“Romeo and Juliet” is a love story with a tragic ending. Two lovers have been forbidden from seeing each other due to a feud between their families, and are not able to pursue what would make them happy. Towards the end of the story, Romeo and Juliet decide that they would rather not live at all than have to live without one another. The question of who’s really to blame for the lovers death remains a highly controversial opinion. Overall, Tybalt is the main reason for Romeo and Juliet’s death, due to his vengeful and aggressive character. The vengeful side of Tybalt is greatly shown in act 1 when he chooses to hunt Romeo down after recognizing him at the party. Although Romeo should not have been at the Capulet's party, the head of the …show more content…
In act 3, Tybalt finds Romeo and wants to fight him, but Romeo refuses. “Doth much excuse the appertaining rage, To such a villain am i none. Therefore farewell. I see thou knowest me not.” Tybalt was not satisfied with peace and decided to fight Mercutio instead. During their brawl, Tybalt stabs Mercutio, resulting in Romeo’s best friend's death. Romeo then agrees to fight Tybalt because one of them should go to rest along with Mercutio. “That late thou gavest me; for Mercutio’s soul, is but a little way above our heads, staying for thine to keep him company. Either thou or I, or both, must go with him.” When the two fought, Romeo won against Tybalt and killed him. When people find out the decision is made for Romeo to be exiled from the city. When the lovers find out that they have no chance of being with each other, they decide they would rather take themselves out of their misery. The exile of Romeo is what ultimately decided the fate of “Romeo and Juliet”. Some may argue that Romeo deserved his exile because he killed someone, but Romeo only resorted to violence after he watched his best friend undeservingly die in a duel with Tybalt. Romeo would not have been executed if Tybalt never came searching for trouble. Romeo should not be the one to blame because he would have never originally been violent, he only agreed to fight once Tybalt killed his best
If he wasn’t such a bad person he wouldn’t get so upset about Romeo going to the party when Romeo didn’t do anything but find his true love. If Tybalt wouldn’t have been so hard-headed everything could be fine. Tybalt is to blame for the tragic deaths of Romeo and Juliet because he could have ended the situation without having a
“You will not be punished for your anger, you will be punished by your anger,” Buddha had once said. This saying is easily relatable to Tybalt in Romeo and Juliet. Supposing that Tybalt did not give into his anger, and he did not challenge Romeo to a duel, he would have never been killed. The cause of Tybalt's death is his own fault because he starts the fight, comes back to the fight, and kills Mercutio.
Tybalt’s burning need for what he thinks is justified revenge is needed for all the subsequent conflicts to occur. These conflicts, such as Romeo’s exile, then create such turmoil that Romeo would rather die than be without his lover, Juliet, which shows the passion and love the two of them share. This makes the unfortunate demise of the two main characters powerful thus creating the plot of the story. None of this would have happened without Tybalt’s death acting as the starting domino that set everything in motion. Another resulting conflict caused by Tybalt occurs when Juliet’s parents try to help her get over her sadness which they presume is about Tybalt’s death and plan a wedding to a friend of the Capulets, Paris.
As Romeo talks to Tybalt out of the dual, Tybalt realized Romeo does have a plausible reason on why they shouldn’t fight each other. However,
Did you ever wonder who was to blame for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet? Today, we are going to dive into this situation. The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet by William Skakespear starts with Romeo and Juliet meeting up at a party and decide to get married the next day. Romeo ended up killing Tybalt just after the wedding and ended up getting banished. Romeo then learns Juliet “dies” and rushes back to Vernona and he kills himself.
Romeo tells Tybalt “the reason that I have to love thee/doth much excuse the appertaining rage/to such a greeting. Villain am I none.” Romeo is family with Tybalt. He tries to calm Tybalt down, but he wants to fight. Mercutio steps up to fight him because Romeo refuses to fight his new family.
When tybalt challenges romeo to a fight and he denies mercutio steps up for the challenge romeo tries to stop it and results in getting mercutio killed he cures the houses at last romeo gets mad and hunts tybalt down t kill him and gets banished to mantua Benvolio says:”envious thrust from Tybalt hit the life Of stout Mercutio, and then Tybalt fled. But by and by comes back to Romeo, Who had but newly entertained revenge, And to 't they go like lightning; for, ere I Could draw to part them, was stout Tybalt slain, And, as he fell, did Romeo turn and fly'' (Act 3 scene 1). Tybalt deserves the most blame because If tybalt hadn't killed mercutio romeo would never have killed him meaning he wouldn't have gotten banished from seeing juliet all the way to mantua she wouldn't be
Romeo takes revenge and kills Tybalt. Romeo showed what violence can do to a person, saying, "That late thou gavest me, For Mercutio’s soul/ Is but a little way above our heads,/ Staying for thine to keep him company./ Either thou or I, or both, must go with him." (III.i.119-122). This fight shows the
He wants to fight, but Romeo is not budging, for he does not want to harm Juliet’s cousin. So instead of Romeo fighting Tybalt, Mercutio fights Tybalt because Romeo will not fight for himself. Romeo steps between them and tries to stop the duel, but Tybalt manages to stab Mercutio underneath Romeo’s
Despite Benvolio’s efforts to keep the peace, a fight occurs between Tybalt and Mercutio- who offers to fight Tybalt instead of Romeo. As the two are fighting, Romeo tries to intervene,
Out of respect for his uncle, Tybalt did not fight Romeo at that moment. However, he did send out a message across Verona stating that he wanted to duel him. During Tybalt’s search for Romeo, he encountered Mercutio. At that time Tybalt had no issues with Mercutio and told him to stay out of the way. Although, as you can see in this quote from the play, Mercutio showed signs of arrogance and tried to tempt Tybalt into fighting him.
On page 428-429, Romeo and Tybalt fight, and Tybalt is the one who falls. Some might argue that Tybalt’s hot head and aggression is the reason the tragic ending occurred, but Romeo took his own decision to slay Tybalt, and also unknowingly aided the death of his friend, mercutio. Many might also argue that the Friar, for his options that he presents to the young teens, was to blame for the loss of the two. However, what he presented were only options, Romeo and Juliet were not forced to accept or execute any of plans. What they did was completely based on their own decisions.
Tybalt always wanted to fight Romeo. Tybalt and Mercutio get into a fight because of some upsetting words Tybalt said. In the fight Tybalt kills Mercutio, which get Romeo upset. Then Romeo kills Tybalt, which gets him banished form Verona, Italy. So the long-standing family feuding and fate are the cause of Romeo and Juliet’s deaths.
According to Benvolio who was at the scene, Tybalt was the one who would not back off from Romeo. He was even quoted to say that “Tybalt was deaf to peace”.
In the third act, Tybalt challenges Romeo to a fight due to the fact that Romeo crashed Capulet’s party. However Romeo did not want to fight his cousin in law so he said, “Tybalt, the reason that I have to love thee, doth much excuse the appertaining rage to such greeting. Villain I am none” (3.1.59-61). Romeo’s reasons were pardoned since Tybalt is very short-tempered, in result he began attacking Romeo, and Romeo did not fight back. However, Mercutio could not bear to stand down without a fight, his actions later on ended his life.