Throughout America’s history there has been a clear struggle between the beliefs of the individual versus those of society. The literary works of Arthur Miller, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and John Winthrop all explore the importance of conformity in America. The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, traces the consequences of hysteria invading a community in the form of witch accusations in the village of Salem. In The Minister’s Black Veil, written by Nathaniel Hawthorne, the reader sees how the minister’s black veil results in the society’s isolation of him. Finally, A Model of Christian Charity, a speech by John Winthrop, champions religion playing the central role in a community. These literary works all confront the consequences of mimicking the …show more content…
The Crucible reveals that a uniform society will immediately turn on itself when faced with a threat. However, A Mode of Christian Charity advocates for a single way of living because it supposedly brings a society together. John Winthrop intends people to use conformity in order to bind people together making a stronger community. Winthrop argues, “to provide for our prosperity is to followe the counsell of Micah,”(Winthrop, 1-2). Since the word Micah refers to a prophet in the Bible, Winthrop believes that religion knits a group together and leads to well-being in a community. Even though conforming through religion is very specific, Winthrops’ positive attitude towards conformity the reader to believe conformity is a fail-safe conduct and persuades the reader prosperity naturally follows alikeness. On the contrary, Arthur Miller argues that unity is insincere when built upon conformity. When witch accusations explode around the extremely religious town of Salem, Cheever betrays Proctor in order to take away his credibility in court. Cheever points out that Proctor, “plow on Sunday,”(Miller 3, 223). This seemingly insignificant detail actually shows how important religious expectations were in Salem because the people …show more content…
Although A Model of Christian Charity argues conformity leads to prosperity in a community, The Crucible and The Minister’s Black Veil urge people to avoid taking after society because strict enforcement of identical ideals results in ignorance and an inability to understand one another. The Minister’s Black Veil most effectively questions the significance of conformity because people in today’s world see their own society perfectly reflected in the social standards of town of Milford. The story starts off with, “spruced bachelors looked sidelong at pretty maidens, and fancied that the Sabbath sunshine made them prettier.” Hawthorne elaborates on how town of Milborn uses the Sabbath as a social event in order to also reveal the emphasis the town puts on materialistic and physical values. This parallels with today’s world because Americans outwardly say that what is on the inside matters while at the same time promoting models in order to define one’s worth. Since The Minister’s Black Veil closely resembles today’s world, readers understand at a deeper level the literary work’s overall meaning which holds that conformity hurts society’s ability to reason and adapt to new circumstances. If the reader realizes how dangerous conformity can be, then they will make a much needed effort to accept and actively learn to
The Puritans arrived in America in the 16th and 17th centuries hoping create a purified version of the church as they believed the Church of England had still had too many components of catholicism. Humans are also invertly evil and this wickedness is displayed throughout many stories. Finally, moral values are also a central conflict to many stories. Puritanism, the evils of all humans, and moral conflict are a central themes to all three of The Crucible, “Young Goodman Brown”, and “The Minister’s Black Veil”. Although these stories are seemingly unrelated stories on the surface however when considering the under-the-surface meanings of these stories many similarities appear including the impact of Puritanism, the wickedness of all humans, and moral conflict.
In the Crucible by Arthur Miller, a prominent conflict that ensues is the community versus power seekers. The story takes place at a time when people are living in a very closely knit community based on Puritan principles, and, consequently, prone to intolerance towards opposition or dissent. Not to mention, the whole town is involved, not simply one family whose drama might be representative of the plight of the community. In addition, such a rigid society implies that any form of individuality is considered dangerous. With a society this controlling, community members are more likely to act out and pursue personal interests.
In 1692, the year of the witch hunt in Salem, Massachusetts, fright, and vengeance were among the people. The people being an unforgiving group of people during the time were more prone to causing conflict than they were resolving it. In the historical fiction “The Crucible,” by Arthur Miller, many conflicts prevail in the plot of the story. Some of the many conflicts include Elizabeth Proctor and Abigail Williams, John Proctor and Reverend Parris, and Reverend Parris versus society. John Proctor has a burning dislike for Reverend Parris, for he won’t even let him baptize his last son.
The world is full of standards. There are standards for math, standards for science, and social standards as well. Standards keep the world intact and provide different expectations for people all around the world. However, through society’s standards, people hold personal standards for themselves and others around them. In The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, each character differs from one another in their viewpoints concerning their social and religious standards in their puritan environment.
Intolerant societies, poor leadership, and conformity are three themes that run through A Brief History of the Salem Witch Trials by Jess Blumberg, Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut, and The Lottery by Shirley Jackson. The three works reflect the destructive impact of social norms when they are imposed without reason, ruthlessly enforced, or blindly accepted. This synthesis essay will explore these themes in greater detail, drawing on key quotes and incidents from each text to illustrate the dangers inherent in conformity and intolerant behavior. Intolerance is a dominant theme in A Brief History of the Salem Witch Trials by Jess Blumberg. Despite the lack of evidence against the accused individuals, the residents of Salem were quick to condemn
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, which is an embellished and somewhat novelized story of the Salem witch trials of 1692, offers the audience a protagonist, John Proctor, who is defined by the struggles that worry him. Where a strict theocracy rules Salem, the bible is the law, and all who do not follow the rules entirely are serving the devil, John Proctor portrays the classic tragic hero, where his moral errors and sacrifice for his morals becomes the cause of his untimely death. At the cost of his principles, he underwent a major survey of his character, which leads him to understand that the only way to redeem himself for his moral sins was to sacrifice his life. Proctor’s principal value is his sense of personal integrity, and this places him into a direct, and ultimately dreadful confrontation with the court set up to test the accusations of witchcraft.
From Witches in 1692 to Muslims in 2001 Arthur Miller in the play, The Crucible, suggests that people of society create a separation between outsiders and insiders of the town, often prosecuting the outsiders to make them stand out even more from society. Miller supports his claim by describing how the young girls of Salem blame the outsiders of their town of witchcraft. The author’s purpose is to point out that falsely accusing outsiders will not have a good outcome in order to convince the reader to not divide society. The author writes in a satiric tone to mock the McCarthyism era of communism.
Human is a species that live in group, and conformity is one of the distinct characteristic of human nature. In the play The Crucible, Arthur Miller investigates various natures in community throughout Act 1 and 2. The play took place at Salem, a town that primarily based on puritanism, the major plot of this play is about witchcraft and witch hunt. Miller conveys a essential message of people always search for conformity from society as a form to prove their identity, further, any rebellion would consider as outcast from majority. The author explores the theme by the use of conflict, this literary element best demonstrates changes of characterizations and complication between others and internal struggle.
In Salem, Massachusetts, the witch trials of 1692 revealed the town’s masquerade, leaving nothing but the truth. Arthur Miller utilized this event to confront the idea of conformity in American culture, as well as ideas of justice and principle. Each of the characters in The Crucible, through their personal struggles, further discloses the nature of humans and social structure. Miller has the ability to dissect the causes of such moral conflicts using their motives, actions, and individual pressures, which still remain relevant in modern-day constructs such as American politics. To begin, as one of the prominent characters throughout the story, Reverend Hale’s conflicts are initiated by his personal commitment to God.
Hypocrisy plagues the pages of Arthur Miller’s The Crucible and Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter as a result of the Puritans deceitful and conforming ways. Trials and rumors bring out the worst of the Puritans in The Crucible. While, in The Scarlet Letter, scandal and humiliation overcast the so called holiness of the Puritans. In the Puritan society, pride and selfishness would bring out one’s hypocritical ways if their reputation was at stake.
Religions have a hand in completely blinding communities. In fact, some communities have completely changed their morals, to better accommodate to that of their chosen religious belief. As such, these communities have trouble in differentiating between being reasonable, and of, being unreasonable. Bringing this farther into confrontation is that of Arthur Miller’s The Crucible. Through that of his characters, Miller expresses ignorance, and of how, it can make a group go against rational thinking, thus, eventually causing the death, and or pain, of others as a result.
Most communities in the world today believe that excluding harmful thoughts, ideas, actions, and sometimes people are ultimately the best course of action for uniting their group. An example is the exclusion of same-sex marriage in most states, but especially in the Catholic Church. By excluding same-sex marriage, the Catholic Church community unites with a feeling of purity towards their religious community. In the play, The Crucible, Arthur Miller presents the audience with a paradox that was exemplified through the Salem witchcraft trials. The paradox “Unity through Exclusion” means that a community will become closer together through the exclusion or exile of harmful people.
In The Crucible, Arthur Miller argues that conformity and fear can cause human nature to make a mess of things very quickly. The characters of his play live in an unchecked Puritanical theocracy that is very strict and the courts cannot be challenged or questioned. This and the power of fear causes all the townsfolk to act in a vindictive way that they normally wouldn’t have. The Salem Witch Trials are far from the only example in history of human’s pack nature causing chaos. Many prominent conformity events in history have been during times of war and confusion.
It is commonly accepted that the acts of witch hunts and demonization of people for slightly out of place behavior or actions that took place well over two hundred years ago was appalling and socially detesteable. Yet at the same time, it is also more commonly known that history repeats itself in a vicious cycle. Acts of brutality and social ostracization similar to the witch hunts of the distant past have been seen as recent as the 20th century. In Arthur Miller’s acclaimed play, The Crucible, many instances of conflict, public revolt, and morbid consequences for insignificant occurrences, titles, and accusations. Miller’s work not only made social commentary on society’s behavior within the Puritan town of Salem, Massachusetts during 1692,
In a setting of Salem, Massachusetts 1692, religion is the direct reflection of one's social standing. Reputation is extremely important for the town, as it is your only way to get a fair hearing and respect from the people. The protectiveness of reputation is necessary in The Crucible to justify yourself when presented with fallacious arguments. In this play the importance of reputation is revealed though the uses of ethos, logos and pathos. The protectiveness of reputation is uncovered through various characters such as Reverend Hale, Reverend Parris, and John Proctor.