could be innocent and normally the accused person only has one court presentation and is only judged by the judge not a jury of their peer, and is sent to death row where they pay for a crime that they haven’t done. My final reason that i do not believe that the death penalty should count as a punishment for the American people is because, a person that has done a massive massacre shouldn’t just be able to leave the world just like that without paying and suffering for what they have done, Or should the death punishment continue as it is for it has a great benefit to us as citizens of the United States.
The death penalty should be abolished in America. It can be discriminatory, in fact, statistics show that forty percent of death row inmates are African-American. Minority groups are more likely to receive the death penalty than white people, especially if they committed a crime against a white person. Usually, minority peoples have a harder time being able to afford effective lawyers and psychiatrists. There is a threat of wrongful conviction too.
Lena Baker, a poor African American female, was put to death by an all white, rich male jury for the murder of Ernest Knight. Ernest was a white rich man who hired Lena to be his personal maid who unfortunately abused his power towards her. He enslaved her, even though slavery was and still is illegal. He was killed in the early 1940’s by Lena Baker. The jury overlooked these details towards race, wealth, and defense and sentenced her to death in 1945.
To begin with one of the arguments against the death penalty system is that it puts innocent lives at risk. This occurs where wrongfully accused or innocent- presumed guilty individuals are sentenced to death row. The existing stress on quicker implementations, less resources for the accused, and an increase in the number of death cases mean that the execution of the not-guilty people is unavoidable. Courts are allowing executions to occur even when not sure about the defendant 's guilt. This majorly occurs to the less privileged individuals who cannot stand up for their rights or the oppressed who cannot do anything about the position they find themselves in.
In doing so civilization needs to become better advanced in living with each other as a whole. “The death penalty is barbaric and violate the cruel and unusual clause in the bill of rights” (“Should the Death Penalty be