This can be fulfilled by punishing juvelives with the correct sentence, by seeing that they know their actions lead to consequence and they have the proper process for a teen to be tried as adult. As people might argue that teens should not be tried as adults because they are only children and they do not realize their actions; however, juveniles need to be punished for their crimes and there should be harder sentencing so that teens know
Her point is valid in that juveniles cannot be excused for their crimes, however Jenkins lacks the insight that much like how the brain changes through age, a teenager can transition from immaturity to maturity. Furthermore, if sentencing most juvenile to life sentences, it prevents them from learning their mistakes. For example, Greg Ousley during his adult years expressed his regret in killing his parents, and hopes to reconcile with his family members. Ousley comes to a realization, “ what he interpreted in his father as disinterest, even disgust, more likely stemmed from a paralyzing self-consciousness” (Par. 86).
However, sentencing teenagers to a life in prison without a proper trial is not justice but cruel punishment. Multiple citizens may believe it is best for America’s safety to have these individuals in jail for life. On the other hand, we should focus on what is best for the country as a whole. This may include giving a second chance to those who have committed crimes in the past. Adolescents should not be sentenced to life in prison without a proper trial, due to their maturity level, they will change as adults and should be given a second chance.
Violent crimes receive the harshest punishments, and it is said that the same should carry forth and continue for children as well. Many people believe that the age factor is taken into consideration rather than focusing on the crime factor when it comes to the juvenile courts. This is the wrong approach because it does not focus on the main problem which is the crime that has been committed. It is also said that the juvenile courts do not aim to punish, they are just merely to guide and treat. This is believed to not serve any purpose because this no way guarantees there will be no crimes committed henceforth (Borkar).
They say this because if the juvenile courts are accommodating than the minors may not understand the severity of their actions opposed to if they were to be put through a one-size-fits-all method that they may respond better. However, if minors are tried in juvenile court it may be more effective. They should do this because there they can be given methods of rehabilitation that may help them. In conclusion, juveniles should not be treated the same as adults when it comes to committing crimes so that they have a better chance to rehabilitate. Minors should not be treated the same as adults when it comes to committing crimes.
Although the novel In Cold Blood written by Truman Capote accurately portrays present day investigations on murder, it should be banned from school curriculums for young teens because of its explicit content. Young teens can often be described as emotionally unstable, and this instability can cause tolerance issues. Instability in emotions can cause irrational actions and thoughts, this can get out of control quickly causing a detrimental reaction to follow as a side affect. The novel In Cold Blood, uses emotional
Setting up Juveniles for Failure Recidivism is the tendency of a criminal to re offend. When speaking about recidivism, we tend to think that it is something inevitable. That just because a troubled teen has lived a burdensome life that there is no way for them to change their ways and get their life back on track. Nevertheless people do change and ironically focusing on the rehabilitation of juveniles that commit felonious crimes is far more effective and efficient than ensuring their punishment. Juveniles should not be tried as adults for felonious crimes because they do not receive the rehabilitation necessary to reverse recidivism rates so the juvenile justice system needs to be revised to eliminate the adult court system.
Parents, friends and guiders are responsible along with the teenager who involve a crime. This is why courts do not punish the young people like they punish the adults when they involve a crime. There are separate juvenile courts and the aim of juvenile punishment is to provide and guide the teenager to understand the importance of staying away from delinquency. The problem of juvenile delinquency has assumed alarming proportion in most modern countries today. Villages
Instead of being punished like teenagers, they are unfairly locked up in facilities with other criminals much older than them. This is an act of injustice and should not be happening. In any case, a juvenile that commits a crime should be treated as just what they are, a juvenile. This is because the teenage brain is still developing, the consequences lead to more crime, and the prosecution of the juveniles leads to negative effects after release.
Members of a gang, when arrested, will sometimes take larger sentences than they would if they would have come clean and admit their mistakes. But the fear of being perceived as a snitch is far too great compared to the fear of many years in prison. This is why apologies and owning up to mistakes just do not suffice for everybody. Going on with the topic of apologies bringing shame rather than pride, serial murderer and cannibal Jeffrey Dahmer was left with a pressing moral conflict when deciding whether or not to admit to his crimes. Dahmer was so afraid of disappointing his father, that he would have accepted the guilt of a dirty conscience rather than apologizing publicly, to the victim’s families.