Introduction Electoral Politics in Nigeria is often characterized by ethnicity, political thuggery and violence. That is why some scholars have described election periods in Nigeria as warfare1. Since the colonial period in Nigeria, electoral politics has been characterized by ethnic sentiments and corruption. Obnoxious acts such as indiscriminate use of money by the very powerful and influential members of the elite class, popularly called “political godfathers” is also a feature of electoral politics in Nigeria. This situation makes elected political office holders accountable to the godfathers instead of the electorates. This often results in the mismanagement of public funds and the persistence of underdevelopment. This means that they no …show more content…
Corruption (Money and Godfatherism): Corruption of the electoral process, especially of the nature and magnitude in Nigeria, simply means that votes do not count16. This is often achieved through what is called money politics and godfatherism. Money politics refers to the excessive use of financial resources to encourage illegal activities or behaviours in politics, especially during periods of election. This occurs in different ways. Firstly, political ‘godfathers’ sponsors elections for 'godsons' and purchasing electoral victory. Secondly, businessmen and women use money illegitimately for political influence. On the other hand, political godfatherism describes a situation in which very powerful and influential members of the elite class use their power, money and influence to determine who should rule or occupy a given political office and who impose these leaders on the people. The leaders are generally forced upon the masses through intimidation, harassment and an excessive use of money. Political godfathers act as the financial backbone for politicians who want to occupy political offices at all cost. Such political office holders usually become tied to the apron string of their godfathers. According to
Political Fiancé Campaign Corruption Campaigns are hugely influenced by big money coming into their campaigns. This causes people to be very biased in how they run for political offices either for big spots such as the president and small rolls in the community. It seems like in the political side of things there is always corruption. Campaigns are corrupted because they are given the money which in turn gives power to the political action committees. Political fiancé campaign corruption needs to be regulated by enforcing laws which helps decrease the influence of political action committees, and have state or federal money to help campaigns.
Thus, many types of power are corruptible, the power of the people does not abstain from such corruption. However, it
The article by Wright Mills discusses the power elite who governs/rules the common people. They are in position to make important decisions that affect the way the rest of the population lives. At the top are advisers and consultants who make the important decisions. Just below are politicians and celebrities. In today’s American society, the economic, the political, and the military controls the major national power.
The political machines were organized groups of dishonest politicians whose goals were to take control of the city government in order to make the leaders of the organization rich. The top man in political machines was called the “Boss.” Political machines developed in major in the east coast cities in the 19th century. The power of the political machine tremendously increased and dominated in most cities, but its importance started to decline after 1900s.
One of the things that makes America so great is its election process. The US elections are fair and not rigged by the people in power(as far as the public knows.) Despite this, there are still some people who try and get the elections to go one way. This is called voter fraud. Voter fraud can take many different forms, switching ballots, tampering with results, pressuring voters, and voting in the place of others.
Corruption occurs in a government when politicians are bought out by private companies. These companies would pay the politicians large sums of money and in return, the politicians would do political favors for the companies. According
By the time the 2008 elections came around, I was so pissed off that I almost didn't show up to vote. Finally, I decided to vote because of two reasons. First, because I watched a clip of Noam Chomsky explaining why, in his thinking, people in swing states should vote for the democrats while those not living in swing states should vote for third party candidates. His point is that minor policy differences matter in peoples' everyday, real-world lives. And he's right.
6. The two party system in the U.S. can be divided historically into six major party systems. Briefly describe the nature of party competition, control of government, and the major issues of each period. What factors generated the change in party systems? Briefly discuss the various theories of realignment.
In the United States, people always talk about freedom and equality. Especially they want elections could be more democratic. In American Democracy in Peril, Hudson’s main argument regarding chapter five “Election Without the People’s Voice,” is if elections want to be democratic, they must meet three essential criteria, which are to provide equal representation of all citizens, to be mechanisms for deliberation about public policy issues, and to control what government does. Unfortunately, those points that Hudson mentions are what American elections do not have. American elections do not provide equal representation to everyone in the country.
Many people believe that the election plays the most important role in democracy. Because a free and fair election holds the government responsible and forces it to behave on voter's interest. However, some scholars find evidence that election itself is not enough to hold politicians responsible if the institutions are not shaping incentives in a correct way. In other words, the role of the election on democracy, whether it helps to serve the interest of the public or specific groups, depends on other political institutions. I