GOALS AND MISSION STATEMENTS DARINA NAIDOO QUESTION 1: Source A and B are considered to be examples of personal mission statements. In source A, Mahatma Gandhi says to not be afraid or think ourselves lower than others but we must not think ourselves to be high and almighty either. We must not hold grudges toward people that have done us wrong but must not submit to ill treatment either. The truth can be denied, not avoided so in other words there is no need for physical violence. Lies can be conquered by truth. In Source B, Ben Franklin goes into greater depth of words that can be held as morals and values as it appeals to our humanity and can be used as guidelines for our actions. Both source A and B can be used as a guide for one's actions and decision making, they can be applied and accomplished in our daily routines and behaviour. …show more content…
It gives me a sense of empowerment telling me that I am accountable for my actions and behaviour. Gandhi’s personal mission statement holds a strong sense of justice explaining in a simple way how to go about doing the right thing while not being underhanded. ‘I shall not bear ill will toward anyone. I shall not submit to injustice to anyone. ‘If you are unhappy with someone or something do something to resolve it but not while holding thing against or spiting others. ‘Put up with all suffering’ don’t give in and be strong till the end’. I like the way he puts his thoughts into
Benjamin Franklin’s speeches are also the talk of the
Significant References in Fahrenheit 451 As Dave Attell once said, “You know, men and women are a lot alike in certain situations. Like when they’re both on fire-they’re exactly alike.” Attell’s quote ties in perfectly with Fahrenheit 451 regarding the novel’s futuristic society. The government’s goal is to make everyone equal and create overall happiness by making books illegal and disposing of all the remaining books through the rise of fire.
This quote presents how hypocritical The Declaration of Independence was, since all men were not created equal. Although it says how these “truths” are self-evident, it clearly shows how all men were not created equal. In addition, Source D presents the viewer how Slavery was a predicament, so this lead Ben Franklin to convince Thomas Jefferson to remove it from the original draft because there was no solution to it. As a final point, the commonalities that all three of these Sources share is that The Declaration of Independence is
There are good people and there are bad people, but none of them are perfect. Perfection is impossible in this world, and, by failing to recognize that, Franklin presents the world in far simpler terms than what would do the world
Ben Franklin’s was “Speech in the Convention.” Benjamin Franklin wants to not fight in war but Patrick Henry does. Benjamin Franklin agrees with our Constitution but Henry does not. Benjamin Franklin said that we all need to stand together to prevent war. Franklin was Federalist but Henry was Anti-Federalist.
All throughout Wood's book the reader will see insight from both sides and be able to imply ones own outlook on Franklin's loyalty to the
Benjamin Franklin’s 13 virtues are truly something to follow. They contain a theme of avoiding conflict and being clean, mentally and physically. The virtues that seem the most important in achieving a well-balanced life, to me, are Franklin’s Silence and Order. I chose these two out of the 13 because they were the closest to my personality currently. As a child, I was taught to think before I speak and that “Words hurt more than actions.”
There were a lot of American men who had perfect influence on people’s mind of American society. Jonathan Edward and Benjamin Franklin were two of those writers, who were the most important and intellectual men, who left behind many admirable works for the future society. In spite of them being so intelligent, they have some different and similar views in terms of morality, personal responsibility, human nature, and limits of human knowledge and inform people how to live a better life. In addition, they were different in terms of religious inclinations. Benjamin Franklin and Jonathan Edward were both philosopher and had similar views in terms of informing people the right way to live in order to be successful and get salvation by reforming their mind in their life.
Reading through part I of the “Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin,” there are several traits displayed immediately. From Franklin being extremely ambitious to believing in himself when others didn’t and even not being afraid of competition, he paved a way for many business people to look up to and follow his lead. One of the most important messages received from Franklin’s journey that should be adopted is that of not letting his past effect his future. The narrator states, “I was fatigued with traveling, rowing and want of rest, I was very hungry; and my whole stock of cash consisted of a Dutch dollar, and about a shilling in copper” (Franklin, 1996, p.19). Franklin allowed his in trust in God to never fail which lead him to success; Proverbs 3:5 states, “Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding” (King James Version).
“Words can inspire, and words can destroy. Choose yours well.” - Robin Sharma. In 1787, a convention was held to determine the efficiency of a debatable Constitution discussed by the delegates. Benjamin Franklin, having represented Pennsylvania, then presented a speech regarding his position on the topic, declaring his agreement to it in spite of his uncertainty on whether or not it will result in negative consequences in the future.
Benjamin Franklin was a great man that had influences in many areas and because of that he had many enemies but because he understood human behavior he enabled himself to turn enemies into allies. To understand the Benjamin Franklin effect you need to know that the things you do often create the things you believe. An example is when “Franklin ran for his second term as a clerk, one of his colleagues delivered a long speech to the legislature lambasting Franklin. Franklin still won his second term, but this guy truly pissed him off. So he set out to turn his hater into a fan, but he wanted to do it without paying any servile respect to him.
Franklin stresses the importance of having respect towards others religions. He states, “...respect to all, with an opinion that the worst had some good effects”, emphasizing that while a particular religion may not be correct in our eyes, it still could have “good effects” for society as a whole (Andrews, 133). Franklin had a more positive view on the effects of religion for society, whereas Paine would describe it as a heresy, but that “they have the same right to their belief as I have to mine” (Paine,
Franklin claims that he has been living long enough to see errors that he made, therefore as he grow older, he tend to “doubt of [his] own judgment” because nobody is perfect due to his past experiences (43). The informations that Franklin presents is to show his reputation that he is not perfect, also his constitution but he is open minded and willing to make what is best for the people. The perspective errors of the constitution have, is being “sacrificed to the public good” meaning all the flaw that constitution have will not be reveal to the people (44). Franklin is very passion about what is best for the people and their happiness, furthermore his characteristic is very respectful toward the citizen and the congress.
Due to the race inequality along with the economic regulations among the Indian people, Gandhi’s ambition from the beginning of simply just wanting equality between the Indian and British transition to wanting India to become Independence. He wanted to give the Indian citizen a voice in the government and a chance to define their own nation. The Indian people lose their political power in terms of how the British authorities were exercising their power over them, implementing policies according to their own rules and administrating over the Indian’s resources. Gandhi throughout the film had the desire to help gain back India’s political power and it revolves around his method of passive resistance and self-sacrifice. He belief in “an eye for an eye only makes people blind” is what helped him achieve freedom for India without any violence involve.
It provide us with a shared set of rights and wrongs on which our social norm depends for existence. Also, it guides a person through the stages of life and show them the way of