Death Penalty Is Wrong Essay

For many years, Australia has debated if they should reintroduce death penalty or not. The year 1967 was the last time when Australia used death penalty as a punishment. There are a total of 22 countries in the world where death penalty is still legal and present and these include countries such as America, China, Afghanistan and North Korea. Despite death penalty still being legal in many countries, it appears that Australia should not re-introduce death penalty. Death penalty should not be legal in Australia since there are other ways to punish a criminal that does not involve death and there never is a humane way to kill an individual. Furthermore, killing another human is unacceptable.

The topic of capital punishment presents a test of values. The arguments in support of and opposition to the death penalty are complex. In the end, this is a question of an individual’s values and morals. The topic requires careful thought to reach a reasoned position. Both sides of the argument are defensible. Support for capital punishment requires valuing retribution over rehabilitation. Those who favor capital punishment value highly the closure it provides to the families of the victims, and they believe that it deters would be murderers from killing. Retribution, closure and deterrence are the main reasons in favor of the death penalty. Opponents of capital punishment generally believe that it is hypocritical and immoral for the state

The death penalty is a sentence that has no use. The process has become too slow over the years to the point where some people die before they get executed. Similar to the case of Max Soffar who may have been innocent, but died of cancer before he had the chance to fight for the freedom he may have deserved(Houston Press). This also shows that the death penalty has taken and ruined the lives of innocent people. A study shows that 4% of defendants sentenced to death penalty are innocent(The Guardian).The second reason is the high number of botched executions that happen in the USA. The only one without failed executions is the most intense one which is the firing squad.

According to Randa (1997), the first established death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C in the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, this codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes. Death penalty is the punishment of execution or took part in someone legally convicted of a capital crime. Although death penalty is the cheapest way to remove criminal from society, death penalty should be banned because it puts innocent life at risk and mentally ill people are executed.

The jury stares at the criminal from across the room. They are coming up with the final verdict that will change the criminal’s life forever. What if you had the power in your hands to decide whether the criminal is going to have a life that will change, or no life at all? Capital punishment has been a political debate for years because people argue whether or not the punishment is humane or if it deters crime. I believe the death penalty should be continued because it deters crime, and serves proper justice for the victims, as well as their families.

Firstly, death teaches the convicted nothing. He who committed the crime is sentenced to death and not given the chance to think through his/her miscarriages of justice. However, a person is never executed immediately, therefore they are given a sufficient amount of time to not only fear their fate but also rethink their actions and misdoings. Notwithstanding, capital punishment, however much feared, won 't necessarily dissuade criminals to continue committing crimes. This may be because the perpetrator is either psychotic and enjoys committing felonies or the offender simply doesn 't fear death. Aside from the fact that capital punishment may be an unfair punishment at times, not only does it gives the culprit no chances for rehabilitation, but can also be a miscarriage of justice; if someone were to be found innocent after having been executed, there 's no way to bring the person back meaning they have been killed because of human error. Sometimes the execution may go wrong and take longer than expected. The problem with killing a criminal is we never know if the methods used today caused him/her pain. If a person deserves to be harshly punished, imprisonment may be the answer. Say a murdering pedophile was incarcerated, considering a vast number of his inmates were abused as children, it isn 't unheard of for them to gang-rape, castrate, stab, beat to death or behead him. It is possible for jailing to be a worse fate than death. Take Zacarias Moussaoui as an example, a member of the 9/11 hijacking teams caught one month before the attack; since 2006 he has been incarcerated in a tiny concrete cell for twenty-three hours a day with only one hour dedicated to exercise in an empty concrete swimming pool. He has no access to his inmates and barely has any contact with his guards. Execution is also viewed as hypocritical. A nation is denouncing murder by committing the same act, making this a question

As you can see from the reality above, capital punishment is inhuman and sadistic. The 8th amendment of the constitution reads no cruel or unusual punishment. “In any case, execution is more than a punishment exacted in retribution for the taking of a life” (ACLU, 7). The definition of the word cruel is willfully causing pain or suffering to others. Extensively, officials are willingly executing the convicted and in some cases where error is present, there is suffering undoubtedly. Hence, a violation of the eighth amendment of the United States constitution is

The process of punishing criminals, who commit crimes against the law, has occurred for centuries. Capital punishment also known as the death penalty is the highest form of punishment the legal system in the United States, can present. The method of Capital punishment in the United States has been in effect for most of the country 's history, without much controversy. However, in today’s society the controversy of whether or not this process is sufficient continues today. Many people throughout America argue this form of punishment to be a hypocritical process, performed by a nation that claims to have liberty and justice for all. The death penalty by numerous people is considered as an insufficient method of punishing criminals. Even though,

The United States is one of very few western nations that still has a death penalty. In life people are taught that violence is not the answer and that murder is a sin. The death penalty goes against everything that people are taught in life. The wrong way to approach a situation is to inflict what someone is accused of upon them. Also the risk of executing an innocent person cannot be completely eliminated. While many people think the death penalty is fair, it is wrong because taking a life for a life is poor judgment, it is a racist punishment, and thinking it is cost effective is not true.

The death penalty is ineffective, because its main purposes are to give some consolation to the victim 's family, and to be a crime deterrent. The main problem with this is that it doesn 't work at all as a crime deterrent. According to “Study: 88% of criminologists do not believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent” in 2008 88.2% of criminologists surveyed did not believe that the death penalty is effective. This is technically proven since states with a death penalty have a higher murder rate then ones without one. Executions might have worked as a deterrent when people were hung publicly, had their heads removed, shot down by firing squad, and even when done using the electric chair. The big problem with all of these is also what made them genuinely effective, the brutality. Now we administer a humane drug cocktail. Nobody cares, sure most people don 't want to die, but most people on death row actually do, because

The death penalty is a cruel and unjust method of serving justice, innocent defendants are often put on death row, and execution by lethal injection has the risk of going horribly wrong. With the rise of the population going against the death penalty, we should influence other states to have a death penalty free

Many citizens think that lethal injection is cruel and unusual. There are other ways of execution. The electric chair, firing squads, and hangings are other methods of choice. The United States courts can reject any way of execution that seems cruel and unusual (“top 10 pros and cons- death penalty- procon.org”). Another factor that is used against the death penalty is racism. The percent of criminals that have been executed are 76% white, 7% hispanic, 15% black, and 2% other (“facts about the death penalty”). The greatest percent of the victims have been white. Other votes have been that the United States fails to protect against those with a mental illness’ (“capital punishment”). If that was the case then the court can make the decision of whether the criminal should get help or be executed. In the last 30 years there has been only 1,000 executions (“pro-death penalty.com”). The number of death sentences have dropped. In 2012 there was only 82, 83 in 2013, and 73 in 2014. The death penalty is not something that is being used often. It may even cause closure to some victims

The most debated reason over the death pentaly is if it is right or wrong morally. There are many angles to look at this question. One of the biggest concerns is how many innocent lives are taken by accident

To kill, or not to kill: that is the question. Should government withdraw people’s main right- life, who commit grave offence or not? This is one of the most considerable and disputed question in the world. For countless number of years, people from all part of the world, who exercises different religions, had various opinions toward capital punishment. Each argument has very valid reasons on why the death penalty is right and wrong, and they both have convincing points to prove their argument. In this essay, it will be outlined some historical facts concatenated to capital punishment and scrutinize either death penalty is legalized murder or necessary punishment. Preparatory to start, directly an essay, I would like to tell you bit about history of capital punishment. Firstly, let us sort out what is capital punishment and who firstly instituted capital punishment. Everybody knows the King of Babylon Hammaurabi and his legislation, however only few people know that he was first who established death penalty laws, which codified the death for 25 different crimes. It was established in the Eighteenth Century B.C. Similarly, well known Draco’s code, he made death the only punishment for аll crimes, and assuredly Rоmаn Lаw of the Twеlve Tablets. On evidence of 2006, death penalty was completely

Over the years since 1976 there has been a total of 1,392 inmates sentenced to death. On the other hand there are 3,035 inmates on death row. Out of our 50 states only 32 states allow the death penalty. Since 2016 18 people have recived the death penalty, which means out of the 318.9 million people living in america only 18 people have been punished for a serious crime. According to researchers the death penalty would be very benificial to us as a society. For example the death penalty acts as a deterrent, the constitution also allows the death penalty, and the death penalty can promote happiness and well being to non offenders.