The British first took control of India in 1759, when the “East India Company,” a British corporation, used their private military to take advantage of the declining government of India, the Mughal Dynasty. After this, they exploited it for its natural wealth and imposed regulations on India’s people that helped profits, particularly after the British government got involved personally. Finally, after decades of protest and conflict, India gained independence in 1947 due to the efforts of activists such as Mohandas Gandhi and their supporters. As supporters of imperialism would argue, during this Britain maintained structured control, provided trade, and protected Indian culture. However, they restricted freedoms, imposed poverty, and destroyed …show more content…
British rule over india as a colonial state was effective and precise in the eyes of British supporters, but it was only this way through its discriminatory measures, separating Indians as well as creating conflict, and was thusly not in the benefit of India’s natives. At first glance, it may seem that Indians were advanced by the efficient rule which the colonists employed(Lalvani). However, this governing body was led by a tiny minority of native Indians, outnumbered 1 to 15 by British invaders( Document #2). This left them all but voiceless as the British installed drastic laws such as the Rowlatt Act, meant to disempower aboriginals by allowing the British to imprison supposed terrorists, meaning protesters, without a trial(Gandhi). Still, the British feared further revolt among Indians, and with so few of them there to enforce their laws they needed a police force staffed by the very people they sought to oppress. Again, in hindsight this may appear to have been military training which only helped to instill peace and empower natives(Lalvani). When you consider the reality that these soldiers were wielded as a force of control this illusion is dispelled, with such events as the Amritsar Massacre showing the intent of the British to increase their influence in India(Gandhi). This system was not benevolent, this training not helpful. Indians were being used as a source of …show more content…
Unfortunately, they had little power to fight back due to holding a minority of important positions in governing as the British instituted cruel laws. Taxing and extracting from India was the purpose of this venture which tore India into two nations, and deteriorated the land. To quote Dr. Lalvani in reference to the imperialism of India, “The sheer audacity and scale of such an endeavor, the courage and enterprise have no parallel in history.” Ostensibly, there is a fine line between enterprise and greed, and one may cover up the other when it must. Greed, that most distinct corruption, which has sabotaged the unity of our species more times than is estimable, and which to the this day is shaping the face of India, as well as the rest of our
India was most impacted by British imperialism because the poverty
They marched saying “we burn british cloth” British soldiers got a small group of indians and beat then until they saw the large group of marchers coming, they start running after them and threw their torches into the british buildings British soldiers came out and the Indians got violent towards them and they died. Because this contradicts the campaign Gandhi says the campaign needs to end “An eye for an eye only ends up making the world blind”gandhi says this to the people who tell him not to end the campaign (Jinnah and
The British rulers of India helped settle 500 million diverse peoples with different religions all over India during their rulership, providing stronger communities held together by values of religion (Paragraph 6). However, the people of India were given little to no responsibility of themselves and their own nation (Document 1). Meaning the British also created a great divide of the native people and the British imperialists get to dictate what taxes and laws exist, all of which to only better the lives of themselves and did not pertain to the basic human needs for the people who actually lived in India. Paragraph 12 shows that the British did bring several different states of India into one unified nation to help establish an effective justice system, civil service, loyal army, and efficient police force to protect the people of India. On the other hand, document 2 shows that the Indians had no say in the taxes they had to pay to the British or how they spent their money as a nation.
Gandhi’s “first contact with British Authority in that was country was not of a happy character. [He] discovered that as a man and as an Indian [he] had no rights” (29-30). Gandhi’s first experience with the British government was unpleasant merely because he was an Indian man. Gandhi goes on to explain the suffering that the Indians experienced due to the passing of the Rowlatt Act of 1919, which caused the “Punjab horrors beginning with the massacre at Jallianwala Bagh and culminating in crawling orders, public floggings, and other indescribable humiliations” (30). Gandhi’s intent is for the audience before him to take what he is saying to heart, to fully understand how the British are treating the
Only in the past decade have historians begun to examine the meanings and functions of martial race ideology in its late Victorian context. This scholarship treats martial race ideology as a British fabrication, a calculated set of beliefs born out of specific recruiting needs, a uniquely colonial understanding of the Indian society, and 19th century conceptions of race. The majority of studies argue that these beliefs came to their most coherent expression in the years between 1880 and 1914. In this period, advocates of martial race policies consciously and systematically sought to spread information about the martial worthiness and unworthiness of different groups of Indians. British officers wrote a series of handbooks on the merits of
This shows the corrupted British government does not care what happens to India but only uses India for money and power. Gandhi was a lawyer and saw how Indians were truly treated in person which started his dissatisfaction with the government. Thus, said it started in, “1893 in South Africa… My first contact with the British authorities in that country was not happy. I discovered that as a man and as an Indian I had no rights.
10 million Indian lives were taken by the british during their rule over India. Great Britain gained control of India in 1601 with the English East India Company and later because of their strong army, navy, and economic power Great Britain saw an opportunity to gain control of a vast amount of land and took control of India. Many natives were against British control because of their unjustified way of ruling, but one man lead a nonviolent movement that made India independent again, his name was Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi’s non-violent movement was able to work because of his determination, the support from other protesters and his willingness to keep the protest non-violent. Gandhi's determination to make India independent again is one
Dr.Lalvani claims that under British rule, India was modernized, giving the foundation for a government that therefore gave law and order. While this system and others were built, they were built almost entirely for British benefit and even profit. In this new government, Indians had no say in the laws being decided by the British, that were impacting them. The laws were meant to further control Indians, while the British extracted India’s wealth and flood India’s markets with textiles with the help of railroads. Wanting more and more wealth, the British logged forests to create land to grow cash crops which in the end degraded the soil making it more difficult for them to grow.
Imperialism is expanding a country’s influence and power using military force or diplomacy. This greatly helped many countries, such as Great Britain, France, and Germany. However it hurt other countries who were not in favour of imperialism, such as Egypt, China, and India. Peoples in colonized countries developed nationalist resistance movements to protest imperialism, both violently and nonviolently, whereas supporters of imperialism claimed it brought modernity, civilization, and education to “backward” colonized people. Imperialism is more easily understood when put into context.
Imperialism by definition is “the policy of extending the rule or authority of an empire or nation over foreign countries.” India had the largest impact from Imperialism brought upon by the British Imperialist movement that began in 1858. The British rule lasting nearly 90 years caused havoc on the Indian people and the government, although it temporarily improved the economic growth of the nation. According to document seven, “India became an agricultural colony of the industrial England.” There were many positive and negative impacts that came out of the long and unfair firm government laws.
Throughout the rule of the British in India, Europeans mainly controlled the government and police force, leaving the Indians with no voice and no protection. According to Dr. Lalvani, the British established an efficient administration over 500 million people. While this was beneficial to the British, the Indians had no control over the taxations and laws that affected them (Doc. #2). Since all of these laws and taxes were targeted to help the British, India’s freedom was stolen, as shown in the Rowlatt Act, a law that allowed the government to imprison people without trial.
This was a long and tedious job without the machine that the British had, but they still did this for their independence. At the end of it, the British were no longer profiting from Indian goods, and the Indians were no longer paying for their own goods either. Gandhi’s idea for this movement was a huge step into the beginning of the renewing of India’s
They gave them no say in their taxation at all. Britain rule was bad because it made the Indians extremely poor and left them with no money for food. It also impacted India in a negative way because all their soil for farming was destroyed and they also built railroads right in the middle of the towns. These railroads were used to benefit Britain because it made shipping materials and trade easier for them. Lastly, British rule caused lots of deaths from famine.
At the sea, Gandhi picked up a handful of salt. This act went against the British law mandating that they buy salt from their government and this law did not allow them to collect their own salt. That act was made to let the British government know that the Indian people were tired of being under Britain’s rule and they were tired of following all of the unjust laws that were
In the article Lalvani states that, the British “established the framework for India’s justice system, civil service, loyal army and efficient police force”. The British may have set up a government but the framework, however, did not include Indians. “ Of 960 civil offices...900 are occupied by Englishmen and only 60 by natives” (Doc 2). In no way are 60 voices of a race considered ‘savage’ going to overpower 900 white men, who could easily kill them for taking a stand, or trying to change the unjust laws that are