221 830 this worker went to an IEP meeting held at Lebanon elementary school board the meeting start off with an induction worker garden teacher special-education teacher pathways teacher Mr. Gates this worker and principal mr. Teasley and body by phone. The present level that Terrence is dealing with being ripped away from his family which was stated by Mr. Gates. Miss Moore reported that Terrence was call for testing it was no red flag in his reading or math he was of average range. Miss Moore stated that. Terrence is trying to cope with foster care. Mr. Gates reported that Terrence prize 45 minutes hour after his mother leaves for visitation are you speak to family on the phone. Certain triggers cousin Terrence to add violent. Meeting spoke …show more content…
Terrence had a communication or motor skill problem. Just to get signed off for the IEP. I can't the meeting spoke about possible summer school everyone decline due to I could help or not help Terrence. Everyone thought that Terrence need more time to adjust his current foster home and social life before returning to school in the fall. That's the ass this is principal if there something that I could do a social development for Terrence. The social worker felt diagnosing Terrence with a mouth developmental delay with the diagnosis open she did not feel comfortable diagnosing Terrence with any other diagnosis. Terrence fell on the axis of One of the reasons for developmentally the social emotional. Betsy was concerned because Terrence was a good average student but had hitting kicking any loping issues within the school. The group talked about reevaluation and academic achievement change where tenses needs maybe. There is no Cognitive functioning delay. Terrence was farsighted this worker
The second theme collaboration and better communication consisted of the challenges that caseworkers faced when attempting to communicate with the youth’s support team included, social workers and foster parents. From the results lack of communication with the youth’s support team was prevalent in most of the youth in foster care. In addition to the lack of communication, foster youth expressed since they have been in foster care, numerous caseworkers have been in their lives, which also could have an impact on the accuracy of knowledge of supports in services for the youth aging out in foster care
Focus: Ms. Smalls (MHP), Ms. Givens (MHS) and Antazia review the draft treatment plan and progress school behaviors. Intervention: MHP, MHS and Antazia review the draft treatment plan. MHP answered MHS and Antazia questions about the goals and interventions. MHP answered Antazia questions about kinship care and updates from her DSS worker. MHP progress and role-play different ways to communicate with school officials.
Medication issue: The CP addressed with Mrs. Navarro about the CP conversation with Dr. Freddie Marton with regards to Tyler’s medication regimen. The CP asked Mrs. Navarro if she is providing Tyler’s with his medication and her response was that she needs to do a refill and then she says, “Oh, I cannot find them since we are packing.” However, Tyler intervenes and stated that he knows where the medication is and based on Mrs. Navarro reaction, she appeared stunned. Tyler left the living room and returned with the bottle at which appears to be full. The CP glazed at Mrs. Navarro reaction and she immediately stated that she will start giving him his medication and will also considered the school nurse providing Tyler with his medication at the school.
School Psychologist: On 3/17/17 was observed initially in his classroom, but the classroom moved to outside for recess. Benji’s teacher Mrs. Burke related academically that Benji appeared to have difficulties with processing information. Information has to be repeated multiple times before he will complete a task. When the class was asked to line up, Benjy received several reminders from multiple staff members, and then had to be guided to get in line.
The following were discussed: Living Situation/Behaviors/family: Youth is currently living at the YCMA (YES) Shelter. Youth was court ordered on 11/29/16 to temporarily reside at Shelter. Youth is court ordered to obey the shelter rules and youth must attend ERC program. Youth attends the ERC program on Monday through Saturday from 3:00pm to 9:00pm. Youth and family lacks positive communication.
Focus: Anthony and family will learn and demonstrate increased honesty, compliance with rules, control over impulses, and acceptance of responsibility for his behaviors and actions. Ms. Smalls (MHP), Ms. Givens (MHS) and Anthony discuss disruption of placement. Intervention: MHP and MHS discuss school incidents that were recorded, however were not reported to her from the school. MHP review the school documents for SAFY records.
MHP, Santonias and MHS debrief and process a school incident. MHP and MHS discuss Santonias changing in the behaviors and outlook. MHP allow Santonias to express his emotions about being in foster care and wanting to see his brother. MHP emailed Santonias’s DSS worker to provide a little comfort of getting answers to Santonias questions about family visits and length of foster care placement. Response: MHS report Santonias
A) Renee with reach out to key participants for information regarding the impact it will have if youth is not attending school B) Renee and Asa will evaluate other alternatives for an appropriate school placement (Charter school) C) Renee and Asa will have started the the process of registering him in a school A,B) MSTT encourage Renee to inform JPO of the youth lack of school placement and inqurier information on how it may impact is probation status. Renee struggled with the idea because she believed JPO should not have a say in school but a few days later informed MSTT she did reach out to JPO and explained the situation and was informed how this could effect Asa probation status. MSTT educated the family on other school placements to take
Special Populations Agency Interview On February 16th of 2016, an interview was conducted with Mrs. Sharon Mosley Walker. Mrs. Walker is a Commission Investigator for the State of Florida. She was a former Protection Investigator (PI) for Children and Family Service of Jacksonville, Florida. She also worked as a Probation and Correctional officer for the State of Florida.
She choiced to fill out an IEP form for paul is because she wanted to see a tour around the Lake Windsor Middle school “We were hoping to see exactly where
Alicia Wilson is and special education teacher that I have known for a year through subbing in the Parkway School District here in St. Louis, MO. She is the lead teacher for all of the staff that services special needs students at Shenandoah Elementary. Her duties not only include supervising those teachers but also leading IEP meeting and communicating plans for special needs children. Starting off my questions, Wilson described a stakeholder during an IEP meeting are the people that fill the room. This group includes the school administration, parents, the school board of education, teachers, and even the student themselves.
Unfortunately, no significant improvement in this area was ever made as this was evident in my interviews with Alton. Communication and the expression of his feelings are issues that continue to plaque him. To this present day, expressing himself is an uncomfortable task for him to overcome. The IEP formulated for Alton would follow him to the sixth grade. The implementation of the IEP would be instrumental in improving Alton’s academic future.
Family: Benny is a 7 year old male who resides in South Amboy with the Rodriguez family. At this time Benny behavior in the home has improved. He still a little guarded when it comes to talking about his feelings. Benny continues to struggle with being separated from his parents and history of traumatic experiences, exposure to DV and SU, neglect and removal from her biological parents. He continues to feel torn between his biological parents and his new resource home.
Every student with disabilities is also obligated to an IEP specifically for the student’s needs between the ages of 3 and 21 under IDEA. The IEP is created by a team of six or seven, depending on the age of the student. The six members are the parents, an individual that can explain the assessment results, keep in mind, the faculty of the school must not under any circumstances conduct the evaluations without parental consent. Also included is the general education teacher, a local representative from the local education department, the special education teacher and of course the student, who must be included in the meeting if the student is fourteen or older. In this IEP meeting the team members go over what has been planned for the IEP