ipl-logo

Source Of Faction

519 Words3 Pages

1. What does Madison mean by faction and why might he have called them a "necessary evil" in a free society? Madison mean by faction are group of people that are not given the same equal freedom or same chances in living or doing their own things. Madison called them necessary evil because of without a balance and just government the society will fall. As the result, with a just and balance with equal divisions can make everything seem more functional and people will agree upon. 2. What does Madison see as the most "enduring source of faction"? Madison see the most enduring source of faction would be the unequal distribution of property. The idea without equal distribution of property will lead to monarchy and people being more authoritarian. …show more content…

4. What are the two elements of republicanism that Madison suggests will help cure the problem of faction. The two elements of republicanism that Madison suggest will help cure the problem of factions are "first, the delegation of the government, in the latter, to a small number of citizens elected by the rest; secondly, the greater number of citizens, and greater sphere of country, over which the latter may be extended." These two things help makes the government better by introducing the number of people electing a person to represent and more people that are citizens enlarge the country. 5. Why does he think the delegation of power to a small group of elected representatives is a good idea? Madison thought that delegation of power to a small group of elected representatives is a good idea due to having distinctive parties and having small majority. In having these things people will not be about to get rid of plans. Plans that are made by the government within the small

Show More
Related
403 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout Federalist 10 Madison addresses the issue of political factions, or parties, and how they are a problem, and how to deal with them. Madison describes factions as like minded people who come together to impose their views on others. The first method Madison proposes is to remove the causes that make the faction, and the second being by controlling its effects. In order to do those things Madison says that we must destroy liberty, and give everyone the same opinions, passions and the interests respectfully. Neither of these ideas would work however because if you destroy liberty just because it gives rise to factions, you would be destroying something that is good just because it has a small side effect that can be seen as

Read More
2239 Words | 9 Pages

James Madison addressed other delegates by saying: “But I go on this great republican principle, that the people will have virtue and intelligence to select men of virtue and wisdom. Is there no virtue among us? If there be not, we are in a wretched situation. No theoretical checks--no form of government can render us secure. To suppose that any form of government will secure liberty or happiness without any virtue in the people, is a chimerical idea.

Read More
998 Words | 4 Pages

After establishing each branch and determining its purpose, his goal was to arrange them in a way that they would be able to limit and have appropriate constitutional control over each other. By doing so, he was able to prevent one branch from following through with a plan without approval from the remaining branches of government. "... (The three branches) should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other." (James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, 1788). In this quote, James Madison is basically stating the that each branch should be limited by as well as have constitutional control over the other two branches.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

1.) What does Madison mean by the term “Faction”? What is a modern term we would use today? Madison uses the term faction to refer to groups of individuals arguing not for the rights or good of the community as a whole, but rather that which would benefit those who hold similar positions or interests. Different factions represent different ideas, leading to conflict and debate.

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

1. In Federalist Paper 10, Madison expressed concerns about factions and his desire to protect the minority (people with land) from the majority (those without). He stated that a large republic should be created so that tiny factions interest groups will have a difficult time uniting and becoming a majority that usurps the minority. Do you think this theory has withstood the test of time? Discuss instances in which it has/has not.

Read More
1861 Words | 8 Pages

In the tenth paragraph he states “The inference to which we are brought is, the causes of faction cannot be removed, and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its effects ("The Federalist #10").” This is important because Madison stated previously that removing the causes would not work, so what we are left with is to be able to control the effects, which is much more manageable. In paragraph 11 Madison states “If a faction consists of less than a majority, relief is supplied by the republican principle, which enables the majority to defeat its sinister views by regular vote ("The Federalist #10").” This is true because when you have a large number of smaller factions that are spread out across the country, the majority influence keeps the minority influence in

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

James Madison’s Federalist 10 was written amid criticisms that a republican form of government had never been successful on a large scale. Madison’s argument was that a well-constructed union could control factions. He argued that in order to control factions from their causes, we would need to either give up liberty or free thought. Since we cannot infringe upon these two natural rights, we must move on to controlling the effects. A republic, Madison argues, would be able to do this because the people choose the representatives, and they choose representatives who they feel best represent their opinions.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

10 in an attempt to ratify the Constitution, the new form of government for the United States. In the Federalist Paper No. 10, Madison analyzed the way to deal with facts, made a comparison between a pure democracy and a republic, and made another comparison on whether a small government or a large government would be the best for America. He informed the people that there is not a way to completely get rid of factions, but there are ways to deal with them. One great way to deal with factions is by having a government that knows how to control and deal with their effects. Madison believes that a republic can do that job better than a democracy, because a democracy is a small society of people who can not admit there is a cure to factions.

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

Madison brings up that it isn’t possible to divide power absolutely equally and “In republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates.” (2). And so, the legislative branch will be divided even more to try and combat the unbalance of power. Madison thought this system was a good method because he believed that it was part of human nature to have conflicting ideas and wants, and so each branch could keep the others in line and therefor no one power is above the others. Furthermore, Madison believes a bigger government with multiple branches is better because then it becomes difficult for one

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

With this quote, Madison describes the Founders’ intent to design a government which could self-balance and obstruct the majority’s monetary impulses. Specifically, the Founders believed that factions, groups of people united by common interests and passions, would quickly assemble and attempt to impose their will on the nation out of self-interest. Consequently, the Founders fashioned the Constitution with in-built roadblocks, separation of powers along with checks and balances, to pit factions against one another to slow down the government’s legislative abilities. For instance, the Founders created two houses within Congress to cause factions from multiple constituencies to check one another. As stipulated by the Constitution, small districts

Read More
203 Words | 1 Pages

James Madison had a very interesting point in which he explained the violence of faction in a government. He considered factions to be unhealthy for democracy so he analyzed the causes and effects of faction, including the unequal distribution of property. Madison points out that when a faction gains power, they use their power to promote their own issues by taking advantage of the minorities. Therefore, he discussed two ways on how to deal with factions such as removing its causes and controlling its effects by destroying liberty and making sure that everyone has the same opinion. But in fact, there is not much we can do about factions because if liberty is destroyed, the whole point of having freedom in a republic would be destroyed as well.

Read More
1081 Words | 5 Pages

Madison and Hamilton both knew that some form of federal government was needed, but Madison was not for one on this scale. The People still remembered what rule under Britain was like, and were hesitant to put themselves back into a situation where history could repeat itself. In the end, the two were able to come to an agreement. The South got to choose the capital’s location, therefore deciding the location of the heart and soul of the country. Both had logical views, but Hamilton was right to try and explain the importance of unity.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

In the case of taxation, the more powerful of the two parties would have the opportunity to impose higher taxes on the minority, thus, saving themselves money. Madison firmly believed that the constitution had the ability to solve the problems created by factions. Madison envisioned a large republic that would make it difficult for corrupt candidates to get elected. Madison expressed this by stating, In the next place, as each representative will be chosen by a greater number of citizens in the large than in the small republic, it will be more difficult for unworthy candidates to practice with success the vicious arts by which elections are too often carried; and the suffrages of the people being more free, will be more likely to centre in men who possess the most attractive merit and the most diffusive and established characters.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

James Madison wrote Federalist 51 over 200 years ago, yet its words still impact today’s government in 2016. When writing Federalist 51, Madison had two main objectives in mind; he wanted a government with a separation of powers, and he also wanted minorities to be protected. Both of his objectives have been accomplished and continue to be present in today’s American government with the latter objective being more present in today’s government even more so than in the past. To begin with, power is separated in today’s government, preventing a single person or group from having absolute power since, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” according to John Dalberg-Acton. The American government is composed of three branches which power is separated amongst.

Read More
1165 Words | 5 Pages

Madison’s arguments all support the same conclusion- that a larger republic is more effective at minimizing the chances of a corrupt representative being elected than a small republic. Madison’s theory of representation, including its flaws, can be illustrated through real-world events, an example of which can be found in the impeachment of the former Brazilian president- Dilma Rousseaff- in 2016. During this time, the country was split, with most of Brazil’s poorest citizens supporting Dilma, and opposing her impeachment because she had raised an astounding number of people out of poverty. On the other hand, wealthy Brazilians who depended on over half the country remaining in poverty, feared the threat to their riches that Dilma presented, and supported her

Read More

More about Source Of Faction

Related Topics

Open Document