ipl-logo

Six Dissociative Party System

963 Words4 Pages

Throughout the history of the United States, there has been a total of six distinctive party systems. As the years went by, the political parties have experienced downturns and realignments. The first distinctive party emerged around the 1790s. The political parties were the Federalists and the Jeffersonian (Democratic) Republicans. The federalists formed in 1791 led by Alexander Hamilton, who were mainly New England merchants. They were for a strong central government, the newly written constitution, and the national bank. During the 1970s, the Federalists’ ideologies and beliefs were against the norms of society. The Federalist eventually collapsed and never held power again after 1801. Their opposing party was the Democratic-Republican Party led by Thomas Jefferson and former Anti-Federalists. They were for states’ rights and a loose constitution interpretation.They were used to the norms of society; therefore, they were not ready for the Federalists to change the nation. The nation had just gotten out of the Revolutionary War and gained their independence; therefore, they believed that the Federalists would lead them back to the crown. This was the major reason that the Jeffersonians had a strong opposition towards the Federalists. After the …show more content…

The Populist party was a result of these changes. The Populist party mainly consisted of small farmers, urban workers, and western miners. The Populist party had managed to carry candidates in at least twelve states. In 1896, the Democrats emerged with the Populist party, nominating William Jennings Bryan, and the Republicans nominating William McKinley. After the Republican victory in the presidential election, they became the party of businesses, advocating low taxes and a minimum government interference. Until the Great Depression, the Republicans would dominate the government for at least three

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Hamilton And The Federalists

    314 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalists believed in many things and had strong support. They believed in strong federal government and rule by the wealthy class, which caused them to favor the idea of national bank and business. They argued that the national bank was allowed because the Consitution gave Congress the power to issue money and regulate trade. They also trusted a loose interpretation of the Consitution, this made them think they had implied powers, which were powers not included in the Consitution. Another thing that the Federalists believed in was protective tariffs.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Jeffersoniaians And Federalists

    202 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Federalists favored strong central government putting more faith in the government instead of the people they were supposed to represent. The federalists were also in favor of the elite and allying closely with the British. Hamilton still admired British culture even after he fought for American independence from the British. The Federalists were also in favor of regulations for entrepreneurs, unlike the Jeffersonians who were in favor of being free of intrusive government regulations. The Federalists were also in favor of integrating the United States into the global economy to further the industrial industry.

    Read More

  • Populist Party Research Paper

    103 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the middle of a deterioration in crop prices and a troubling political chaos the Populist Party was established. The Populists Party was correctly as it broadcasted, for the people. The Populist Party was a short term political party in the United States, recognized in 1891. The party was at its toughest in 1892 through 1896 and then quickly wore away. The Populists offered both better government regulation over the economy and to give the people more control over the government through the secret ballot, direct election of United States senators and replacement of the Electoral College with direct election by popular

    Read More

  • Essay On Jefferson's Consolidation Of Power Dbq

    1149 Words  | 5 Pages

    After the American Revolution, the formation of a new government was precedent. Federalists were afraid of disorder, anarchy, and chaos; the unchecked power of the masses, and sought for the constitution to create a government distant from popular passions. On the other hand, antifederalists were more concerned about the dangers of concentrated power. Equally, the antifederalists opposed the constitution because of the obstacles between the people and the exercised power, which is why federalists supported it. Hamilton was the Leader of the federalist party while Jefferson was the leader of the Republican party.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    386 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before I state my opinion, I must lay out the two opposing sides between the federalists and the anti Federalists. To put it simply, federalists were people who supported the ratification of the constitution. 
On the other side of the spectrum the anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the constitution. If I was living in the in the 1780’s I probably would have voted and supported the ratification of the constitution. I am the type of person that wants a strong and unified central government.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    254 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the 1790s two major parties dominated the political scene. Those parties were people who sided with Alexander Hamilton, known as “Federalists” while the people who supported Thomas Jefferson were the “Anti-Federalists”. During the conclusion of the table, it was quite evident that the Anti-Federalists were considered to be more liberal, or in a broader sense, Democratic than the other party at the time. This can be inferred through the notion that they supported France throughout the French Revolution because they hated Britain because they once controlled everything they did; while on the contrary, the Federalists, which consisted of mostly business people, supported Britain due to their importance in trades. They also were against the

    Read More

  • Anti Federalism Dbq

    1397 Words  | 6 Pages

    To a major extent, the political ideology of the Jeffersonian Republican party resembled that of the Anti-Federalists in the debates that occurred during the ratification of the US Constitution. Anti-Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republican party favored the people more than the elites that the Federalists and Hamiltonian Federalists party favored. The main ideology in the Anti Federalists and Jeffersonian party were to have the power and say in government be more in the people’s hands rather than having it to select few elites. The Anti-Federalists and the Jeffersonian party believed in preserving individual liberties, which can be shown during the ratification of the constitution and how the Bill of Rights made it into the constitution.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Alexander Hamilton And Hamilton

    884 Words  | 4 Pages

    After the Constitution of the United States of America was ratified, George Washington put its words into action. With the formation of his Cabinet, he appointed two men that soon created conflicts with their contrasting beliefs about how the new government should be run. These men, Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, soon gained support and divided the country into political parties. Those who supported a stronger federal government, like Hamilton, called themselves Federalists; in opposition, Jefferson leading the Democratic republicans, favored a stronger state government. Both parties had America’s best interest at heart, however Hamilton and the Federalists’ ideas concerning the economy, interpretation of the Constitution, and the future of American society made them more fit for governing the United States.

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson And The Anti-Federalists

    235 Words  | 1 Pages

    16) Thomas Jefferson and the Anti-Federalists believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, more power to the states, and supported trade with the French. When Hamilton issued the idea of a National Bank, Jefferson opposed it, saying that it was not a specific power given directly in the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson, however, changed his views on strict and loose interpretation of the Constitution when he purchased Louisiana territory. He used a loose interpretation of the Constitution and used treaty-making powers to seal the deal with France. Another principle was the power to the states.

    Read More

  • Federalist Party Assignment

    706 Words  | 3 Pages

    AAS Political Science Unit 4 Assignment The Federalist Party Led by John Adams , Alexander hamilton, and john Marshall. Formed from the group that fought for a stronger Federal government before the ratification of the constitution. • Our first 2 president George Washington and John Adams were Federalists • Associated mostly with the rich and fought for industry rather than farming • Had a stronger alliance with Britain over France • Were is favor of a more central government than individual states The party split during the War of 1812.

    Read More

  • Federalist Vs Anti Federalists Dbq Essay

    1529 Words  | 7 Pages

    As the country’s first president, George Washington supplied a national sense of unity for eight years. When Washington retired, the people split into two political parties, the Federalists and Republicans, and they started the first party system in our country’s history. The national government was strengthened because the Federalists were so involved in shaping the new U.S. Constitution. However, the Antifederalists disapproved the ratification of the U.S. Constitution.

    Read More

  • Federalist Vs. Anti-Federalists

    736 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Anti-Federalist believed that the Constitution granted too much power to the federal courts and took power from the states, depriving citizens of liberties. The Federalist believed that "The smaller the number of individuals composing a majority, and the smaller the compass within which they are placed, the more easily will they concert and execute their plans of oppression. Extend the sphere, and you take in a greater variety of parties and interests; you make it less probable that a majority of the whole will have a common motive to invade the rights of other citizens" (Federalist Papers, No. 10). The Anti-Federalist wanted a national representation large enough to secure a substantial representation of the middle class, but not a very large one. They did not want a large national representation because they believed it may derive liberties from local state representatives.

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The Anti-Federalists

    319 Words  | 2 Pages

    (Video Lecture, "Anti-Federalists.") Their belief was that the people would grow bored with politics that do not directly involve their everyday life. Americans would be more interested in local politics than that of large govermnent.

    Read More

  • First Party System Analysis

    244 Words  | 1 Pages

    The first party system in the united states was between the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans and this helped shape the political contest. The Federalist Party, created largely by Alexander Hamilton, rivaled by Jeffersonian Democratic-Republican Party which was formed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison and is usually called at the "Republican Party.” Van Buren helped form the new Democratic Party from a coalition of Jeffersonian Republicans who backed the military hero and president Andrew Jackson. In Martin Van Buren letter to Thomas Ritchie he states, “It would greatly improve the condition of the republican party of the north and middle states by substituting party principle for personal presence as one of the leading points.”

    Read More

  • What Was The Influence Of Political Parties

    882 Words  | 4 Pages

    Following the panic of 1839 what really drove America, was not the political parties, but the American peoples ability to combine the country for economic purposes. The affect of political parties had on the economic development of the United States changed over time, and lessened as American businessmen and entrepreneurs started to think of their own ideas such as Eli Whitney’s cotton gin. In the beginning the American people need to rely on the political parties to create a strong government. That would fight for protection of American products through tariffs.

    Read More

More about Six Dissociative Party System

Open Document