In addition, ethical decision-making is a process that encompasses a great use of self-awareness and critical thinking by the practitioner. Therefore, there should be a series of steps that a social worker must take in order to resolve or intent to resolve such a dilemma. I believe that the first step should be recognizing what the ethical dilemma is. Second, the practitioner should be self-aware of how professional values, rather than personal, may interfere with the decision-making process. Lastly, the social worker must consider the structural, cultural, and agency context issues surrounding the presenting ethical dilemma.
When making decisions, there would be various examples of thought processes basing on the degree of ethical development of the individual. People who are less ethically developed may think that they should act ethically since they will be punished if they do not. Besides, people who have more progressed moral advancement may contend that they ought to act morally in light of the fact that their nation's laws say they ought to. People at the highest level of ethical development may claim that they should act ethically because it's always right to do so, regardless of what the results and costs are. In fact, there is a great amount of ethical issues commonly happening that create negative effects on the public confidence such as extortion, bribery or dishonest advertising
Professional Ethics Some professionals have the ability to be good while others do not. The capacity to follow the stipulations of their professions is what determines the ratings for whether professional is right or wrong. Various forms of ethics govern how professionals carry out their day-to-day activities. There are role moralities and common moralities whose applications clash with one another. The paper focuses on Luban’s work and talks about role morality and the rule of utilitarianism in justifying the ethical roles among the professionals.
We have a freedom to choose between these two roads, but a voice will whisper, our conscience, and will tell and urges us which road to follow that is for the betterment of our welfare. Both ethics and morality must be objective, but somehow, some reasons were accepted because of the gravity of the situation. Like in a life and death situation. One must think critically to surpass and have these
Ethics are (standards) that are used by individual or group to determine what the right path of action in a situation is. Ethics depend on logical and rational standard to reach a decision, an basically cognitive process (Congress, 1999; Dolgoff, Loewenberg, & Harrington, 2009; Reamer, 1995; Robison & Reeser, 2002). Values, moreover, describe ideas that we estimate. To value something means that we feel it has worth to us. Often, values are ideas that we want to achieve, like equality and social justice.
“The Possession of Knowledge Carries an Ethical Responsibility.” Evaluate this claim. When I looked in to this quote, it struck me because it is stating that if you know about some knowledge you must use them according to your ethical beliefs. Possession of knowledge means to me that it is not only what you know about certain things, but also what it’s capability is. And Ethical responsibility is assuming that you would have the authority to choose what is ethically right. This quote assumes that all people with knowledge must use it ethically.