Cox And Mccubbins Analysis

In this paper I will argue that two crucial aspects of the US Constitution, equal membership in the Senate and the presidential veto, have created undemocratic institutions and consequences such as 1) a ‘democratically’ unbalanced distribution of power and resources in the Senate and 2) an excessive exercise of presidential power. Henceforth, I’m not asserting that the constitution as a whole is undemocratic; rather, I’m arguing that both Senate representation and the presidential veto have contributed to the creation of a dysfunctional political system and legislative process. Whereas composition in the Senate is a structural constitutional weakness, the presidential veto is not so much a structural flaw than it is a political one, which has

In my opinion I do not feel that it is justification for bypassing Congress. Just because he is the President should not mean because he doesn’t like the way things are going he can just bypass them all. I kind of feel like that is a huge reason why things in our country are they way that they are. The president doesn’t care about what anyone else has to say only what he thinks is right. Unlike many other politicians or interest groups, the president does not have to work hard to receive media coverage.

Electoral College., n.d.). The Office of the Federal Register works as a mediator for the governors and secretaries of condition of the States and the Congress. Additionally, it proceeds as trusted operators of the Congress, in charge of looking into the legitimate adequacy of the declarations before the House and Senate acknowledge them as proof of authority State activity (U.S. Electoral College., n.d.). The people of each state vote for the electors who then cast their votes on the people’s behalf. “As the 2000 election reminded us, the Electoral College does make it possible for a candidate to win the popular vote and still not become president” (Miller, J., 2008, February 11), yet that is less a result of the Electoral College and more a result of the way states allocate balloters.

He mapped out what he wanted in a good government to be. What Jefferson wrote in the declaration of independence was not supported by the dreams of the new Constitution. The constitution did not support the style of government talked about by T.J. because for one, there wasn 't much room for the power of the people to change their government if they see fit. Secondly it did not give the citizens of the U.S. clear, mapped out “unalienable rights”. Lastly the Constitution did not provide guards for citizens future security in the government as laid out by T.J. in the

In Federalist Paper #51, James Madison decided to describe the structure that the government would apply to make liberty available. In James Madison’s mind, each branch should be independent and not dependent. I believe that Madison is saying that not one branch should depend on the other two branches no matter what the situation is. In terms of the branches, not one branch should have too much power in selecting members for the other two branches. For example, if the legislative branch had a lot of power in selecting the members of the judicial branch then they could corrupt the judicial branch to be useless.

On a more serious note, presidents can address the issues that would interfere with the Constitution yet still sign the law that would give the benefits to where it is needed. Signing statements are an efficient way to provide for the country yet still

The two-party system is an essential part of our national government because if “[reinforces] the constitutional framework within which the voter may without peril exercise his freedom of political choice” (pg. 178). Just as the essay, “Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System” emphasized the importance of maintain a two-party

Our own nation experienced a civil war due to disagreements over government and the role it plays over its citizens. This debate has been present since the formation of our government and can be considered the motive behind the formation of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. A government is a governing body of a nation or state. How far does this governing body’s power extend is where the debate begins. It is my belief that a government should protect the rights and freedoms of its people through laws and legislature created for and voted on by its citizens.

At the point, I wonder when we will truly have the ability to choose our national leader. By picking our president entirely in light of who the majority of our masses picks, without the wire of the Electoral College, the vote of each American would hold measure up to weight and hugeness. Under the new framework, when we vote in favor of the president we would genuinely be voting in favor of the president, rather than “teaching” our electors on how we oblige them to vote. It legitimizes considering that it may be a flawless opportunity to scratch off the Electoral College and depend totally on a nationally commended vote to pick our president. With the Electoral College, the voting force of the comprehensive group has been crippled and unequally appropriated over our country.

It is arguable whether or not electoral college is relevant or not to our society. While many may argue that this system is not convenient, from my perspective it is. There are several statements from the article The Electoral College is an Excellent System by George F. Will that lead me to believe that the electoral college is most suitable for our present life. The electoral college system the most appropriate way of electing the President. Electoral college is convenient in several ways.

With this immense amount of power comes extreme limitations which can sometimes severely hamper the effectives of a presidential term. Unlike the misconstrued widely held belief of most Americans the President is not able to single handily reshape the economy, engage in military conflicts, or dictate the pace of legislature. In terms of passing new legislature or economic reform the president

I concede that the Constitution does not provide for citizens directly impeaching

But, he was wrong. Congress is permitted to “make all laws which shall be necessary and proper” to carry out other powers that is specifically granted. The national bank was something to look forward to because it would keep the nation’s money organized and under

Formation of policy occurs in Congress, while implementation of policy at the federal level occurs through the executive bureaucracy. This formation and implementation are not without struggles between the executive branch and Congress, yet, interest groups with a stake in the policy also seek to influence the policy process. Scholars highlight arguments as to who controls and influences the bureaucracy the executive, legislative, or pluralistic interest groups. No matter who influences the bureaucracy, under the current conditions of party polarization and greater hyper-pluralism there is greater contentiousness in the policy process and a decreasing ability for government policies to be flexible for meeting current policy problems.

For example, the legislative powers are given to congress the executive powers are given to the president and the judicial powers are in the hands of the supreme court. Thus, separating powers helps control the government. So, by separating the amount of power throughout the government, it protects tyranny happenings in the