ipl-logo

Jack Guilty In Lord Of The Flies

979 Words4 Pages

If an adolescent were to commit a horrendous crime such as murder, should they be convicted as guilty or not? Kids at the age 12 should realize what is right from wrong. They obliviously know that if they were to be in a position where they were killing another human, that is just a murderous crime and should be guilty for their actions. In the book Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, a boy named Jack had committed two murders on the island where everyone was stranded. Some people agree that if adolescents were to do something irresponsible and regretful it's because “their brains just haven’t physically matured yet.”(healthychildren.org) It is true that the adolescent brain is still developing and not fully mature, but they should …show more content…

He had no emotion or remorse towards his death as when he implied, “See? See? That’s what you’ll get! I mean that! There isn’t a tribe for you any more! The conch is gone“ (Ch11 Golding) Those were his first words that came out of Jack's mouth after Piggy was murdered showing that he had no sentimental value to him. He knew it was wrong to kill Piggy but all he cares about is himself. As stated in the research of “What’s going on in the teenage brain“ they seem to blame the brain for the consequences adolescents make “While adolescents might tend to be more moody and impulsive — and we now have some reason to believe that this might be reflecting a ‘normal’ part of brain development”.(healthychildren.org) This is practically an excuse that adolescent do not know what they’re doing due to their brains not being “fully developed”(healthychildren.org). Jack knew exactly what he was doing, he even admitted when he said “That’s what you’ll get!”(ch11 Golding) Before that Jack has always wanted the chief position very desperately, knowing his selfishness, brutal self, he would have done anything for it. In fact Jack stayed so calm that it actually seems like the murder was premeditated. Therefore adolescents do know what they’re doing especially when it comes to committing a crime. He should be guilty for his murderous actions. While Jack had premeditated this, he had the time to undergo any emotions before the killing took place, which would explain why he was so insensitive. Jack was not bothered by Piggy’s

Show More
Related

How Did Jack Merridew Change In Lord Of The Flies

484 Words | 2 Pages

For example, Piggy wanted to talk, and he had the shell but Jack kept talking over him. Also to show at the beginning how he still had good morals in him, he was out hunting and had the opportunity to kill the pig for food, but inside him he knew he did not want to do it and that it was not the right thing to do. Later on he did not hesitate to kill the pig, after Jack killed the pig it says, “His mind crowded with memories, memories of the knowledge that had come to them when they closed it on the struggling pig, knowledge that they had outwitted a living thing, imposed their will upon it, taken away its life like a long satisfying drink”(70). Not only did he kill the pig, but he enjoyed it.

Read More

Jack Merridew Is Not A Good Leader

631 Words | 3 Pages

When Jack was called out for letting the fire burn out he simply deflected and started making fun of Piggy, such as calling him “fatty”, mocking him and smacking “Piggy’s head” (Golding 71) . This ends up with Piggy’s specs being broken, which are very important to the survival of Piggy and others. It is sad to see how Jack responded to this by calling names and acting like a five year old instead of owning up for what he did by just apologizing, moving on and fixing his mistake. It is very obvious that he can not handle not getting his way considering how he is so persistent with being in charge and not paying any attention to the rules created by others. (Golding 90-91).

Read More

How Did Jack Die In Lord Of The Flies Persuasive Essay

760 Words | 4 Pages

Jack was involved in the deaths of Simon and Piggy, but was not actually the one who killed them. Since Jack was not the one to actually kill Simon and Piggy, he would not be charged with First Degree Murder. He would be charged with a lower degree of murder other than first degree. Jack had started the events leading up to the deaths of Simon and piggy, he would receive some blame, but enough for a First Degree Murder charge. This argument would be wrong because Jack was reckless and had took a major part in their deaths.

Read More

How Does Golding Present Fear In Lord Of The Flies

824 Words | 4 Pages

In the book Jack is always making fun of Piggy. Jack was being rude to Piggy and saying his fat behind doesn’t do nothing to help while piggy was trying to talk. However some of the time Piggy stands up for himself, “I got the conch … you let me speak!”(Golding 33). Piggy illustrates how its not easy to have integrity. This is because whenever he tries to talk the others mainly Jack just tell him to shut up or take his glasses from him making him feel uncomfortable.

Read More

Who Was Responsible For The Downfall Of Jack In Lord Of The Flies

767 Words | 4 Pages

What would you do if you went on a plane with your coworkers or school peers and crashed on a deserted island? Amid a raging war, a plane evacuating a group of schoolboys crash on a deserted island. First, the boys enjoy their life without grownups and spend much of their time playing games and splashing in the water. Ralph wants the schoolboys to help take care of the need for survival. Jack says that Ralph is a coward and that he should be removed from the leadership.

Read More

Power Corrupt In Lord Of The Flies

1511 Words | 7 Pages

Piggy is fat, brilliant, lacking in social graces, and wears glasses, in other words the outsider on this island. Due to Piggy being such an foreigner, Jack feels that he is above Piggy, and feels better when he causes Piggy pain and sorrow. For example, “‘You’re talking too much,’ said Jack Merridew. ‘Shut up Fatty,’” (21). In this scene you can see power in Piggy’s lack thereof.

Read More

Dialectical Journal For Lord Of The Flies

1769 Words | 8 Pages

This only further proves my point that jack represents savagery in this novel. Due to Jacks overwhelming desire to hunt a pig he along with a small group of boys go into the jungle to try their luck. Because of Jacks carelessness, though the fire is extinguished and they lost a chance of being rescued. We also learn in this chapter that the fire symbolizes the hope they share a group, when the fire went out so did their hope, but when they relight it they regain some of their hope. Piggy being the “fat nerd” of the group his thoughts and beliefs are immediately shot down, its only when Ralph tells them to do the suggested task do they listen.

Read More

Examples Of Savagery In Lord Of The Flies

1619 Words | 7 Pages

He goes to share his hunting story to Ralph and a boy named Piggy. On page 69, the narrator shares, “I cut the pig’s throat,’ said Jack, proudly, and yet twitched as he said it.” This quotation shows us that civilization is lost when the urge to kill takes over because it shows the stage where Jack is proudly killing animals, but still feeling a little bit uncomfortable with it. In this example, Jack proudly shares that he has killed, but still twitches after saying he did. Jack is still hanging onto the little bit of civilization that is left on their island.

Read More

Jack's Evilness In Lord Of The Flies

583 Words | 3 Pages

Lastly, Jack is known as the rebel of the story who disagrees with the leaders, and is pure evil from middle to end. Although Jack is evil, his bad character trait ensures his survival and alliance with the boys. The first example of when Jack’s evilness is shown in the story is when Jack hunts the pig and puts its head on a stick, the line says “ Jack held the head up and jammed the soft throat down on the pointed end of the stick which pierced through into the mouth. He stood back and the head hung there, a little blood dribbling down the stick” ( Golding, 150). This shows Jack’s evilness because instead of fearing the beast he is offering him the head of the pig that he just brutally murdered.

Read More

Why Is Jack Merridew Murder In Lord Of The Flies

913 Words | 4 Pages

In the novel, Lord of the Flies, over a dozen boys are stranded on an island with no adults and to fend for themselves. One individual in Jack Merridew, a boy who is turned cruel and ruthless, is being charged with 1st degree murder for the deaths of two boys, Piggy and Simon. First degree murder is characterized as deaths that a person committed was the individual either plans and commits the murder conscience of their actions. Jack is guilty of first degree and should be charged with 1st murder degree murder because of his direct involvement in Simon’s death, his dictatorial of leadership leading to the other boys’ savage behavior, and his disregard for human life.

Read More

Jack's Influence On Lord Of The Flies

896 Words | 4 Pages

Lord of the Flies Jack represents being power hungry and disobedient for the incorrect reasons In the book Lord of the flies, there are several things that connect the earth right now and human expertise. In the book most of the boys go through a phase that they never went through before, through out the book they're going through a "animal-like" phase that I feel the reader does not expect from them. I decided a decision} to concentrate on Jack because I believe that he was a lot more animal-like then the other boys because of that I think he extremely stands out because of his actions and feelings he made the other boys animal-like. I feel this is often necessary as a result of the influence he created on the other boys is quite like

Read More

Human Behavior In Lord Of The Flies

539 Words | 3 Pages

Should the boys’ savage and immoral behavior be blamed on the situation/environment or on the biological factors? I think that the boys’ savage and immoral behavior should be blamed on biological factors. Your decisions and behavior reflects your brain and your biological factors. In the novel, “Lord of the Flies”, by William Golding, he writes about characters who are lost on an island after their plane crashed.

Read More

Who Was Responsible For Jack's Death In Lord Of The Flies

730 Words | 3 Pages

The Investigation of Jack Merridew On the Island in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, Ralph was able to create the beginnings of a small civilized community. However, Jack Merridew decided that he wanted to take control of the boys, and he was determined to do so however he could. He started by hunting pigs and having feasts, and became more aggressive towards Ralph and his followers as his “tribe” grew. Eventually, Jack’s tribe began verbally and physically attacking Ralph’s group, which led to the deaths of Simon and Piggy.

Read More

Characterization Of Jack In Lord Of The Flies

1212 Words | 5 Pages

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, a Russian novelist and historian once said,”The battle line between good and evil runs through the heart of every man.” In William Golding’s novel Lord of the flies, Jack, the supposedly good former choirmaster and student leader, is a representative of evil and violence when tempted by savagery and greed. Jack has the major authority and develops a higher status compared to other characters in the novel. He is a born leader who carries out his concerns over various problems, however the abusive use of power leads him towards the evil path. Golding has effectively used figurative devices such as a beast metaphor, colour symbolism , controlling tone, imagery of Jack’s appearance and environment to demonstrate his desire of power and devolving character.

Read More

Democracy In Lord Of The Flies Essay

684 Words | 3 Pages

Jack uses the boy’s animalistic need to kill, and shapes it into a fear driven mob. Eventually Jack’s leadership eventually achieves what Ralph and Piggy had attempted to do since the start of the book. Get Rescued. “We saw your smoke. What have you been doing?

Read More

More about Jack Guilty In Lord Of The Flies

Open Document