A country where all drugs are legalized can be the perfect economic and social compromise. Ultimately, it contains the both of best worlds as it would allow for the economy to flourish due to the infusion of new income from tax reforms. Drug liberalization is the next step for the United States for us to become a new country with limited violence less drug abuse and a better prison system. Drug liberalization needs to happen and happen fast for the progression of the people as a civilization.
Portugal in 2001 decided to take the initiative to decriminalize all drugs within the country. Within the limitations as there are restrictions to how much is legally allowed to be carried. If we look at the statistic for which Portugal has benefited from, when we see the drug us that has continued into adulthood in 2001 it was about 45% to about 27% in 2012 which shows how the prevalence in today’s society. This statistic can show how the exposure to drugs
…show more content…
So why not attack the problem at the fuse directly? The world could be totally different as we have lost so many potential world changers and future leaders due to our war on drugs. The difference is on the way and should happen soon. Now if we look at the not so obvious benefits of the decriminalization of all drugs. Imagine a society where medical offices are allowed to make strides in cancer as HIV we have already discussed would start to have a decreasing rate in the reduction of needle sharing within society. We would also be promoting small business as a lot of dispensaries for certain drugs would start to open up giving struggling families a new source of income. We also would be able to reduce the income tax in America as we now have a greater source of revenue for the government which allows for the consumers to keep their hard-earned dollar to put back into our market to help us advance economically. The United
I also thought it was interesting how people still found a way to bring alcohol into the U.S. and make money off of it even though it was illegal. I suppose it is not that surprising though, since one of the videos mentioned how alcohol was very important in customs of a variety of ethnic groups. I especially liked reading about the company in California telling their customers how to turn grape juice into wine. I wonder if the details were clearly written in a caution note on the packaging. Or I wonder if it was concealed, but still written so that if found by prohibitionists the company could say it was another caution
The White House states, "In July 2001, Portugal decriminalized the personal use and possession of all illicit drugs" (Drugs in Portugal). Life in Portugal is free; this freedom allows
It is shocking to see that although we have already tried this approach we are trying it again. The similarities between the prohibition of alcohol and the war on drugs is something that can not be denied. Much like today, in the 1920’s you could see a raise in the population of people who went to prison, organise crime, and the amount of people who actually use the drugs. People lost their jobs because of alcohol just like people lose their jobs because of drugs. People found new ways to get alcohol just like today people found new ways to get their hands on drugs.
Proponents of drug legalization, such as myself, argue that it could have a number of societal benefits. For one thing, it may help to reduce the number of weak addicts by making drugs more widely available and less valuable. As a result, employers would no longer have to worry about hiring people with drug addictions, potentially leading to a more competitive job market. Furthermore, legalization might contribute to economic growth by generating new jobs in the drug industry and money through taxes and regulations.
The consumption of drugs have always been a part of society, from tobacco used by the native Americans to the coco leaf used by mayans, people exhibit a tendency to use narcotics. While drugs were used for medicinal purposes risks were still associated with them as they are today. As with most things, narcotics can be harmful, and even dangerous, while drugs do not usually cause a society to collapse, it does have a profound effect on how societies function as in the case of the 1900s. While there were positives to the initial inaction of prohibition it was more detrimental than beneficial.
Overall, Gore Vidal’s argument of legalizing drugs is very compelling. The style of writing is unique and keeps the reader interested. Vidal takes a popular argument (in 2016) and provides a sound argument in support of
The main issue when it comes to drugs in the United States is the inefficient policies and sentencing laws that have been created. Also, the injustices within these policies pertaining primarily to race. Once the “war on drugs” was claimed the only way the government and law enforcement saw fit to handling this skyrocketing issue was to incarcerate offenders. Although this solution worked for a while, other alternatives needed to be made. However, these alternatives were not made and this left the drug policies, sentencing laws, and injustices at a standstill.
The legalization of drugs has been at the center of interminable debate. Drugs have widely been perceived as a dominant threat to the moral fabric of society. Drug use has been attributed as the source responsible for a myriad of key issues. For instance, it is believed that drugs have exacerbated the already weak status of mental health in the United States in which some individuals suffering from mental illness administer illicit substances such as heroin or cocaine in an attempt to self-medicate. Moreover, drugs are blamed for turning auspicious members of the community into worthless degenerates.
Today many countries try to regulate the numbers of drugs users as many as they can by using the scary promotions and commercials to attract the attention from people, albeit ineffective. Rather than using the outmoded methods, legitimacy should be announced for all drugs in order that the regulation will process more ease for the government. In this procedure, the government can legislate the limitations for drugs consumption and people will be able to understand drug disadvantages profoundly. Therefore, allowing drugs as ordinary substances will abate the drug consumption. The aforementioned issue, in brief, the drugs is a too danger to leave it as it is so it should be legalized.
Prohibition was a period of 13 years in U.S. history in which the manufacture, sale, and transportation of liquor was made illegal from 1920 to 1933. It was known as the “Noble Experiment” and led to the first and only time an Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was repealed. There were many reasons for why prohibition was introduced, one was that a ban on alcohol would practically boost supplies of important grains such as barley. Another was, when America entered the war in 1917, the national mood turned against drinking alcohol.
If drugs were legal in the Untied States and people were educated on their affects, the drug world would eventually eradicate
Would the decriminalisation and / Legalisation of controlled substances improve or hinder the economic, health and social circumstances of drugs users, their families, communities and society? This essay will briefly outline the current policies on drugs in Ireland and will examine the policies and substance misuse from a European and international perspective; then it will discuss how decriminalisation of drugs and substances can improve or hinder the economic, health and social circumstances of drug users, their families, communities and society in general. Examples of controlled substances in Ireland include cocaine, heroin, methadone, cannabis (full list of controlled substances found in the schedule Misuse of Drugs Act 1977).
To be honest I think the “War on Drugs” has been a losing battle for decades. If you look at our history during 1960s and Vietnam War time frame you will notice drug use became a popular norm within society. President Nixon was the first to declare war on drugs in 1971-1972, but Presidents Carter, Reagan and even Clinton made proposals regarding drugs. Are text advises us that, “The War on Drugs reshaped the American correctional system (Collica & Furst, 2012, Sec. 4.3). Even with the drug laws constantly changing and getting tougher, criminals and drug offenders keep finding ways to design new drugs, grow, distribute and hide their business through various means.
The historical lesson of prohibition proves that where a demand for an illegal substance exists, someone will supply it; efforts to ban the sale of alcoholic beverages failed because bootleggers and speakeasies sprang up overnight to satisfy the public's thirst. In the same way, we have seen that prohibition of drugs does not and cannot work. The public is apparently willing to pay almost any price for an illicit "high," and the amounts of money involved insure that suppliers will always be on hand to meet the demand, and there will always be police and customs agents willing to look the other way for a share of the profits. So even if legalization were extremely undesirable for other reasons, the simple fact that prohibition doesn't work would argue strongly for
As of recent, the war on drugs has been a very often discussed topic due to many controversial issues. Some people believe the War on Drugs has been quite successful due to the amount of drugs seized and the amount of drug kingpins arrested. I believe this to be the wrong mindset when it comes to the war on drugs. The war on drugs isn’t a winnable one so we must do all that is possible to assist those who struggle with drug addiction and decriminalize small amounts of drugs. These minor changes in the way we combat drugs will create significant change and have lasting effects.