Confronting Inequality Summary

The Democrats believe there should be only cuts for middle and low-income families, but believe they should be taxed at a higher rate on corporations and wealthy individuals. The Republicans believe there should be tax cuts for everyone, both corporations and people of all income levels. “The Republicans passed the Bankruptcy Bill favoring credit card businesses over Americans whose budgets are destroyed by job loss or medical bills” (Freeman 329). In their turn, the Democrats have passed the Welfare Reform Act, cutting benefits for the poorest layers of the American population. Republicans and Democrats have very different ideas where it comes to the business environment.

He states by having so many of them taking up the low-skilled working jobs in America they are actually creating an increase in wage inequality. He states that by decreasing the numbers of low-skilled workers in America that it would actually reduce the wage inequality and strengthen the wages for people in those

(reduces economic gap between social classes). People would become richer but it’s at the expense of the government becoming poorer. The government will have to take out more loans and have more debt. Cons: USFG shouldn’t pay reparations to African Americans Cost America pay they don’t have As we speak, America’s debt is at 18.2 trillion dollars and rising. If we pay every slave minimum wage for their work, we would have to pay trillions of dollars.

Normally developing countries providing free education & healthcare for the citizens, so the citizens need to provide some value to the country after getting their education freely. So the migration of those skill labours from home country to foreign country may lead to provide very less profit to the country compare with the investment on education & healthcare . Business :- The labour drain may lead to have very less skilled labours remain within the country & their demand will be very high. So the local business mostly not be able to afford the cost of skilled labours & it may case to decrease the business productivity & innovations within the local business. 5.4 Uncertainty Country :- When one country is depending on another country regarding some kind of service or good , when the independent country get some issue to provide the service or produce goods, it will directly impact the depending country economy.

While it is reasonable to only increase minimum wage for those who work full-time, most that work full-time are already getting paid above $7.25 an hour. At the same time, the cost of living is likely to increase for all. Furthermore, I have personally seen that many who work minimum wage jobs made the conscious decision to drop out of school or take the easier route and earn a GED. Although I disagree with much of what Perkins states, I agree with Perkins claim that raising minimum wage might motivate people to stop abusing the welfare

But yeah it is nice to have extra money by raising minimum wage but it is going to be the same thing overall, if not worse the bills are going to go up with it. Raising minimum wage could reduce the benefits you get such as insurance, vacation, and your future. Raising it as well means what about all the people that already have their worked their way to what the minimum wage wants to be set at. Do they expect them to stay at that same wage or go up as much as minimum wage raised. It is hard to raise the minimum wage therefore it shouldn 't.

Paul Krugmam, a teacher of economics at Princeton and the city University of New York, uses people who have had an impact on America. They all make decent points towards income inequality, and inequality as a whole. Becker and Murphy believe that if a higher education will give you a higher income, although education after high school is expensive, the returns are worth it. Even though statistics prove that Becker and Murphy's theory is correct, Krugman believes that the living standards are important and shouldne be jepordized, because of an education. Paul Krugman in “Confronting Inequality” attempts to explain how bad inequality is and the things that can bring inequality to high or low levels.

The main “common sense” argument is that by imposing minimum wages, one artificially raises the price of labour way from its “market-clearing” level and higher unemployment results-and the first to lose their jobs will be the least-skilled workers (city press;2014/11/25). The national minimum wage is a step towards an alternative growth path, in other words wages must be set to target productivity and efficiency. But it must be accompanied by other alternatives; such as industrial policy that sees that South Africa create jobs in sectors that can sustain moderately higher wages, and grow sectors that can benefit from, and contribute to, increased domestic demand (city press;2014/11/25). However national minimum wages promote equality, combat poverty and support economic development e.g. in Brazil during Lula’s tenure as president, the statutory minimum wage rose

That is the heart of the liberal perspective on increasing the minimum wage and paying employees more will not just help workers but business owners and the population at large. This is so for several reasons. First, paying workers a higher salary is going to increase the productivity of the workers. This increased productivity and improved customer service will generate more in revenue than the increase in wages. Secondly, the reduction

Aslo why should our money be going to foreign countries? I get that were trying to help and make them better but it 's only making our country worse. We should focus on making America better and smarter and get our own people in thousands of dollars in debt and also off the streetings. College tuition should be free for all U.S citizens because it shouldn 't be an obstacle to get a higher education that would make our nation more efficient and smarter that would also help our economy grow with more jobs and people having more money to contribute back into