INTRODUCTION
Marital rape can be defined as any unwanted intercourse or penetration (vaginal, anal or oral) obtained by force, threat of force, or when the wife is unable to consent. In India the usual perception is that a man cannot be accused of rape while availing his conjugal rights, for a woman is his duty bound subservient and more so such cases are often kept a secret behind closed doors. There are usually three types of rapes prevalent in the society being battering rape, force on rape and obsessive rape.
More than half the world’s countries do not explicitly criminalise marital rape or have lesser penal penalties as compared to other forms of rape. The human rights violation are inherently prevalent and dominant as violence against
…show more content…
This further introduced a notion amongst the masses of ‘implied consent’ which was not supported with any judicial argument. The credos of marital rape exemption are thus based on the notion of ‘irrevocable implied consent’.
INDIAN LAW ON MARITAL RAPE- A BRIEF
In India, rape exists de facto but not de jure. Rape is defined under Section 375 of IPC and as per the code the only instances where a husband can be criminally prosecuted for the offence of marital rape are if wife is between 12-15 years of age, when wife is below 12 years of age, when judicially separated and rape of wife above 15 years in age is not a punishable offence. Further under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act,2005, it only forms basis for judicial separation but criminal liability.
Under the Indian constitution , exemption of rape fails to conform with the provisions of Article 14 and Article 21.
MARITAL RAPE – A GROSS VIOLATION TO HUMAN RIGHTS OF
…show more content…
There is a dire need for the change in laws on marital rape and criminalising it. The punishment for marital rape should be the same as prescribed for rape under section 376 of IPC. Although most Indian women feel protected under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, still there are many loopholes in it for it doesn’t include marital rape. The only entitlements a wife has under the law, is to bring action for criminal assault, inquiry or matrimonial relief but no liability is cast by law for marital rape, which needs to be recognised to protect the dignity of the women in our country being a fundamental
The force necessary to support a conviction of rape need only be such as to establish lack of consent and to induce the victim to submit without additional resistance. The degree of force required to constitute rape is relative and depends on the facts and particular circumstance of the
It is evident with how the government as well as the people ignores the rights of other
Many words come up when thinking of ‘College’, some of which are: learning, independence, goals, party, and freedom; although, that’s not always the case. At residential colleges rape culture has grown tremendously throughout time. In the article, “Mishandling Rape”, written by Jed Rubenfeld completely analyzes and supports the problem of rape in colleges throughout the United States. In this article, he establishes the importance of his argument, the audience he is hoping to speak out to, various logistics, and has a strong ethos appeal which supports his argument.
In this and the last century our Human Rights issues, no matter the issue, all follow the same pattern. As these go throughout time, with racial and gender equality in the past showing similarities, and issues of today following suit. Also, the many genocides throughout time also follow a pattern, too. In the past, we had hot button issues of racial equality, gender equality, “underground” issues, and equality in general.
To many, violation of human rights is a serious issue. This shows that for every negative force, there is always someone who recognizes the wrong and seeks to correct
Misconceptions can lead to affected perceptions of consent towards sexual activity. A common misconception is that majority of sexual assault victims are not known to their offender. A survey done in 2021 by the ABS shows that 83% of sexual assault victims within that year knew their offender, this dispels the misconception of the common rape scenario of stranger danger and instead provides an insight that victims knew the perpetrator prior to the offence. Another misconception is that women cannot be sexually assaulted by their spouse, though this may be historically accurate under common law, the Crimes (Sexual Assault) Amendment Act 1981 later criminalised the martial rape immunity. A misunderstanding related to consent is that lack of physical or verbal resistance is an indication of consent.
Half the Sky by Nicholas D. Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn discusses women’s issues around the world, specifically focusing on sex trafficking, violence against women, and female mortality. While this book covers many issues on a global scale, everything relates back to a single central argument: that women are not treated like humans in the “third world.” The authors argue that because women are seen as subhuman in many places, they and their issues are invisible to much of the world. When women are not treated with common humanity, they are subjected to innumerable cruelties. These cruelties towards women that are explored throughout the book are accepted for the same reasons that brutalizing slaves was accepted; the victims are not human and
Jeremiahs ' mother deceased and was cared for by his grandmother who is now deceased. The court gave custody to the aunt (Latanya), but she has not been living in the home. Latanya lives in Jackson, MS, with her boyfriend, and is employed in Vicksburg, MS. Latanya would visit the home in Vicksburg daily. Jeremiah is being whooped by the other aunt (LaShonda) with an extension cord and anything else.
When questioned about rape, especially most women, they might think or even picture a stranger coming out of a dark place to assault someone. But in reality there’s more to it. According to the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, “About half of all people who are raped know the person who attacked them. This is known as date rape — forced sex that can happen not only on a date, but also somewhere like a party with someone the victim may know, like, or even be interested in.” Furthermore, social critic and feminist, Camille Paglia, has been discussing this persisting issue about date rape with a personal stance that many women may disagree with.
Consent can either always be recognised, never recognised or sometimes be recognised as a ground of justification. Consent always recognised is where if consent is given the accused can never be charged with that crime. The law should reflect the victim’s choice to consent as a legitimate excuse of individual autonomy. For example, property crimes with consent will not result in theft or malicious damage to property. Consent that is never recognised as defence is identified as ‘paternalism’.
There is to many violence opportunities in this country. There are different levels of violence such as murder, assault/battery, robbery a theft combined with the use of force, various types of homicides, including murder and manslaughter, kidnapping, armed robbery, and sexual assault crimes. Though there is sub groups to the sexcual assult crimes. Such as rape, consensual rape, sexual battery or criminal sexual penetration. Though the main difference is the consent aspect of it.
The appellant had intercourse with the complainant. The issue raised in this case is did the complainant consent to the sexual intercourse. The appellant did not consider whether she consented and proceeded with it anyway. In the judgment of R v Tolmie , when Kirby P was defining inadvertent recklessness, he referred to the statements in DPP v Morgan and
Sexual assault laws have been amended and created over time to ensure the criminal justice system remains sensitive to the tribulations involved in rape trials for the victim. However, the connotative capacity of language used in evidentiary testimonies in rape trials can defeat the purpose of these reforms as ‘language is not merely a means of putting forth evidence in a case, but it in fact transforms the nature of evidence itself, thus influencing the outcome of the case’ (Maheshwari 2014:1). As theorised by Bourdieu (1982) symbolic power as ‘the power to create reality through language’ (Matoesian 1995:38) is successfully employed in rape trials to instil patriarchal and legal domination over the victim. The use of language in courtroom
In efforts to completely eradicate child marriages within its society, the Government of India enacted the 'Prevention of Child marriage Act 2006 ', which replaced the earlier legislation of 'Child Marriage Restraint Act 1929. ' This new Act is makes it possible to prohibit for child marriage, protect and provide relief to victim and enhance punishment for those who promote or are invovled in such marriage. This Act also calls upon the need to appoint 'Child Marriage Prohibition Officers ' to implement this act. South Asia Initiative to End Violence Against