On May 14, 1607, Jamestown was established and would become the first ever permanent English establishment in North America and thirteen years since then they would later establish Plymouth plantation. Between both Plymouth plantation and Jamestown which one of the where better? They had their similarities with each other and they also had their differences with each other. People may ask which was superior Jamestown or Plymouth plantation you would get different responses, but these reasons will show audience which one is the superior of the two. How were the both of them similar and how were they different? Both places were founded by people who lived in England. In the inception, they both were filled with famine and death, nevertheless, they both had help from the Native Americans who would supply them with food. They had different reasons for …show more content…
If I was compelled to choose between the two places I would choose to live in Plymouth plantation due to the fact it’s a better place to live in with people who can help support each other other than people who think that it's everyone for themselves. The colony known as Jamestown was doomed to fail due to the mindset of everyone in there,as a result of each one of them thinking that it is not their problem that it is someone else's problem so they would not do the work and then the work would not get done with a colony working like this it would not survive for long. Between Plymouth and Jamestown neither were impeccable they both contained their own imperfection, but each of them were individually exceptional Jamestown may have failed to withstand the obstacles they faced, also due to the fact that they failed, they gained experience and would be able to use that experience to help prepare there the other colonies to thrive by identifying their mistakes and fixing
Your part one was spot on and I completely agree with you. The two colonies have much in common, but also have some important differences. They were both backed by companies looking to make a profit, but Jamestown was all young men while Plymouth was more families. Plus, there is the issue of religion which played a huge role in Plymouth but none at all in Jamestown.
Book Response Essay # 2 of America: Jamestown and Plymouth “Early America was littered with European failures- the Spanish in the Florida,the French at Fort Caroline, and the English at Baffin Island, Roanoke, and Sagadahoc”(Horn, 290). Yet, despite all the pervious disasters, two colonies would begin to find apermanent place on the soil of this New World. James Horn painstakingly chronicled thetribulations
To review, they all came together because they believed that God was what caused everything in the universe to happen. Jamestown and Plymouth were very different colonies. They were almost opposite colonies. The main difference was motivations for settling.
The Virginia Colony vs. The Massachusetts Bay Colony Throughout the 17th century, England sent many colonists to settle in the New World. Later on, the two colonies formed the nation America. This doesn’t mean they began with the same ideals and motives. The motivations and reasons for the founding of the Virginia and Massachusetts Bay colonies varied greatly.
While both settlers were met with Natives of the new land, each had two profound differences as to how they went about communicating and living with them. In order to best answer the question that still is of relevance to today’s nation, “Why did Plymouth, rather than Jamestown, earn pride of
The institutions of slavery in Middletown and New England, mirror each other heavily in terms of its justification and abolition. However there variation in the institutions when looking at the Ira Butler's argument of slave societies versus societies with slaves. In both New England and Connecticut, the use of religion was a motivating factor in the institution of a slave society. John Winthrop’s prophetic goal of achieving the “City on a hill” is an example of the religious catalysts that led to the installation of a society with slaves.
I completely agree that Colonial Massachusetts and Colonial Virginia did not have much in common although it is all rooted from their values. Colonial Virginia took a very capitalistic approach towards their settlement. This ambition and greediness caused a lot of agony for both the English settlers of Virginia and African Americans. As stated in the lectures all of the first settlers in Virginia were men looking to get rich and find gold. They came in very underprepared and were very fortunate to have found a specific strain of tobacco.
Although all the colonists all came from England, the community development, purpose, and societal make-up caused a distinct difference between two distinct societies in New England and the Chesapeake region. The distinctions were obvious, whether it be the volume of religious drive, the need or lack of community, families versus single settlers, the decision on minimal wage, whether or not articles of agreements were drawn for and titles as well as other social matters were drawn, as well as where loyalties lay in leaders. New England was, overall, more religious than the Chesapeake region. Settlers in New England were searching relief for religious persecution in Europe. Puritans, Quakers, and Catholics were coming in droves to America searching for an opportunity to have religious freedom.
New England was a colony that was settled because the people that came from England wanted to find their freedom from their country. The people that came to the United States was to find freedom through religion, which the people from Mother England were not given the freedom to pursue their religious believes. The first settlement in New England was when John Winthrop came to the United States. In this settlement came the founders of the colony of New England. Basically the people from the first settlement were the ones that set up the way that the people were going to live and the type of government that they were going to establish and follow.
Although it seems as if both settlements were very different, they had their similarities. Early in the 17th century settlers from England came to North America to escape religious persecution and acquire wealth. The Chesapeake Bay settlers made their wealth through cultivating and selling tobacco. The New England setters were able to freely practice their religion and led a simple life. Both groups settled in and had a fulfilling life that turned into what is now the United States of
The British colonies in the Chesapeake region and those of the New England region were both similar yet different in certain ways. One because both the colonist that settled there were looking for new opportunities. However, it was mostly second son aristocrats, which means the first born usually inherits the better half of the father’s riches. Their lives in England had either been mistreated or they were unable to flourish economically. Regardless of whether they were searching the land for expansive homesteads, religious freedom, or exchanging and merchant opportunities, the colonist in both regions were searching for another land in the New World.
Plymouth was established by the Pilgrims, who were very conservative. Massachusetts was established by the Puritans who did not want to separate from the church, but rather reform the church. The Puritans also wanted religious freedom for themselves and no one
This was mostly because of the conflicts between the Jamestown settlers and the Indians. There was also a need to help the planters because of the
Jamestown and Plymouth were the first two successful English on the north side. In this essay will be talking about Jamestown and Plymouth, the ones that made history. That’s why we are talking about them right now or any day. Jamestown was established in 1607 and Plymouth in 1620. These two colonies were different, yet had a number striking similarities in government's, reasons for settlements, and differing economic activities.
Coming from the same domicile. Living amongst each other trying to decide how can they remain neighbors and still live comfortable. Unfortunately the Pilgrims and Puritans couldn’t come up with the solution to the problem. Having to deal with the same oppression together by King James and his followers should have brought them closer but instead the pilgrims and puritans had their old engender. Both wanted to seek freedom.