On january 23rd , at o2r about 0325 hours at the location of 2817 Van Buren street #Apartment 4, ( crime location) which is located within the jurisdictional limits of the city of hollywood, within broward county and the state of florida the above named defendant did commit a battery upon the victim herein identified as ASA Curry. Brigett Kelly did intentionally touch/strike Curry coats against his will to wit; Biting Curry on his left breast and scratching him multiple times on his stomach. Brigett Kelly intentionally caused bodily harm to Asa curry. It should be noted that both Kelly and brigett share a children in common, due to having a past romantic relationship. On the above date and time i responded to the above location in reference …show more content…
He then heard a loud knock at his residence, at which point he open the door, and noticed it was his ex-girlfriend, brigett kelly, herien after reffered to as the arrestee. The victim advised that when open, the arrestee started to scream and yell due to not pick up his child early in the day. The victim stated that while the verbal altercation ensued, johniqua miller exited the bedroom due to all the commotion. The arrestee immediately noticed miller and became aggressive and proceeded to charge at miller. A physical altercation between miller and the arrestee ensued. The victim attempted to break it up, but this made the arrestee even more infuriated. The arrestee then took her aggression on the victim and proceeded to take a bite at the victim. The arrestee’s teeth made contact with the victims lower left breast, which resulted with a minor laceration. The victim attempted to push the arrestee away but she then started to scratch at the victims, the scratches made with the victims stomach. At that moment the victim, yelled at the arrestee that he would be calling the police. This resulted with the arrestee running out side and screaming at the victim, stating she would call the police as
Police got a warrant to search the house where the call was originated. This robber admitted to being
Case Name: U.S. ex rel. Cannon v. Smith Case Citation: 388 F. Supp. 1201 (W.D.N.Y. 1975) Procedural History: State prisoner filed pro se application for writ of habeas corpus to secure his release from imprisonment for rape. The U.S. District Court for the Western Division of New York denied his request and he appealed. The U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit remanded.
Per the summons and complaint, plaintiff claims assault and false arrest. Plaintiff claims that defendant PO Argelis Rodriguez and other MOS stopped him and accused him of throwing away a handgun. Plaintiff states that he did not possess a handgun. Plaintiff claims that PO Rodriguez assaulted him in the head, body, face and buttock. Plaintiff alleges that he was placed in handcuffs then his pants and underpants were removed and he was searched on the ground in public
3. Rules of Law 3.1. Restatement (Second) of Torts&21(1965): “Assault is done when someone intends to cause a harmful or offensive contact with another person or if there is any imminent apprehension of a contact”. 3.2. W.Prosser&J. Keaton, Prosser and Keaton on Torts 10 (5th ed.1984): “ Doing and shaking a fist under someone’s nose, to aim or strike at him with a weapon, or to hold the weapon in a threatening position, to raise or advance to strike someone, to surround him with force, is considered as an assault.”
Procedural History: Goetz, defendant, was indicted by a Grand Jury on January 25 1985, for criminal possession of a weapon in third degree, possession the gun during the shooting, two counts for fourth degree criminal possession of a weapon, and possession of two other weapons. The Grand Jury also indicted him for attempt to the following, murder, reckless endangerment, and assault. He was dismissed for the charges of attempted murder and those that came from the shooting. On March 27, 1985, a second Grand Jury indicted the defendant for four charges for attempted murder, four charges of assault in first degree, one for reckless endangerment, and one for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree on the grounds that new evidence became
Based on my investigation, physical evidence, and sworn statements from the victims and witnesses, the defendant Ashlee Pridgen, did commit the act of burglary, grand theft, dealing in stolen property, and False Pawn verification on 5-13-2016 and 5-17-2016. The details of these events are; On or about 5-13-2016, the defendant Ashlee Pridgen was at 1803 Laurel Oak Drive, Rockledge, Florida. Defendant was visiting a friend, Kayleigh Chase, at this residence. While inside the residence, defendant did actually and intentionally enter victim, Stephanie Chase, bedroom where defendant did not have permission to enter and took multiple women’s rings from a jewelry box.
Suspect Pedersen was identified by her own admission. The victim has been recovering from a recent surgery for an aneurysm. Suspect Pedersen hit the victim across the head with a two liter bottle of soda, which was two thirds full. The victim became light headed and the assault caused her wound to open and began bleeding. The victim was transported to Huntington Memorial Hospital for her injuries.
On 05/06/17, at 11:43am, I Deputy Warden N. Christian was dispatched to 523 S Wayne Ave on a dog on dog or cat attack, no known owner. I arrived at the location and was met by Columbus Division of Police (CPD) and complainant Raquel Fuentes. I asked what happened; Ms. Fuentes stated that she was taken part in a community event by assisting with neighborhood clean-up with her dog (small white terrier) when a brown/white Pit Bull came out of nowhere and proceeded to attack her dog. With the assistance of passerby they were able to get the brown/white Pit Bull away from Ms. Fuentes dog.
The case of the State v Rusk involved the defendant Edward Rusk being convicted of 2nd degree rape. There was controversy as to if the defendant actually committed the act of rape due to the circumstances. The case involves a female named Pat. She decides to meet up one night with her friend Terry and go bar hopping.
INTRODUCTION: This incident involved the male suspect strangling the female victim with both hands; the victim and suspect are married and live together, in violation of PC 273.5-Domestic Battery. LOCATION DESRIPTION: The incident occurred in the master bedroom, the residence shared by the victim and suspect located at 920 Seco Street. INJURIES: Victim Gilbert • Sustained redness to her throat.
12- 19- 2014 somewhere around 2400 and 0600 hours I Det. Scott Demeester was dispatched to 1710 Madrona Street. I was called in to investigate a homicide case. The victim was discovered tucked under a sheet in a vacant home in Atlanta Georgia.
Procedural History: The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District (2017) rejected the appellee (Jeffery Malken) claims of stalking against the appellant (Aaron Carter) on a procedural basis. Facts: Siblings’ discord over their mother’s will and the disposition of property centered around this court case. The appellee claimed that his mother’s property was quick claimed to him in 2002. The appellee testified that his sister and her significant other harassed and physically assaulted him.
Yasmin Hassan DUE WEEK OF SEPT 22. POLSC 110 Prof. Newton FEDERALISM Logic of American Politics: “Federalism” 1. Explain the Supreme Court’s decisions in McCulloch v. Maryland and Gibbons v. Ogden and what these decisions would mean for federal-state relations. How would these early cases enable an expanded role for the national government years after these cases were heard?
Title: Schneckloth v. Bustamonte Date/Court: The United States Supreme Court, 1973 Facts: This case deals with Clyde Bustamonte, who tried to defraud a check. At 2:40 a.m. local Sunnyvale Police Officer James Rand stopped a vehicle that had a burnt out headlight and license plate light. When Officer Rand approached the vehicle he found that the individuals Joe Alcala, Bustamonte, and Joe Gonzales were in the front seat. In the rear of the vehicle Officer Rand saw three older gentlemen, Officer Rand then asked the driver if he had identification and the driver (Gonzales) did not have any. Rand then asked the other individuals in the car and only Alcala had a valid license, after producing his license Alcala told the officer that the car was his brothers.
The 14th Amendment right to equal protection as recognized under Baker v Carr designed on the surface to ensure fair participation in the democratic process, however, it is more so a check on the majority. As Baker v Carr introduces, the 14th Amendment does not cover all types of discrimination. For example, discrimination by the means of improper districting of a state, intentional or not, is not covered by the Constitution. However, what the 14th Amendment does do effectively is put a check on the majority will through rights. The majority rules and the only way to prevent this is through rights, which dictate what people are and are not allowed to do.