CONCUSSION Character Study & Author Analysis
Name Aditi Vijendra, Vedika Singhania, Alina Salem
Directions: Cite who the following characters/real life people are and then analyze the listed relationships. In addition, include one piece of evidence from the book to support your points.
Dr. Bennet Omalu
Introverted
Ambitious
Persistent
Quirky
Naive
Evidence: “And guess what, I would leave. I would come to the USA. The land of perfection and excellence. A land where mankind is at its best. The land of milk and honey” (Laskas 51).
This shows how Bennet was very naive and believed that America was the land of “perfection” and “milk and honey”
Dr. Cyril Wecht
Boisterous
Aggressive
Evidence: “‘Okay.” ‘Eat some pastries,’ Wecht said. ‘No,
…show more content…
Chris Nowinski
Lucrative
Cheater
Attempts to take credit for Omalu’s work
Takes advantage of Bennet
Evidence: “At this point, he still trusted Nowinski. He thought Nowinski was simply a loud and brash angel. He admired loud and brash angels. He figured he and Nowinski were alike in that way, outcasts fighting for legitimacy and finally finding some” (Laskas 179).
This quote demonstrates how Bennet was fooled by Nowinski and how this made it very easy for Nowinski to take advantage of him and claim credit for his work
Jason Luckasevic
Brother of Omalu’s former co-worker
Good lawyer
Efficient
Good friend of Omalu
Unsure of himself as a lawyer
Evidence: On pages 183-184, Omalu and Luckasevic are talking about how they both know that the NFL is committing a huge fraud by lying about CTE. Bennet is persistently trying to convince him to sue the NFL, since he knows that Luckasevic will win. But Luckasevic is unsure of doing something as big as that.
Persistent
Relationships:
Omalu and his family
…show more content…
This shows how Nowinski went behind Omalu’s back when they were working with each other.
Author Analysis
Consider how the author Jeanne Marie Laskas, an investigative journalist, put together this story that is not objective. Analyze the author’s style. Include at least four different points and bullet point these.
The story is written from an omniscient perspective.
Almost as if it was an investigative journal because of amount of detail and information given, such as details of Bennet’s family background, his personality traits, his affiliations, etc.
The story started with present court case, went back to before Bennet was born, and worked its way, chronologically back to present.
This is much like investigative journalism because it is very chronological and specific
The story is subjective even though due to Laskas’ background in investigative journalism, we would expect an objective story
This could possibly be because she wanted to switch things up and write in a perspective that she is not used to or that she doesn’t do for a living to make it more enjoyable for
The lives of Olga Polites, and her family, were rattled to their very foundation when a beloved family member was savagely murdered. Prior to this tragedy, Olga had stood, adamantly, on the side against capital punishment. Throughout the course of her article, she explains how her stance has been shaken. Such a heinous act, occurring to her so personally, had changed her views. She states that, instead of viewing the shooter as a person, she was “indifferent… to his personal plight.
Today we’ll be looking into two of our beloved characters from the book Marci and Corin. Within the following paragraph, we’ll look at their personalities, how they are as a character, how are they like throughout the book. We check out their motivation what keeps their wheel spinning day in and day out. Last but not least we’ll look into their strength. The book What night Brings brings us a lot of relatable ongoing conflicts.
The aforementioned perspectives are explored through the limited omniscient third person narrator, who narrates in a factual tone and provides the lens from which events are viewed. Although the narrator is omniscient in the traditional sense, as he or she has access to the thoughts of all characters, the narrator is limited in that he or she solely follows Anton’s journey. Consequently, the events that transpired previous to and following the assault remain ambiguous and fluctuate as new information is introduced by supporting characters. Within the exposition, The Assault features Anton’s perspective on the events leading up to the incident.
He starts his essay with a big story catching the readers ' attentions and immediately after that he talks about how a sex offenders probation works, making his point
Throughout chapters 8 and 9, the author showed his bias towards Chris McCandless, which is an act of defiance to his position as an objective journalist, when he attempted to alter the readers’ negative point of view towards Chris by the introduction of different people who had similar experiences and characteristics as him and then making comparison. After reading the previous chapters, the readers have already made their own judgement on Chris, which are probably mostly negative. To address this issue, Krakauer initiates chapter 8 by introducing negative comments and mails not only about Chris but also to him, the author. These will serve as an argument that he will later attempt to disprove while at the same time, still informing the readers about what makes Chris special and unique.
With all of those strategies it brings this whole book together. He chose to write a book about a murder that happened in Holcomb,Kansas and he gave very specific details when he got to describing the
The art of persuasion, rhetoric, has allowed speakers and writers to influence others with their words, and Benjamin Banneker uses various compositional techniques in an attempt to liberate his people. He challenges Thomas Jefferson’s pro slavery views by criticizing his racist, and hypocritical, views of blatant human persecution. The vile institution of slavery was an issue that Americans during Banneker’s time blindly accepted. By using allusions to American history, Banneker attempted to prove that Jefferson was a hypocrite of his own American beliefs. Banneker makes a plethora of references to Jefferson’s hypocrisy, such as the line “you cannot acknowledge that the present freedom and tranquility which you enjoy you have mercifully received and that it is the peculiar blessing of Heaven”.
Disagreements brought among two can greatly cause an uncertain effect on those surrounded by them, as well as each other. Innocent minded children are targeted to be easily influenced. That is until that child starts becoming experienced and learns to lead his own path perpetually discovering his autonomy. Gabriel and Maria, a dissimilar couple introduced from Rudolfo Anaya’s “Bless Me, Ultima”, presents a conflicting environment on those having to deal with their differing ideal beliefs. Maria, a Luna, daughter of a farmer, peaceful and quiet like the moon.
“The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is a story about a man, Sanger Rainsford, whose ideals and overall character change throughout the story, specifically about hunting, due to his encounter with General Zaroff. At the beginning of the story Rainsford is a stuck up man. He could not care less about any other living things other than humans. He believes all living wildlife are expendable and only there for his pleasure of hunting. During the story Rainsford has to make many quick and overall difficult decisions during his encounters with the ocean, General Zaroff, and the island wilderness to survive, that change how he thinks about animals.
Ralph Waldo Emerson once said that, “envy is ignorance; imitation is suicide.” (370). John Knowles’ A Separate Peace is set during World War I at Devon School, a boarding school for boys. The book centers on Gene Forrester, a student at Devon, who could be described as an intelligent, but jealous, conformist. A Separate Peace illustrates Gene’s envy and imitation of his friend, Finny, and how it affects himself and his relationship with Finny, and also how Gene eventually finds peace.
She, like Coras engages the reader by the style of writing to make it more of a story than a legal document. But this book is also an example of contextualization. It is an analysis and study of the case
The book, Percy Jackson: The Battle Of The Labyrinth, by Rick Riordan is an amazing book about a group of demigods (half human half god) that have to save their camp from being destroyed by the evil forces of Kronos. Kronos is a titan that the gods banished to the deepest part of the underworld (Tartarus) after a war against them. Now that the titans are rising once again, the protagonists must travel through an ancient Labyrinth to stop them from demolishing their camp and temporarily halt them from achieving their goal of destroying Mount Olympus and the gods. This literary analysis will show the interesting relationships between some of the characters, and how the setting that they were in affected them throughout their journey.
To be trapped in one's own mind may be the worst prison imaginable. In Charlotte Perkins Gilman's "The Yellow Wallpaper", the narrator of the story is constantly at battle with many different forces, such as John, her husband, the yellow wallpaper that covers the walls of her room, and ultimately herself. Throughout the story the narrator further detaches herself from her life and becomes fixated on the yellow wallpaper that surrounds her in her temporary home, slowly driving her mad. The narrator of "The Yellow Wallpaper" is a major and dynamic character as she is the main character of the story, and throughout the story her personality and ways of thinking change drastically.
In the novel, Ordinary People by Judith Guest, a family goes through the trials of trying to find normalcy after a tragedy strikes. Throughout the story you meet the Jarret family and watch as they progress through the everyday life and the challenges that come with it. Conrad Jarret is an ordinary 17-year-old boy living in Lake Forest, Illinois. Conrad is living with the burden of thinking he is at fault for his brother’s death and blaming himself for the family quandary’s. Conrad, by far, is the most interesting character for the reason that he unquestionably struggles to try to find what he defines as a “normal” life.
Stephanie Plum, Morelli, and Ranger are three main characters in the book, One for the Money, by Janet Evanovich. Stephanie is a young woman struggling to get by in the city of Trenton, New Jersey. After losing her job, she goes against her family’s request and gets the dangerous job of a bounty hunter. She gets assigned Joe Morelli, who was accused of murder and who happened to be a childhood enemy. Stephanie is very inexperienced and receives help from a professional bounty hunter, Ranger.