Another con of house arrest is that the offender is responsible for paying for his device. This makes it unfair because some offenders may not be able to afford it and have to go to a government facility. Another con is that many people think that house arrest people get off easy. We are in the “Tough on Crime” era in society so people think that the offenders should have to serve out their time in a government facility. And Because they are on house arrest they do not have to be in there house all day every day.
You can see it as the mayor is helping everyone he is trying to make the city more presentable and he’s making a shelter for the numerous of people without a home to stay in for the reason he claims to be because the weather has been awfully bad and especially recently. Although it maybe true that the conductors of this event is ashamed to have homeless people presented outside on the streets, but some people have disagreed with this statement saying that the staff had informed the poor that there was a shelter nearby and that relocating was in their best interest-it was the only way to really ensure their safety during the establishment of new buildings. I have read an article dedicated to this event and it shows multiple perspectives of what they thought of the homeless needing to move from their spot. The article states that the homeless people are being ordered to move due to the city development. However the team carrying out the service denies that that’s the reason why they are moving them from the place they were currently at.
It bundled up home loans from states like California, Florida, Nevada and Arizona,etc which became some of the worst victims of the US housing crash, consistent with his prediction.They expected 123 hedge funds to decline in the future. On the other hand, Goldman Sachs was unethically profiting at the expense of the same clients it was trying to lure in million dollar mortgages which they knew would fail. In its defence, it claimed that if the investors had not liked the underlying securities they could have turned away from making the investment and that it was home owners fault that they took loans they could not afford. It was confident that it had done nothing illegal; neither was it trying to take advantage of the decline in housing market. However Goldman Sachs had been terribly wrong .Honesty is expected by any person or institution.
When it comes to buying or renting a house they go through a more complicated process than a heterosexual couple and there is not a federal law in place to prevent it (Human Rights Campaign,b). Some challenges are when buying or selling a home they have to pay more in taxes, discriminated when shopping for a home, they cannot put their partner 's name on the lease or homeowner’s insurance policy (Human Rights Campaign,b). The human rights campaign states, “…Couples have been discriminated against when shopping for a home. Others have been told they cannot put both partners ' names on a homeowner 's insurance policy, which is important to do if both partners share ownership of the home. And still other couples have been discriminated against when filing a claim as some insurance companies have attempted to refuse claims or cancel policies on the grounds that the owners are "unrelated"” (Human Rights Campaign,b).
When confidentiality goes wrong at a care home, it can lose trust between a care worker and a service user i.e if a service user were to notify the care worker that they wanted their door closed at night and the care worker were to proceed and tell someone else without consent, even if messages are passed on accidentally this doesn 't change anything as you still broke confidentiality making it an intolerable practice in health and social care
When the building collapsed on them, it should not have been as big of surprise as it ended up being. The building was structurally unsound and the owner knew this, but garment factories can not afford to go out of business for even a day. They earn extremely little money to start with, so any missed days takes a large toll on the owners of these factories. Most people would think that after the tragedy of the Rana Plaza, other textile factories would have higher standards, but sadly, this is not the case. In the film The Cost of Cloth: Ethical Textiles it describes a regular textile factory found today.
This example refers to a family renting an apartment in a perfectly unregulated market. Once the rent freeze system is introduced, the married couple has no incentive to move into a smaller apartment, due to the protective rent control. However, the fact that their children had already moved out, results in excess capacity (space, heat, water). In addition, however unfortunate and ironic it may be, landlords tend to reduce their offerings of rental units on the housing market as a result of rent control measures, leading to further shortages in the supply. Many pre-existing objects located in New York are attached to high values, since they are scarce remainders of World War II.
They tend to choose an area where the crime is high, where there’s no jobs or transportation. Because of this, people of color lose opportunities in education, quality housing, and good paying jobs. This would impact my personal health because I come from affordable housing. Luckily I was able to attend college but some of my family members don’t have the same chance as
Adding to the woes the recession and its aftermaths are still taking its tolls, however strong the denial is. Now is the time for a reality check – how to go for cost effective houses. Affordability issues have resulted in people looking for methods to build cheap houses. Google down the methods of
Sure we all weren’t born the same, but that doesn’t mean we can’t be given these opportunities to see if we can succeed. The people from the low class, like the homeless people for example are understandable since they are usually known to drop out of school with not much education or even a high school diploma. They chose their lives to be like that, and they still get money, just not from their jobs. But even then, not all the homeless people are the same, some of them got their homes taken away since the money kept stacking up and they just couldn’t keep up anymore. That doesn’t mean they weren’t
This may be helping the debtor but by causing the creditor to lose money it could cause a chain reaction. Law 23 causes the city mayor or territory governor to lose a large sum of money.The law 23 is"If the robber is not caught,the man who has been robbed shall formally declare whatever he has lost before a God,and the city and the territorial mayor or mayor of the district has been committed shall replace for him whatever he has lost." This meaning the mayor must pay for some other person mistakes. The robber is left and could escape while the mayor and city