In the article Preventive Screening for Early Readers: Predictive Validity of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS), the authors discuss how the assessment of children’s “early literacy skills can help schools promote beginning reading success for all children by improving instruction and intervention through early identification and monitoring response to intervention efforts”(p. 539). Because it has been shown that phonemic awareness and alphabetic knowledge in the early grades are strong predictors of success in acquiring beginning reading skills, the authors believe that students need to be assessed regularly through assessments such as DIBELS which can be used for screening, progress monitoring, diagnosis, and measuring student outcomes (p. 540). By screening children at risk for experiencing reading difficulties, schools can give these students additional instruction or intervention services. Assessing students often in multiple forms is important as it gives teachers progress-monitoring data that shows them whether or not instruction and or interventions are working. When it is found that a student is not progressing through current instruction, the child may be referred for a diagnostic assessments (p. 540). These assessment not only provide teachers with information about a child’s skills and needs, but are also …show more content…
The authors give case study examples that back up their claims and discuss how not only teachers and administrators, but also school psychologists can play a vital role in helping schools utilize assessment technology by taking a leadership role in implementing comprehensive school-wide assessment systems, such as the DIBELS. The area of concern that I found, was that there was no mention of any other literacy assessment such as the DRA
Reading First initiative provides proven methods of insurances and scientific based research that help guide children to learn to read. Reading First provides assistance
Child assessments of reading skill were piloted in the fall and spring of the kindergarten year, and in the spring of the first grade year. Assessments were scored using Item Response Theory, and they used IRT-scale scores at these three time points, with the first grade scores as their outcome measures in the multivariable analysis. Child and family variables were accounted for a set of child and family background and demographic factors that are
My plan for academic literacy improvement has progressed nicely this study period. Although, I understand this will be a long process - as mentioned in Grellier and Goerke (2014), the best way to develop your reading and writing skills is to do hours of exercise - each minuet step I take to improve will be beneficial. Even with my hectic life schedule, I have managed to implement all the strategies mentioned in Assessment one. The first step I needed to take was to advance my vocabulary.
What other kinds of assessment measures will yield valuable information about his students? (This will depend on the “grade” you choose for Adrian.) a. If Adrian is teaching second grade, he could examine the students AR test scores, and then he will be able to look at how the students score on their AR tests. This will lead to him testing his student’s fluency.
I incorporate this learned experience daily and learn through each success and discovered area of improvement. Addressing my students needs using a variety of assessment tools has been a beneficial practice to help guide instruction. Students have different learning styles and their strengths and weaknesses are not always apparent using the same methods of assessment. Utilizing formative, standards(goal)-based, anecdotal, observational and benchmarks has driven my instructional programs. The combination of different assessments provides me with a multi-dynamic perspective of my students allowing me to better understand their strengths, weakness and academic needs.
The early years of literacy are probably the most important ones of a child’s education. According to Copple and Bredekamp there has been compelling evidence that has shown the significant of children’s alphabet knowledge as well as their phonological awareness. This evidence shows that the awareness of both are momentous predictors in regards to children’s reading and writing in later years. These years are the foundation upon which the child grows and develops strong reading skills. Without this foundation firmly in place a child’s reading proficiency is already behind once they enter Kindergarten.
My Assessment Literacy I had the opportunity to rate my current level of understanding and proficiency against each of the five elements of Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). I believe that I need to practice more on all the five elements, with a greater emphasis on Standard 5.5. According to this standard, as a graduate teacher, I should be able to maintain accurate and reliable records of students’ achievement and use effective strategies in reporting them to the students and their parents/carers (AITSL, Standard 5.5, 2014). Teachers use formative assessment in this on-going work to monitor and improve students’ progress and they have the responsibility to undertake summative assessment, so that they could report to their parents/carers; as the students move from the current to the next year level to new teachers, they also create end-of-year reports (10, p.11).
Literature Review “Children know how to learn in more ways than we know how to teach them.” —Ronald Edmonds (1991) Each child learns in a different way, therefore if teachers are mainly focused on instructing the majority auditory/visual learners; the students who have different learning styles needs aren’t being met, which results in lack of basic skills moving forward. The idea of one instructional strategy fitting all is creating a void in classrooms; which in turn is failing to help those students struggling the most. Campbell, Helf, and Cooke, (2008) suggests a reason for some students’ ongoing lack of achievements that, “too often, students are instructed indirectly, watching and listening to the teacher or other students with little or no opportunity to actually read” (p. 268).
Curriculum and Achievement Testing Interview A first-grade teacher and recent graduate from college participated in an interview with the author. The interview questions concentrated on the curriculum utilized in the classroom in conjunction with the achievement screening instruments employed within Allen Independent School District (AISD) to determine the placement of students. In conclusion, the author deliberates on the curriculum and achievement tests practiced in the classroom and proposes a recommendation that offers a more suitable match between the curriculum and assessments. Background
An efficacy study of two school-based reading intervention program has found that the Oral language program resulted in improved vocabulary and grammatical skills while the Phonology + Reading (P+R) program resulted in improved decoding skills (Bowyer-Crane, et al., 2007). This study demonstrates the use of phonology and reading improves decoding skills, which is one of the main deficits in the phonological deficit theory. As such, phonology and reading program should also be incorporated when implementing an intervention to improve reading. More recent research has introduced a self-teaching model to develop phonological decoding in children with dyslexia. It involves encounter with an unfamiliar word with each
Introduction Many teachers in the field overlook exactly how important literacy skills are in their content area. Many often push the responsibility of training the students in literacy skills to educators in the English department. This is truly a shame since the kids are only getting a fraction of literacy skill training they need to truly be successful in all of their classes and on standardize tests. As a social studies education major I know that I can help my students develop and use literacy skills that will not only help them in my classroom, but in the other classes they are taking or will be taking.
There has been much work on defining what assessment is. Many researchers such as Black and William, Bachman, Huhta or Berry have proposed the definitions of assessment. Black and William (1998) hold the view that “teachers should see assessment as a tool to promote greater student achievement in the classroom context”. In this sense, assessment is a part of the teaching and learning process and is taken to support learning.
In each of these stages children benefit from literacy development and experiences. Children can and will develop at different rates depending if there is a developmental delay of any sort. Children’s literacy development will come and go in spurts with different areas such as doing great in reading but developing slower in their writing. Or vice versa. As children grow their literacy development will include more stages such as analyzing and synthesizing, and learning about multi viewpoints through their reading.
Early Literacy Assessment Reflection The early literacy assessments that I administered are important because they tested the student’s phonemic awareness. A student’s phonemic awareness has a direct result on the student’s successfulness in reading and writing. By administrating these tests the educator is able to gauge where a student is, and can then address and provide instruction to help the student progress and/or provide remediation for any skill(s) they are struggling with. I administered three different early literacy assessments to a student.
Using "Rhyming Centered Instruction" for Developing EFL Phonological Awareness Skills Among First Year Primary Stage Pupils By Hasnaa Sabry Abdel-Hamid Ahmed Helwa Lecturer at Department of Curriculum and TEFL Instruction Faculty of Education- Benha University- Egypt Introduction Reading proficiency involves five main skills: phonological awareness, an explicit awareness of the language sound structure; phonics awareness, understanding the link between sounds in a language with a given symbol or letter of that language; fluency and phrasing words meaningfully; vocabulary, knowing the meaning of the words one reads; and comprehension, knowing the meaning of the words in context, to tie together ideas, information and prior knowledge ( National